HOME | DD
LazyAmphy — Them sparkle.....
Published: 2013-11-13 15:39:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 1645; Favourites: 55; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Such creative title. Wow D:(Late) birthday gift for *Cloudy-Dreamscape . Her OC and her wartortle
Related content
Comments: 52
Wonderful art but I feel that I must apologize for the mess that was made in the comments. Sorry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks C:. And don't worry about it. Arguing iz good though i'm kinda surprise cuz there're so many words to read, haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thank you soo much! This is just amazing and I know you prefer to draw pokemon so its so kind that you drew Cloudy as well ^^ And you drew Bubble! This piece is so adorable I don't care if its late you put in loads of effort thank you so much <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yay, glad you like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I didnt ask for a dumb answer from a 'pokemon fan' who can't even draw themselvs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
its not a stupid awnser that is literately what you do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nope it's not, since you can't draw I asume you dont know anything about digital art.
So stop being a smartass now and go play with your pikachus c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
Wow, rude.
(Also isn't that how you make squares?)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
he/she wasnt being nice, just a smart as sarcastically giving a non-helpful answer.
It's like saying
''Hey does anyone know how to calculate this math question?''
''Yah you calculate it.''
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Really? Cuz it sounded like he was trying to give a nice answer. :I
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well why don't you stop being such a dumbass. He just told you how he would've done it, and even though you didn't get the answer you wanted, it doesn't give you the right to act like a 7 year old.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
he/she wasnt being nice, just a smart as sarcastically giving a non-helpful answer.
It's like saying
''Hey does anyone know how to calculate this math question?''
''Yah you calculate it.''
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I understand your point view, but it still doesn't give you permission to be even more rude than him.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
In the time it took me to give you a llama I got myself to calm down.
There's no need to be a jackass to anyone who is being nice and giving someone some advice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
he/she wasnt being nice, just a smart as sarcastically giving a non-helpful answer.
It's like saying
''Hey does anyone know how to calculate this math question?''
''Yah you calculate it.''
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I already ran out of fuck to give today so, whatever. To be honest, most people who aren't as flawless are you are portraying yourself to be, wouldn't know the easy methods. I would have said that same answer, honestly and not because I'm a sadistic asshole that loves to inflict pain on people, it's because I don't spend hours learning about digital art tips.
Read the book before you judge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WELL if you think its so funny to keep arguing, I'll continue~
how about this?
I didnt fucking ASK him! my question was directly pointed to the artist, and why the fuck would he answer then?
Why answer if you dont even know the answer?
Now before jumping into someone else's convos maybe READ them first.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"I didn't [] ASK him!"
Why is that relevant? Suppose the artist was not going to answer your question, and someone in fact did know the answer. If they gave you the 'correct' answer, which Poke did, would you still complain?
"My question was directed [at] the artist, and why [] would he answer then?"
The kindness of their heart, willing to spare some of their own time to answer your simple question. If your question was purely and absolutely for the artist, why did you comment in public, where strangers could answer, and not ask via note? If the answer was actually rude or dumb, why isn't that your sole argument, why do you need such excuses?
"Why answer if you don't even know the answer"
He/She did know an answer. There isn't just a single way to have done it. Are you going to claim that using a new layer under the image, copying colors, and creating squares out of them would not have created pretty much the same result?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
He didnt answer correctly. I asked how those pixels were made. Putting squares down is obvious and it doesnt explain how it was done.
Spare time? Take three seconds to write something obvious? I dont know if he wrote it of kindness or just to piss me off, either way this is none of your business. And besides, he answered me after the artist answered me. Which makes him look stupid..
Yes it would make the same result, but what he fucking said doesn't explain it at all. Now I shall kindla ask you to step aside, because this is none of your business as I said.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*First sentence*
So, given that's how I would do, and I would program in Python to do such an effect, how is he wrong? It doesn't warrant explanation as it is an explanation itself since, as you said, "[it] is obvious".
*Second sentence*
If it was obvious, why did you ask? How did you not understand something obvious, it's just putting squares down.
You put it in a public forum, you're bullying an individual for giving you the correct answer, it's everyone business now. What is in private is private, but what is public is public, obvious no?
Why am I concerned if he answered 'after' the artist? He actually answered at practically the same time, he was only 9 seconds later. How does that make him look stupid?
Also, you asserted "he/she wasnt being nice, just a smart as[s] sarcastically giving a non-helpful answer."... so do you know or not know if he was being kind or trying to piss you off?
*Third sentence*
It was 'none of your business' to attack an individual. You just agreed it would get the same result, and it perfectly explained to myself how to do it. You put colored squares down. You clearly know how to make a square, and I assume you're capable of filling in it, and you know how layers work: cooi.deviantart.com/art/Twiste… You had perfectly fine knowledge on how to do it, as you said, it's obvious, so why are you here being quite rude to an individual.
(Also, you asserted he didn't answer correctly, but "Yes it would make the same result" meaning it's a correct answer.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You deserve an award my good sir!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
im not going to write you a book back. So I'll just say this.
I asked how it was done, an explanation. I know you put squares down. But how. which tools. program and so on. That was my fucking question.
The artist answered me. I'm satisfied. And no he didnt answer me correctly. I'm sticking with my opinion. And I'm done with your bullshit. I'm going through stuff now and am easily aggravated right now. So stop messing with me. I never asked to talk to you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually, no, you didn't ask which tools and programs [and so on], your question was: "how did [you] make those pixel things? C:" You asked for the method, did Poke not respond with a method? You didn't ask for anything else but the method. That was [your] question.
We're quite unconcerned if you're "satisfied" with the artist's response, we're "unsatisfied" with your response to us, so therefore we shall continue until you explain why you harassed him and think it was okay in a sound and valid narrative. We've explained why he was right and you were wrong, therefore the next step on your side is to either provide more reasoning or to prove a contradiction in our case. It was completely irrelevant what your opinion is, if your opinion to a police officer for murder was "''oh mr police i just killed him for no reason, it doesnt matter", you'd still be going to jail. It doesn't work in an argument nor debate. You argue facts and knowledge, not opinions and personal tastes. Opinion is irrelevant, your actions and words are relevant.
If my words are bullshit, why are you incapable of refuting them? If they're bullshit, the reason they are wrong must be obvious, no?
Also, if you're so easily aggravated, why do you continue responding? I deal with my own severe emotional problems, but you don't see me cursing and going crazy, and yet, neither are you. You've yet to see me pull that card though, so what's your excuse?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i have no exuses
maybe i should just say ''i did it for no reason'' Just like you think its okay to say!
but im tired of you and thats why im not going on, arguing is boring.
since you wont leave me alone im blocking you now, bye!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mmmmmmmmm girl, someone gotta turn down the temperature on your tea kettle.
And to be honest I don't care that he said something right or wrong or even if the question wasn't directed to him. He did what he did because he felt like it. Ain't gotz to have a reason.
The only reason why I said somethin' cause I was ready to knock a wigga out, get what I'm sayin'? I was annoyed from something else, you were just being rude to him so I said something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
well you and all your little friends are turning it up~
oh really? there needs to be reasons for things you know.
''oh mr police i just killed him for no reason, it doesnt matter.'' nope things cant work that way bud~
i am having a hard time too ok? you dont know what im going through right now, so to get all of you people involved in my convo with someone else is plain stupid
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
He's not even my friend. Also, stop acting so fake with your "~" You be triflin'
I threw my pen across the room, why? Because I felt like it. Using extreme examples is a waste.
There's just no need to be an ass to someone who didn't mean any harm. And on top of that he didn't even say some smartass answer, he said put colored squares.
Also, we are not white knights, I don't even know what the fuck that is. Are you talking about chess?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
'Cool' is incapable of reasoning for herself kindly and orderly in this situation, as she put it herself, she finds it boring (and yet finds it funny...). Even though she's bothered by 'us' 'not leaving her alone', she finds no issue nor reason for it to not be okay for her to do the same to us.
She even banned me from her page since she was incapable of reasoning her way out of her own mess. haaha.
You feeling alright btw? You seem upset, and you don't need to over this quite rude person.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hahaha! I'm fine. I learned to not get mad in these kind of situations, so when I sound angry I generally just change my sentences to look that way.
I was blocked as well, but I don't really care. I don't have any fucks to give and at the same time, blocks are really dumb. Can't block people in real life so why do it in the internet world? It only shows are weak people are.
But yeah, I'm alright.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"There needs to be reasons for things you know"
No, actually. Axioms don't need reasons to be true, they're axioms, they require no further explanation. The only thing required of them is consistency. Otherwise you'd get infinite regression.
Also, how does the issue of you harassing Poke have anything to do with murder? I would think murder would be a crime against morality, rights, and the law, and therefore requires legal defense and reasons, but answering a simple question with a simple answer warrants none of this.
Out of curiosity, why couldn't you have asked to Poke "How do I put the squares down?" or even "How do I do that?" If you are having a hard time, stop making it hard for others and maybe they would not be upset.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The murder was an example. to prove why there needs to be reasons for things.
I didn't ask him cuz I already had a fucking answer.
Now leave me alone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And I explained why it was a bad example, they are unrelated.
Also, I disproved your 'proof' that there needs to be reasons for things by bringing up Axioms, which are unexplained statement that are assumed true without question or reasons. (Heck, if you want to go further, a mathematician named Kurt Gödel even proved there are statements that are definitely true in logic but can't be proven no matter how hard you try, so there is not reasons for everything)
Also, no, you didn't have [an] answer when you responded to him at 8:52, since Riku didn't give you the answer until 8:58. Heck, even Riku's first answer, which you admitted you couldn't use, you didn't respond to until after you answered Poke.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
a pixel is a color square, a big pixel is still the same. they are both color squares arranged to make a picture. weather its big or small its the same concept. (and i dont liek pikachus)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
im laughing so hard at you now..sending all these white knights at me hahah
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Pokefan was just trying to be helpful. Sure it was a fairly sarcastic looking answer but even if it was it could have been true. I know you've received a lot of unwanted attention from your reaction but I just want everything to be set right!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i dont see why your complaining any ways. you asked aquestion and i gave a real awnser
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
just quit it, your answer was just plain dumb and non-helping so just quit it c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it was a real answer. that is basically what it is. no matter how you say it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes but it doesnt explain what tool to use, how to do it, which program to help you, if its easy hard.
you probably dont even know the answer to ANY of those!
thats like if I ask someone
''my computer is broken, do you know what how to fix it?''
and they say
''Yeah, you fix it''
.
well im gone now cuz if you dont get it you're too dumb for me to speak with c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh that's easy. In photoshop , duplicate the layer of the finished drawing, go to filter --> pixelate --> mosaic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oohh i use paint tool sai ;v; well thanks anyway!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well there is still a way. First you save your finished drawing, then change the image size to a very small size ( for example 20 x 10 pixel ), then copy it to the original size drawing and scale it up
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>