HOME | DD
lobo91 β An experiment gone wrong: Transformation troubles
#mishap #pokeumans #pokemonfanart #transformation #galvantula #frogadier #greninja
Published: 2018-01-27 14:16:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 3030; Favourites: 58; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
A follow-up picture to 'An experiment gone wrong' comic that drew for me.Important notice: This is NON-CANON and is not a part of my story. This is a mere 'what-if' side story I have come up with purely for entertainment.
Disclaimer: No pokΓ©umans were harmed in the production of this comic. We used licensed stunt mons for some of the more effectful scenes.
It seems this gem-like device is harder to figure out than Josh hoped it to be. And now I am a Greninja.... what is next? I poof into a Latios on Josh's next try?
=====
You can find the original art piece here: fav.me/dc1alov
Art by
Alexander, Ainja and Josh belongs to
PokΓ©uman concept by
Related content
Comments: 15
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
Hehe.. Kurtis did a great job there indeed. ^^ <3
π: 0 β©: 0
what is next? I poof into a Latios on Josh's next try?
Nope, it's... Cascoon! Β
π: 0 β©: 1
XD Bahahaha! That would be epic rip for poor little me. XD
π: 0 β©: 1
How does a possible yes to that based on your likely preference and nod to Flaridan sound?
π: 0 β©: 1
It's Flardan, not Flaridan. XD
And I simply love Latios as my top favorite PokΓ©mon (Latias being second top favorite by a small margin).
π: 0 β©: 1
I wasn't certain about the full name, which was why I inevitably chose to spell it by pronunciation to make it seem visibly fuller and more fluid. No matter.
Though, that love for the Latis is obvious even now, despite other projects including certain Axews, Treeckos, Snivys, etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
I see. But Flardan's the name on my Latios. Flarida is the name on my Latias.
Latis are top favorite, but I still have love for Axews, Treeckos, Snivys and such too. <3
π: 0 β©: 1
I realize that in retrospect. No matter, I guess.
Given their various applications in your other concepts, of course. Though, such things are clearly not to be shown here.
π: 0 β©: 1
For a good reason too, yes. Let's leave it at that too.
π: 0 β©: 1