HOME | DD

Published: 2013-11-20 14:44:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 708; Favourites: 55; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description
18x24" 45x60cm acrylic on hardboard
This one's all about the sky. It began, however, with the idea of painting a larger version of something like "Fall in the Lane". I painted the foliage but by the time I was getting down to thinking about what I wanted to do for the lane or street or whatever, it wasn't working. So I decided to paint a Thames scene, and proceeded to do so from the bottom up, slowly covering trees to make a dark sky. Well, I played around with the sky, lightening it by and by, which meant that the foreground had to be more detailed or it wouldn't look right, and well then there was my special bug-a-boo; the middle distance. I had some in the form of the Hungerford bridge, and there was no sense of depth in the painting. I just don't do middle distance... So I covered it up with this simple foreground who's only purpose is to support the sky and went back to work on my sky, which was what interested me anyways. I spent two days trying out different skies. What you have here is parts of all those skies after I misted water on the sky and scraped the whole sky with a razor blade several times taking off this layer and that and then touched it up a little to get what we have here. (One of the great advantages of hardboard over canvas.) The last question was time of day, needed to give the painting a title. It had been morning right until the end, but by the time I finished it felt more evening. Time flies, I guess. That, however, is a better fit because I usually paint looking north, morning sunlight from my right, evening sunlight from my left. I never have to include the sun in my painting.
Related content
Comments: 17
delph-ambi [2013-11-28 16:13:13 +0000 UTC]
Fascinating to read the process. The amazing thing is that the end result looks so spontaneous. Lovely painting.
π: 0 β©: 1
litka In reply to delph-ambi [2013-12-03 15:06:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks again for commenting.
π: 0 β©: 1
delph-ambi In reply to litka [2013-12-03 17:15:13 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome. Always look forward to seeing your paintings.
π: 0 β©: 0
TriciaS [2013-11-24 15:00:59 +0000 UTC]
All your work resulted in the lovliest of skies!!....I'm so glad you have the people on this one ....They definitely make the scenery look immense!!
π: 0 β©: 1
CBSites [2013-11-21 03:49:05 +0000 UTC]
Very nice classical work. Β Check out my James Charles piece from the 1880s, Β I think you will enjoy it. Β
π: 0 β©: 1
litka In reply to CBSites [2013-11-21 04:23:02 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I did enjoy it and his other work I could find with a google search. He has a very nice sense of light, like his skies, and well, unlike me, he can actually paint things. Even horses.
π: 0 β©: 1
CBSites In reply to litka [2013-12-02 05:26:26 +0000 UTC]
He's anΒ unusually underrated impressionist (I think it's the British label that tags him). Β He does do an amazing sky because it's painted so classically. Β I thought your skies where quite good too by the way. Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
litka In reply to CBSites [2013-12-03 15:29:07 +0000 UTC]
I see that he has paintings in the two big books of impressionists painters I own; The Picnic in both and one has Disturbing the Fishers as well. But then the section on British impressionist is pretty small... But then the British have lots of really delightful landscape painters who aren't famous.
π: 0 β©: 0
Papercolour [2013-11-20 19:09:51 +0000 UTC]
That Is interresting to read and see the result.
π: 0 β©: 1
litka In reply to Papercolour [2013-11-21 04:24:16 +0000 UTC]
It all comes from not having more than a vague idea that usually doesn't work.
π: 0 β©: 0
brain-tree [2013-11-20 18:17:46 +0000 UTC]
Exceedingly beautiful...this would be something I would want hanging on my wall.
π: 0 β©: 1
litka In reply to brain-tree [2013-11-21 04:28:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I have it on my wall right now. I'll keep it up until I paint two more that size since rotate the good ones between two frames.Β
π: 0 β©: 0