HOME | DD

Luigi-Master — Yu-Gi-Oh Card 16

Published: 2007-08-30 19:50:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 1459; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 19
Redirect to original
Description My second earliest idea, I kinda think it's broken...

[link]
Related content
Comments: 76

ShadowKyogre In reply to ??? [2007-09-09 13:00:57 +0000 UTC]

I love Kirby games!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Luigi-Master In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-09 16:10:06 +0000 UTC]

Yup, a new sexual undertone in a children's game.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Luigi-Master [2007-09-09 18:42:40 +0000 UTC]

...okay...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Luigi-Master In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-09 20:06:58 +0000 UTC]

Well, it is appropriate for something soft and pink to around sucking and blowing random characters, yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Luigi-Master [2007-09-09 21:57:28 +0000 UTC]

Yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Luigi-Master In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-09 22:14:10 +0000 UTC]

That's what I thought.

Well, see ya!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Luigi-Master [2007-09-09 22:39:09 +0000 UTC]

See ya!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Conniving In reply to ??? [2007-09-01 14:18:11 +0000 UTC]

What if the other strong monster is another Wicked Avatar? Does the attack boost only apply to the opponent card's original attack? Either circumstance, what if magic cards powered up the opponent prior to the Avatar's appearance?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-01 15:35:10 +0000 UTC]

Avatar will be the strongest monster, no matter what.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-01 15:36:28 +0000 UTC]

What if there's a second one?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-01 15:38:05 +0000 UTC]

A second Avatar or a second other monster?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-01 18:43:23 +0000 UTC]

Second Avatar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-02 00:11:53 +0000 UTC]

Oh. They just copy off the strongest monster besides The Wicked Avatar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-02 00:54:08 +0000 UTC]

Ah. That makes more sense.

It takes into account the original attack, or amplified attack from traps or spells?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-02 00:57:10 +0000 UTC]

Amplified or original, depending on what monster has the highest besides it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-02 01:01:42 +0000 UTC]

No, I mean would a 1800-ATK monster give The Wicked Avatar 1900 ATK if the former had a Equip Spell Card that gave it a 500 ATK bonus?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-02 01:20:48 +0000 UTC]

I suppose it would still copy off the 1800 ATK Monster. You can look up the Wicked avatar here:
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-03 12:07:36 +0000 UTC]

It would take into account the monster's equip card and have a total of 2400 instead of 1900, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-03 12:13:10 +0000 UTC]

Yup.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-03 12:45:18 +0000 UTC]

Understood. Looks like that monster card earned its power level, then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-03 13:11:31 +0000 UTC]

And that's why it is also my fave!!! Somehow, I predict once it comes out, people will be running 3's.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-03 13:44:56 +0000 UTC]

It'll probably be limited to one per deck if it isn't outright banned from tournament play.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-03 13:55:03 +0000 UTC]

Actually, it's unlimited. And could you tell me what you think of this story here?
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Conniving In reply to ShadowKyogre [2007-09-03 16:41:37 +0000 UTC]

I left the comment there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShadowKyogre In reply to Conniving [2007-09-03 17:08:08 +0000 UTC]

Okay. I'm checking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |