HOME | DD
Published: 2013-01-19 03:37:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 541; Favourites: 10; Downloads: 13
Redirect to original
Description
From a mural in Hollywood, CA.I usually strive for accuracy in the photographs I make of places and things. But the original photograph of this mural (which looks like this sta.sh/0azvlhfx02f ) had so much interference around it that it failed completely in communicating the work. I was struggling in Lightroom and decided to really post the image as if I had the freedom to invade the original artwork as well as its setting. The exercise has much more integrity in Lightroom than in Photoshop where the image itself (not just the presentation) can be completely altered with additions and deletions. I wish Photoshop offered the immediacy and simplicity of Lightroom . The Lightroom controls are so much better for me. In any event, this image is what the mural makes you feel when you look at it standing on its side of the street. It turns Ms. Del Rio into the icon that she is to the Latin community.
This is a short bio of the artist: "Alfredo De Batuc studied arts in Academia de Artes Plasticas in Mexico, and 1975, moved to Mexico City and then Los Angeles. He began exhibiting his work in 1984, both in the U.S as well as globally. His other works include a children’s book about California Missions. (Robin K. Dunitz, Street Gallery, Guide to over 1000 Los Angeles Murals)"
Sadly, here are before and after pictures with restoration unlikely:
Related content
Comments: 9
makepictures In reply to djailledie [2013-01-26 19:20:12 +0000 UTC]
No. There are settings in Lightroom to adjust the "lens" when processing an image shot in RAW format. It does well distorting an image, as I did here, and in fixing flare and in repairing some edge defects. It would be really great if it could find the magic to change depth of field.
If you click on the link in the comments to this deviation you can see the original file from which the "fisheye" image was made.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to makepictures [2013-02-18 06:10:32 +0000 UTC]
Cool tool!
Changing depth of field would be great, as I haven't seen any simple tool to do it, but I'll keep on playing with the camera for that anyway!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
makepictures In reply to djailledie [2013-02-19 19:17:45 +0000 UTC]
This "camera" uses a new technology to permit the receiving sensors to capture data about the light such as to permit variable focus points [link] . It doesn't change depth of field but it provides the capability of changing your point of focus after you take the picture and present the picture so that the viewer can change the point of focus back and forth. Conceptually, a huge change over conventional single image photographic context.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to makepictures [2013-02-21 05:57:57 +0000 UTC]
Oh, yes, I read about this. My initial reaction was to believe that the result would not be good, but thinking more, if they can keep a distance with each pixel - like an autofocus that would work pixel-wise - they can have enough information to rebuild a depth of field afterwards. Well, I wish to try it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
makepictures In reply to djailledie [2013-02-21 16:32:41 +0000 UTC]
Although its a bit like 3D. You need a special viewing apparatus (a computing device and screen) to really engage with the image. For me, that puts too much of a technical burden on use except in special display settings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to makepictures [2013-03-19 05:49:04 +0000 UTC]
Oh, yes, indeed. Fun is for me when I have the camera, not when I hold the mouse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wingsofdragons [2013-01-19 03:44:05 +0000 UTC]
wow what a capture....!!! she looks great .you did a wonderful job
👍: 0 ⏩: 0




















