HOME | DD

lawrencew In reply to alfrancis [2007-06-25 09:20:29 +0000 UTC]

..was only for those who wanted to see the sequence, I have consigned it to scraps but seems it will have to be deleted..as scraps doesn't seem to work any more...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alfrancis In reply to lawrencew [2007-06-25 14:59:43 +0000 UTC]

So what if i want to keep it? Don't delete it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to AdRolla [2007-06-21 23:42:36 +0000 UTC]

ta..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to d-eye [2007-06-21 23:42:22 +0000 UTC]

He..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to angels0ul [2007-06-21 23:42:08 +0000 UTC]

Possibly doing a studio shoot with them.. they do work well together

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to LaStrega [2007-06-21 10:28:11 +0000 UTC]

The movement was..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to 500demigod [2007-06-21 10:27:42 +0000 UTC]

Not really.. but ta for commenting..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to Vumnoo [2007-06-21 04:36:21 +0000 UTC]

Ta, Tim.. as a few had asked about the movement.. will leave it up for a couple of days and then scrap it..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vumnoo In reply to lawrencew [2007-06-21 06:48:16 +0000 UTC]

Now all you need is a camera that shoots 25+ frames a second. hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lawrencew In reply to Vumnoo [2007-06-21 10:27:07 +0000 UTC]

I could have shot it @ 4/sec.. but as a recalcitrant traditionalist, refuse to do so.. besides I would have ended up with a whole lot of pics ( like these) which are rather useless..
there's really no point as it takes all the decision making away from you..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vumnoo In reply to lawrencew [2007-06-23 10:06:49 +0000 UTC]

Oh you non conformist!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lawrencew In reply to Vumnoo [2007-06-23 13:24:05 +0000 UTC]

Boring in themselves but useful as a documentation..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to Forget-the-rain [2007-06-21 04:54:23 +0000 UTC]

ta..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lawrencew In reply to s3165938 [2007-06-21 04:54:39 +0000 UTC]

Really..?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

s3165938 In reply to lawrencew [2007-06-21 05:11:56 +0000 UTC]

Indeedy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0