HOME | DD

Published: 2006-06-12 20:56:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 1867; Favourites: 46; Downloads: 26
Redirect to original
Description
Afterwork: Bordered, sharpened, resizedRecord breakers
Much larger dragonfly species existed in the distant past than occur on earth today. The largest one, found as a fossil, is an extinct Protodonata named Meganeura monyi from the Permian period with a wingspan of 70–75 cm (27.5–29.5 in). This compares to 19 cm (7.5 in) for the largest modern species of odonates, the Hawaiian endemic dragonfly, Anax strenuus. The smallest modern species recorded is the libellulid dragonfly, Nannophya pygmaea from east Asia with a wingspan of only 20 mm, or about 3/4 of an inch.
Dragonflies are the world's fastest insects, capable of reaching speeds of up to 97 km/h (60 mph). [1] The Common Green Darner dragonfly (Anax junius) is nicknamed "Darning Needle" because of its body shape. It is one of the biggest and fastest-flying dragonflies, able to reach speeds of 85 km/h (53 mph). A study showed that dragonflies can travel as much as 137 km (85 mi) in one day. [2]
Dragonflies have very good eyesight due to their unique eye structure. Dragonflies have up to 30,000 facets to their compound eyes; each one is a separate light-sensing organ or ommatidium, arranged to give nearly a 360° field of vision.
It was recently discovered that dragonflies employ a particular optical illusion, termed motion camouflage, to stalk other insects that invade their territory. A dragonfly can move in such a way as to project itself as a stationary object while speedily attacking its victims, new research suggests. These findings illustrate for the first time how dragonflies use complex camouflaging techniques during aerial combat.
`lns
Related content
Comments: 30
Rhodaur [2006-10-20 20:51:18 +0000 UTC]
Good focusing. It seems there were (as always) some luck involved in capturing this beatiful dragonfly into this picture and I hope you will have more luck in the future. I'm pretty sure this specie does not live in Finland... :C It has cool coloring
I would not use progressive jpg encoding.. I hate to wait (even for the shortest time) for the image to sharpen. It gives the first impression of a blurry picture, even when I know that it will sharpen in the future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Rhodaur [2006-11-07 21:38:11 +0000 UTC]
You'd use the raw files? I'm new to photoshop, barely used it for a year, and still learning it. I haven't tried processing the images on my own yet.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhodaur In reply to ladynightseduction [2006-11-09 09:10:51 +0000 UTC]
No, no raw for internet. When saving your image in JPEG format, at least in Photoshop CS2, there comes a screen "JPEG Options" with following Format Options in it.
"Baseline (“Standard” Uses a format recognized by most web browsers.
Baseline Optimized Creates a file with optimized color and a slightly smaller file size.
Progressive Displays a series of increasingly detailed versions of the image (you specify how many) as it downloads.
Note: Not all web browsers support optimized and Progressive JPEG images."
- From PS CS2 Help file.
So, I would play for sure, though only old versions of browsers dont show progressive images. And with slow connections, progressive sucks, since it loads the image in several scans, every one of those getting sharpen... and the first impression is not good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Rhodaur [2006-11-20 16:35:21 +0000 UTC]
Ahhh, I understand. Thank you for that wonderfully concise description of Photoshop and it's quirks, I'm completely self taught in it, and I've yet to really get through every little button and menu. I can use all the help I can find.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhodaur In reply to ladynightseduction [2006-11-26 14:41:05 +0000 UTC]
So do I, so do I...
Tonight I have been trying to optimize couple of my photos for sending in to one competition, but I still don't understand layers... well, maybe in future.
I'm glad I could help you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Rhodaur [2006-11-27 16:07:52 +0000 UTC]
Gah! Layers. I've been working in photoshop for over a year now, self taught mostly, and I don't understand them either! I'm getting better though. The main thing I've figured out is make sure you do any of your change son a copy of your original image, so you don't abuse the pixels to the point of no return.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhodaur In reply to ladynightseduction [2007-01-08 17:56:53 +0000 UTC]
By the way... where did you get this information in Artists Comments?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Rhodaur [2007-01-09 13:50:36 +0000 UTC]
I looked it up on the web, in dragonfly facts I believe. Normally I start at Wikipedia if I don't know the information.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhodaur In reply to ladynightseduction [2007-01-09 16:28:54 +0000 UTC]
Ok thanks... since I'm starting to build an interest for dragonflies, if this keeps up next summer involves lots of dragonfly shooting
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Rhodaur [2007-09-12 00:26:53 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful! A friend of mine just posted a few new ones. Check him out.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhodaur In reply to ladynightseduction [2007-09-12 08:56:11 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for sharing this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ernieleo [2006-08-21 13:31:22 +0000 UTC]
Lovely image and the info is great
I was wondering if you could ID this one [link] I tried looking on the internet, but couldn't figure it out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to ernieleo [2006-08-22 15:19:47 +0000 UTC]
Well it is a dragonfly, the stack of wings give it away. Not a damselfly. But I can't identify the specifics. Beautiful color though, and an awesome shot.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ladynightseduction In reply to Eaglewolf [2006-06-21 16:03:02 +0000 UTC]
I do too, thank you.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nowherekid85 [2006-06-16 13:28:15 +0000 UTC]
a wingspan over two feet ?!?! glad i wasn't around back then!!! the small ones i see are big enough for me!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to nowherekid85 [2006-06-16 16:26:13 +0000 UTC]
LOL.
Imagine. Zippy dragonflies with wingspans wider than hawks. Kinda scary.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oceanbound In reply to ladynightseduction [2006-06-19 20:02:12 +0000 UTC]
Yes it could have your head off. Very good picture. How did you get it to stay still? I find these especially twitchy sods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Oceanbound [2006-06-21 17:13:50 +0000 UTC]
They are! I had a blue colored one too, but every time I moved it would zip off. So finally instead of my small lense I used the zoom and just stayed frozen in one spot. I focused past the leaves he was hiding around and just continued to pull the shutter. I was in a bad position, and to be honest I wasn't sure any of them would come out it was such a bright day I couldn't really see my viewscreen. Plus I was afraid the clicking of the shutter would scare him too, but I got lucky there the bird song drown it out. I was thrilled to see these when I got home, they even picked up the sunlight, and the gossamer wings. Luck, pure luck.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Smokey41 [2006-06-14 19:13:27 +0000 UTC]
Great shot, too I like how you tell about the dragonfly - very informative
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Smokey41 [2006-06-15 00:03:00 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. It's a part of the deviation for me. I get to learn new things, and share some of what I know.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Smokey41 In reply to ladynightseduction [2006-06-15 08:04:25 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure and not a bad idea to learn new things .............. and share some of your own
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Smokey41 [2006-06-15 10:14:51 +0000 UTC]
Nope I love to learn.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kimantha333 [2006-06-12 23:41:28 +0000 UTC]
Wow I love this pic, and no comments.... the new info is awesome... I wonder how they do it? but it doesn't really matter... awesome pic my favorite of the dragonfly ones you did
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Kimantha333 [2006-06-14 11:48:15 +0000 UTC]
I was afraid this one was too light, but I loved the straitions on the wings being so clear, plus the highlights from the sun. Thank you darlin.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kimantha333 In reply to ladynightseduction [2006-06-19 00:04:38 +0000 UTC]
Oh I adore the wings of them... especially when they have those rainbow sheens to them
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ladynightseduction In reply to Kimantha333 [2006-06-21 17:47:32 +0000 UTC]
That was the best part! I'm so glad they sparkled like that on film. err..computer.
`lns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kimantha333 In reply to ladynightseduction [2006-06-22 00:56:14 +0000 UTC]
Oh yes thats great
👍: 0 ⏩: 0