HOME | DD

#bikini #inklings #marina #nintendo #offthehook #pearl #splatoon #swimsuit #splatoon2 #pearlandmarina
Published: 2018-11-28 22:18:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 14958; Favourites: 431; Downloads: 30
Redirect to original
Description
The title is a reference to the Splatoon 2 Pearl's demo before she joined Off the Hook (#$@%* Dudes Be #$@%* Sleepin): LinkSome might be aware that last time DA "admins" decided to remove half of my Shantae pictures using the current restrictions of "erotic and fetish content" (Link ), based on the fact that the character is 16 in her "original context", Invalidating my depictions of an adult version of her, so I thought to myself...
What would happen if I tried the total opposite and drew a character that looks younger despite being older in its "original context"?
If you read closely, based on the wording of the current restrictions they give priority to the "context age" without any particular mention of appearance, hence why aged up versions are still technically not allowed. So, in theory, almost all depictions of characters like Pearl should be protected by the same policy, because she is in fact 21 in her "Original context" (It's true look it up), so any attempt of removing it using the same restrictions should be invalid.
Would they give priority to appearance over age if someone were to claim it?... Because last time I checked they removed more than 30 submissions from my gallery because of the age of a character, without any consideration of its appearance.
Personally, I still think it's dumb to threat swimsuit pictures as if they were erotic or fetish content by nature, but I'm 90% sure that the removal of all my artworks didn't solely respond on the content itself, but rather the fact that it was reported by trolls... That doesn't change the fact that I should have been able to ask for a revision from DA staff if I thought they were making a mistake, because now I have my doubts if there's real humans behind the help desk of this site.
I'll now proceed to upload all my artworks as usual until I stumble into another hurdle, thanks for reading
Update: By November 30th this artwork was flagged for supposedly featuring Mature content, more details on this Journal: Link
[Patreon] [Pixiv] [Twitter] [Instagram] [Blogger] [FurAffinnity]
Related content
Comments: 85
The-Brovahkiin [2022-08-11 09:50:32 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to The-Brovahkiin [2022-12-02 16:42:05 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MichaelJohnMorris [2020-05-24 02:09:06 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to BookWormGreen [2020-05-24 02:08:43 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LinkerArts In reply to BookWormGreen [2019-11-20 16:31:59 +0000 UTC]
Drawings can kill people after all.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Feurdelis [2019-02-23 19:53:35 +0000 UTC]
It truly does suck what DA did man, the fact they keep allowing this stuff is insane, and how they refuse to catch onto how it can be abused.
On that note, very clever and funny way of sorta getting back at the system man! Love the play on words with the title and even how this seems so in character for both of them to respond. Lovely work on the lighting too and even the shine effect done here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MichaelJohnMorris [2019-01-24 21:44:48 +0000 UTC]
What makes it more stupid is that Pearl and Marina are confirmed 21 and 18. >_<
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2019-02-04 01:10:49 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that's the funny thing. Based on the rules Pearl should be allowed, which is dumb because I always draw Shantae with more than adult proportions, but since she's not canonically of age it's not allowed XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to LinkerArts [2019-02-04 02:22:12 +0000 UTC]
What's wrong with drawing her that way and saying "She's 18 here!"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2019-02-12 21:35:04 +0000 UTC]
Deviantart has an explicit rule that doesn't allow aged up characters, they don't count,. If they're of a certain age in their original source they treat it as such.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to LinkerArts [2019-02-13 17:12:17 +0000 UTC]
Even when they become adults in their original source? That'd be just plain stupid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2019-02-14 03:22:42 +0000 UTC]
I re-uploaded a couple yesterday, they already took them down even when they were filtered as mature content xP
They work by claims, I just wonder how many you need to get your stuff taken down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to LinkerArts [2019-02-15 14:25:05 +0000 UTC]
Guess it depends. The admins here must be really corrupt and/or idiots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mewnimilitary42 In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2021-05-03 21:53:37 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
MichaelJohnMorris In reply to mewnimilitary42 [2021-05-04 21:40:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mewnimilitary42 In reply to MichaelJohnMorris [2021-05-04 22:55:23 +0000 UTC]
Hey, why not try reposting this? Someone’s gotta be crazy enough to do this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PsychoBeef28 [2018-12-08 23:31:55 +0000 UTC]
16 is the legal age where i am so this whole thing look even more retarded to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to PsychoBeef28 [2018-12-13 16:40:59 +0000 UTC]
I understand to some extend the idea of limiting the content on that regard.. but I can't help but feel we're all just wasting our time arguing about the supposed age of non-existent people XD I think this fictional characters will be okay at the end of the day, there's bigger issues out there to deal with XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PsychoBeef28 In reply to LinkerArts [2018-12-13 17:04:26 +0000 UTC]
I made a journal about this. "Psycho Rants: Small R34 Defense"
Check it out. Its short
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to PsychoBeef28 [2018-12-14 15:43:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I gave it a read now.
Taking fiction too seriously is not healthy, nobody gains anything from scrutinizing it like that, let alone some indie artist on a corner of the internet XP they won't have an impact on the bigger frame unless they're insanely popular.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mewnimilitary42 In reply to LinkerArts [2021-05-03 21:55:09 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Xanegoh [2018-12-02 21:55:07 +0000 UTC]
This makes no sense since Senran Kagura images are apparently okay, despite the fact that 90% of the characters are under the age of 18.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to Xanegoh [2018-12-13 16:46:43 +0000 UTC]
Maybe the fan base of senran kagura cares less about the lewds, because that's the main feature of the series, While Shantae has some obsessed fans that don't want to see some type of content.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xanegoh In reply to LinkerArts [2018-12-14 03:43:15 +0000 UTC]
But there's official art of Shantae in a bikini, and all of the girls in slave Leia costumes. "Pirate's Curse" had her nude in a tub. I mean, there's nothing to see, but still.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to Xanegoh [2018-12-14 23:43:34 +0000 UTC]
Someone wrote me about not liking pirate's curse for the fan service, so there's people out there that don't like it even when the company does it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LinkerArts In reply to madworld-guy [2018-12-13 16:44:50 +0000 UTC]
They have it all backwards XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FantasyRebirth96 [2018-11-29 18:00:46 +0000 UTC]
So so cool the way you made this! Nice job overall! Really hope you'll do some swordplay scenes one day~ It's up to you I'm making a suggestion not a request or a money commission that's all^^ Keep up the great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to FantasyRebirth96 [2018-12-01 00:13:38 +0000 UTC]
I wanted to try fight scenes, but they're not that easy XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Big-Uncle-V [2018-11-29 15:41:43 +0000 UTC]
It has to mean something when a drawing protesting the current ruling of DA art by taking advantage of its biggest loophole makes it to the front page. Either everyone agrees, or eeeeeveryone loves Pearl. ^~^
More than likely it's some combo of both.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to Big-Uncle-V [2018-11-29 23:32:24 +0000 UTC]
or the admins finally payed attention and they're placing a big target on me XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mewnimilitary42 In reply to LinkerArts [2021-05-03 21:57:40 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
imkipper [2018-11-29 14:52:00 +0000 UTC]
What I find kinda funny is lots of people under 18 on here have posted bikini pics and ive seen some post very risky pics and they r under 18 so this is just plain dumb to ban art
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to imkipper [2018-11-29 23:31:26 +0000 UTC]
Someone has already reported this one for having "mature content", I'm just surprised it took this little.
I haven't stumble upon RL pictures of those that you describe, but I have seen photos of very suggestive content without any filter on it and it's not that hard to finds honestly. My only guess is that not enough people report them to be an issue for the account and they stay there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
imkipper In reply to LinkerArts [2018-11-30 01:41:08 +0000 UTC]
I have seen completely naked girls on here with no filter which I find funny because DA says they dont accept porn
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LinkerArts In reply to imkipper [2018-11-30 23:23:56 +0000 UTC]
I filtered the artwork because I'm not sure what will happen if I don't, and I also can't ask for a revision because they only give me a warning:
i.imgur.com/f17upiQ.jpg
But I'm pretty sure last time I got a warning like this, they just removed the artwork, it would be interesting if it happens again. It would mean that it doesn't really matter what you do after it being reported it would still be removed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sorantheman [2018-11-29 14:46:16 +0000 UTC]
Wonder who she is flipping off.
also, holy crap. This made it into the front page of the 24 hr popular for today. Great job, Luis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>