HOME | DD
LightningTheFox7 — Skin/Pimp My Wii U
Published: 2013-02-03 19:14:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 3283; Favourites: 5; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description
As with all my electronic devices I have to skin them all!!!!The Wii U is no exception I put on the Dante skin from Decalgirl.com
Love how it turned out, the wolf skin on the Xbox still looks good to.
Related content
Comments: 27
Wow, i browse Decalgirl all the time, but i've never seen an actual skin applied to a machine. Now that i've seen it, im so purchasing a skin for my devices.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
whats the name of the site you got the skins for the consoles from?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
and I'm going to have it cause I found the skin on the site and I'm going to buy it wif my tax returns X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
YOU WHORE 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah got to stick to dark skins if its black light skins if its white
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
what I should have done is one of those ones up to something like this...[link] and I know there are more of these out there but where lolz...I'll have to look around lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow look at that. Though from the look of it, I am kinda discouraged to get a Wii U. Its like making the console be a hand held, and the buttons do not look like they are in the best place. Kinda wonder what the PS4 is going to come out with, because they always blow everyone away with how the controller works and feels and how it is always more convenient with usage. I tried the Wii remots and found them to be a pain. a pain to get batters, or charge and can't use them, a pain to use or get any reaction from them. button placing was horrible on them. and they went with less buttons than the previous Nintendos. even the Super Nintendo had more buttons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not really the tablet works with your TV EG playing a zelda game all your inventory, life gauge and all the crap is displayed on the controller leaving the TV clear for the game itself it's not a hand held at all it does not work unless the system is on other then the remote function for your TV It's actually very light and comfortable to use I find it to be lighter then a actual regular controller
They have this if you dont' want to use the tablet or wii remotes
[link]
I find the controllers are all the same just differently labled
Not really PS3 got destroyed by the wii, so bad that they had to make the PS move to copy the wii which did terrible, they have a nasty history of copying Nintendo so don't surprised if there is a screen in the controller. The only thing they of course win at is the Graphics
Nintendo will always beat them on the price ps3 was almost $1000 when it came out I am scared to see how much PS4 will be same with xbox
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well when I saw one, the tablet was displaying the same thing as the TV was. and its a big rectangle, not like it fits in your hands and curves to your fingers. also that controller looks alot like an X box controller LOL.
The PS3 controller that I have does not need to batterys and does not need a recharger. It the controllers power is low, I can connect it directly to the PS3 and still be able to play as it regains power, but I never had to do that because I kept it plugged in when I was not playing it, and I can have it unplugged for hours. A Wii Remote you had to buy a seperet charger and it had to charge for hours so you can play what, 2 hours?
Yes the PS3 was real expensive, so I waited a long time till it went down Nintendo was always cheaper. and yes graphics was alot better on the PS3 and graphics is not everything. Though I found I like the games more on the PS3 than the Wii, Since the Wii just had a ha huge library based for the remote action, thus all the games where just mini games. hardly any real games. about the only good game they had at the time was Super Smash bros. at the time I was buying my first counsel, I went with the cube, not the Wii. The Wii was just a gimmick with its remote, and gimmicks get boring fast if it don't have good games to back it up. But did they fix that for the Wii U? I don't know.
And yeah you get what you pay for, PS3 was loaded with all sorts of things that the Wii could not do, but it was expensive and lower class people could not get it. and yeah the PS3 undoubtedly will be "DAMN!!" LOL But I have been a Nintendo fan for a long time. but lately, the only game I have interest with them now is Zelda. and one game is not enough to get a whole system. and sadly I have not gotten to play Skyward Sword yet. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nope not at all but you can use the tablet only, if you just want to browse the net or soemthing quickly
o.O Wii remotes don't need a charger you put any batteries in them you want I have recharbel ones in it I get over 24 hours of play time with it
Meh that Gimmick still destroyed both the PS3 and X box in sales only now they are ctaching up since the Wii is dead
Not really Sony slaps the cheapest components they can in their devices then charge you huge amounts of money because it says "Sony" on it they are famous for that, they have gone down in quality so bad my eniter family refuses to buy any Sony products due to thier terrible quality I could not imagine buying a system from them I would rather get a x box
It's a good game but NOTHING in compared to Twilight princess..... and I am not just saying that cause you can transform into a wolf lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Still you have to buy battery's. and or another charger of some kind. Its still buyng something separate.
Sails of something cheaper are often higher. And alot of people only bought it for one or 2 games. Super Smash and Zelda.
They must be giving you a different product in Canada, because most of the Sony products I get are really good. and I had friends that had an Xbox, and told me they much rather have a PS3, only reason they got the XBox was for Halo. But my friend traded his Xbox for a wii. LOL
Oh Twilight Princess was awesome!! I played it on the Cube. I tried to play it on the Wii, but did not like it as much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's all the same maker no wonder Samsung is kicking their butt now
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually I had found that many companys send different grades of quality to different countrys. But meha. I found that the PC is better than both of them anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not for Canada and US they are the same
Graphically yes but game wise no
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well don't know what else to say than I enjoy my PS3, which has the first wireless controller I like. Not only that, Nintendo is not VR. You do know that Japan has been developing the technology that you can control things with your mind? They got robotic cat ears that react to your emotions now. There is a possibility that the PS4 may utilize that. But won't know till it comes out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Really I find them to the worse terrible postion and shapes instead of letters for commands.. just awful
hope you enjoy paying $5000 dollars if they do, don't worry they like to copy Nintendo expect a tablet controller or a tablet invloved in some with and heavy empahsis on 3D to push 3D TV's
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOL I would admit that Nintendo is the one that trys new things more than any other company. you have any idea how many accessory there where just for the NES? Though with each generation they seemed to have less accessory though.
But if you really want to say that they stole that idea with the remote and everything. Then we can say that all the consuls stole the Pause button idea from Atari. thus making even Nintendo a rip offer and all bad. Or go even further. everyone ripped off the Oddacy with making controllers, and changeable cartridges. or the rip off with using a CD Nintendo was about last with doing that, does that mean Nintendo ripped off everyone else? Also I assume that the Wii U is now HD, does that mean they ripped of PS3 and X box? Or does it mean people thought those ideas where nice and for the sake of the buyers amusement, they add them in?
It is important to have more than one consul company. Because they strive to be better than the other, to make a good product. Do you think Nintendo would have made the Super Nintendo if Sega was not around? No, the whole point of making the Super Nintendo was so they could compete with Sega. Without Sega, Nintendo would not be so good today. We probably would still be using the NES if no other company came around.
I am not saying that the Wii U is bad, I just so far do not prefer it. In order to impress me, I have to see games I really like and not feel crippled with the controls. With that wii remote, I felt crippled and the few games I tried, I did not have fun playing them. But if you like it, that's great! We need Nintendo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol not really those technologies were invented by none game console makers got to play the game somehow right
Sony is funny that way love how when ps3 fist came out they are like we do not consider Nintendo a copetetor especially with thier motion controller then they go and build the move which failed.... kind of looked like a wii remote.... a lot
haha hd was not invented by either of the console makers
not saying their should not be competition its how the world works and Sony needs to go with their terrible products charging way too much because it says sony on especially their phones and gaming systemes the vita really needs go what a awful device I laughed at the Sony store closing here cause people are realizing their are better alternatives then paying for a name
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Even though, they still all took the same method and had simaler kinds of buttons.
I never tried there motion stick or what ever PS3 calls it, so I can't make a comparison, but my statement and examples still stand.
Sure HD was not invented by ether of them, nether was a motion remote. That is actually really old technology, back in the 80's as far as I know. Thus my example still stands.
yeah some things charge you for a name, everything does. anything you find in the food store, your paying for a name. and if people want to do that, that is there busness. And if people hate that the product is so unnecessarily expensive, Then don't buy it and show them a statement. what decides if a name can be expensive or not is determine how many people will pay that price. If enough people stop buying it, then the value of the name drops.
I think I had a Sony phone once, but right now I have a Pantech. as far as I know, my PS3 is the only thing I got from Sony, and I got it for a good price. only $150 I buy things I like for the price I think is far. Now when the thing was $400, I would not have bought it. But if I remember right the 3DO was $700 back in the 80's. at least I think it was the 3DO. So in comparison taking the time difference. the PS3 is way cheaper than the 3DO was. The only argument you have is that its overprices.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dude it was a damn wii remote with a light up ball slapped onto it lol
That they do which is why they are loosing ground to other electronic companies
Yeah Overpriced, cheap parts, terribly engineered I would say I have a few arguments. When I went to school my roommate had a PS3 it was a old apartment and town so the power often flicker, he was on his PS3 I was on my Xbox the power flickerd off and on a few times, xbox booted back up no prob, his PS3's hard drive completely corrupted and lost everything, he had to get me do surgery on it and put in a new hard drive cause they put some shitty hard drive in it..... I don't even like the Xbox that much but at least there is a decent hard drive in it.
When they have to come out with..... what they are on the 3rd redesign/model of the system now and removed backwards compatibility on it so people would actually buy it instead of a PS2 that says something lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I was playing my PS3 and the power flickered and went out. and when the power was back on, the PS3 worked fine, I had no problems. don't know why his did that, but just because one does it does not mean they all do. but I suppose just because mine works, not all do LOL
yeah the backwards capability being taking out was outrageous, I mean even Atari was backwards compatible. don't tell me the PS3 could not do it. So yes i agree in that accept that is a bad score for the PS3. that is one thing they should have kept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
