HOME | DD

lestat — Femscape

Published: 2002-01-29 03:06:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 538; Favourites: 3; Downloads: 64
Redirect to original
Description I have seen so many comments about how images on this site aren't "Original". Would someone define Original for me? "There is nothing new under the sun". King Solomon said that in Ecclesiastes. Since we are unfortunate enough to come late to the art scene (its been around for a while folks, Michelangelo posted his stuff at [link] and he copied many masters of the time) I don't see how anyone can cop that attitude, unless it is through ignorance.

This is definitely influenced by Giger. This is definitely my own work, using Bryce and Photoshop. There are no stock photos used and no "Cut and Paste" images used in this. This is a female figure, but it is not "Porn" (another definition I would like to see in print). This has no patriotic influence to it, except I think the Swiss "Kick Ass" for many reasons (Giger is Swiss). I posted this in hopes of getting the daily deviant (this also cracks me up, who posts for the sake of anonymity?)

Thanks for reading/viewing and comment as you see fit. If you think it sucks, please say so. As long as you are willing to go beyond such a literary comment and explain why you think so. That is what I am interested in and what will help me to become more than I am in my play.

Thanks.

(EDIT) Reposted this in a more appropriate gallery. Made a errant click on the first submission...
Related content
Comments: 4

siona [2002-04-01 02:07:51 +0000 UTC]

i will be plain here say. like it. giger fan myself and yes,cant post anything here cos is "copied" lol. besides would be too obscene heh.
great work thus.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanguru [2002-03-02 16:57:51 +0000 UTC]

very abstract, but amazingly good. i think i had to look a little too hard to find that woman in there, something that was a little turn off from this image. it's well done, i think the monotone colors and little bit of lighting really accented the piece, but it just made it hard to find the exact purpose behind it. if i had not been looking for a woman, i doubt i would have been able to find her in this piece. i dunno, i guess it's just something to think of. can people see what i want them to see without me telling them it's there? i cannot stress how well done this piece is though, amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bloc [2002-01-30 11:20:53 +0000 UTC]


Its in the Giger spirit alright,and the title suggests an exploring piece of art.But I hav to say its a bit uninspiring..in the way that it dont seem to communicate what u wanna tell with it...I know its a sin a make a piece for the DD(I do it myself...)but in the long run,I discovered that to make a picture just for one self IS the best way to go.Does nt matter then what u "copying" then...u put more of yourself in it.so -if the thing is good,u show it to others.But hey,not ALL DDs are original and innovative pictures,so if u dont get one,that doesnt mean your piece is bad in some way...

U got a good picture,but its lacks that little "something"...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

matanza [2002-01-29 06:19:29 +0000 UTC]

whoah.. thats trippy.. I looked at the peice before i read all the details and I looked at it for a few seconds and then i saw the chick laying down.. very cool.. and original

+Sometimes Its Story Time+

👍: 0 ⏩: 0