HOME | DD

lisa-im-laerm β€” What Really Counts!

#atheism #commit #convictions #counts #earth #evil #fully #funny #men #never #pascal #quote #quotes #religion #religious #solar #univers #so #what #system #really
Published: 2015-04-24 18:40:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 766; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description "Men never commit evil so fully and joyfuly as when they do it for religious convictions"
-- Blaise Pascal
Related content
Comments: 29

sifistoneage [2020-05-09 02:21:45 +0000 UTC]

Hey, he's got to manage the whole thing, including us humans, also I'm not convinced masterbation is always a sin, though it can be dependency forming

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Packless1 [2018-11-10 16:31:35 +0000 UTC]

Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Packless1 [2018-11-12 15:15:27 +0000 UTC]



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lingondraken [2015-09-07 09:57:39 +0000 UTC]

Spot on!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Lingondraken [2015-09-07 15:59:13 +0000 UTC]

yeah

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDarkHeretic [2015-07-18 16:57:24 +0000 UTC]

Das ist so genial ! Geniale wissenschaftliche Zusammenstellung und pointe Β Β Β Β Β  !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to TheDarkHeretic [2015-07-18 17:06:04 +0000 UTC]

Fand' ich auch, da wird einem die AbsurditΓ€t der ganzen Lehre noch bewusster gemacht und das auf eine lustige Art und Weise

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDarkHeretic In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2015-07-18 22:33:52 +0000 UTC]

Auf jeden Fall Β Β !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to TheDarkHeretic [2015-07-20 15:45:49 +0000 UTC]



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

moonfairy1999 [2015-05-03 03:16:27 +0000 UTC]

Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to moonfairy1999 [2015-05-04 15:26:11 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

moonfairy1999 In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2015-05-04 19:11:58 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to moonfairy1999 [2015-05-05 14:32:46 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChalkArtist1216 [2015-04-27 19:14:46 +0000 UTC]

Don't masturbate? [long sigh] NOW you tell me...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to ChalkArtist1216 [2015-05-02 09:50:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LE2 [2015-04-26 19:21:43 +0000 UTC]

Remember, God needed a whole day to create the sun, and he also needed a whole day to create all the stars, because, after all, the stars are just itsy-bitsy dots of light!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to LE2 [2015-04-27 16:00:00 +0000 UTC]

Problem also is, without the sun, earth and moon, there are no "days"!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LE2 In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2015-04-27 19:21:27 +0000 UTC]

For the sake of convenience, I'll refer to any 24 hour period as a "day". (That's how they do it in parts of the world where the sun or moon doesn't set during certain seasons.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to LE2 [2015-04-29 15:29:29 +0000 UTC]

time isn't constant in every part of the universe, in the near of black holes f.e.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LE2 In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2015-04-29 18:33:56 +0000 UTC]

Thinking about things like time in space kinda blows my mind! I think I watch too much Star Trek.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to LE2 [2015-04-30 15:06:51 +0000 UTC]

Star Trek is cool, even when I don't watch it, anymore. But I did in the past, very much and very often...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LE2 In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2015-04-30 21:33:25 +0000 UTC]

Check out the Star Trek recap pages on TV Tropes. I wrote most of them!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to LE2 [2015-05-02 09:06:14 +0000 UTC]

Watched lately the movie version and it was really good! But I don't wanna get "addicted" again. I am already watching too much tv, now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PyrrhusiVictoria [2015-04-25 18:28:32 +0000 UTC]

LOL Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to PyrrhusiVictoria [2015-04-25 18:40:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PyrrhusiVictoria In reply to lisa-im-laerm [2015-04-26 03:11:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to PyrrhusiVictoria [2015-04-27 16:01:09 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Quick-5 [2015-04-25 15:31:42 +0000 UTC]

Wow, control freak much, Jesus?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lisa-im-laerm In reply to Quick-5 [2015-04-25 15:43:56 +0000 UTC]

with the "right" priorities, it seems

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0