HOME | DD

Published: 2007-05-17 06:56:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 517; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Yes, gasp... I did use a Nikon.Nikon D70 + Nikon 10.5mm fisheye.
Related content
Comments: 18
Creamlistner11092 [2007-05-18 00:32:31 +0000 UTC]
Looks great, I like the fisheye effect on It, works wonderfully with the shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
geek7 [2007-05-17 11:31:21 +0000 UTC]
I hope you washed your hand before your touched your canon again
Nice shot, the 10.5 ios quite a nice lens
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AchillesZ32 [2007-05-17 11:21:48 +0000 UTC]
Great shot. A very unique perspective of the opera house
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Beha89 [2007-05-17 10:50:19 +0000 UTC]
very nice indeed....very good angel
the colours are really nice indeed, might a BW would have looked good aswell
by the way, why use other that Nikon
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shell4art [2007-05-17 09:26:55 +0000 UTC]
This really stands out..a delighful piece of artwork. Bravo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
3u3 [2007-05-17 08:50:51 +0000 UTC]
this is great dan.
love the way you've captured the pattern in the tiles.
how's the D70?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ldo In reply to 3u3 [2007-05-17 09:31:14 +0000 UTC]
I find all Nikon's ergonomics to be absolute shit house. I'm not a fan of their cameras, but this lens is awesome and has made me consider buying a fisheye for my 20D.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
3u3 In reply to ldo [2007-05-17 11:15:33 +0000 UTC]
haha.
yeah I've done some light investigation into canon's fish-eye offerings, or should i say offering, i found one ef lens and the price was enough to make your eyes pop out.
my friend has a lomograph 35mm fish eye she bought for $70, personally i love the grainy and wholesome nature of the shots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ldo In reply to 3u3 [2007-05-17 11:33:12 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, the Canon 15mm fisheye is old and pricey. The Sigma offerings would probably be a better choice, or if you want real cheap - Zenitar 16mm or Peleng 8mm M42 MF lenses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0