HOME | DD

Mandolin-Glockens β€” CMSN - Wand miss-use

Published: 2009-07-05 17:27:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 342987; Favourites: 1904; Downloads: 3112
Redirect to original
Description Updating with a new commission.

No more comments.
The story comments itself. xD
Related content
Comments: 202

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to ??? [2023-08-20 11:51:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

artboye In reply to Mandolin-Glockens [2023-08-20 12:49:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to artboye [2023-08-20 13:05:37 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

ultrasqaur [2023-04-11 10:49:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

DannyAndYoko [2023-02-18 15:26:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rebissa In reply to DannyAndYoko [2023-04-09 17:08:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

TaraniaTheAnicomGuy5 [2021-12-04 18:59:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Daphnesecretgarden [2019-02-03 15:20:23 +0000 UTC]

Hahahaha!!!Β  The poor guy ... he really got what he deserved.Β  This is wonderful!Β  I love it!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MolternKirby [2017-10-10 00:00:29 +0000 UTC]

He's a pimp

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RoarktheHalf-Orc [2017-09-22 20:34:02 +0000 UTC]

Should've been satisfied with the first girl, then you wouldn't have been sold off into prostitution.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rphb [2016-09-04 22:39:01 +0000 UTC]

I kind of get the bimbo thing now, it is not that guys want a dumb girl, they just want a kind girl who actually behaves like a women should be and not like a mysandric bitch like most American females are today

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 2

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-07 15:36:06 +0000 UTC]

This was the first bimbo-anything I ever saw.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-07 15:45:52 +0000 UTC]

Yea I didn't really get it for the longest time because I loathe dumb people, but then the truth hit me, it is because we want women to act like women.
Women should be seen not heard, and they shouldn't even be told to make us a sandwich because they would just do it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-07 17:01:56 +0000 UTC]

Shut up and crawl back in your cave, fuckboy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-07 17:32:33 +0000 UTC]

I am a masculinist and I am on a crusade against the rapid misandry that permeates western societies.

The problem is not really women, because they are one of God's children.
No the real problem is feminism, that is derived from Marxism, that is ultimately derived from Luciferianism.

And what is Luciferianism thou may ask?
It is Hatred, but not just hate for this or that, but hate for creation itself

"And God saw every thing that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." Genesis 1:31
This is an axiom thou see, that creation is Good, this is what Luciferians reject

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 4

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-01 19:10:48 +0000 UTC]

I seem to recall a certain Mark 12:30-31

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-01 20:07:00 +0000 UTC]

30Β Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.
31Β The second is this: β€˜Love your neighbor as yourself. There is no commandment greater than these.”
Good verse, it is nice to see someone else that knows the bible. However I don't see the point thou art trying to make by quoting them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-01 20:26:33 +0000 UTC]

I'll let you figure that one out. Clearly, you're a smart boy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-01 20:48:01 +0000 UTC]

I am indeed very intelligent, but I am not a mind reader, and I especially do not understand the irrational mind.
So when thou comes with a non sequitur, thou hast to justify it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-01 20:52:36 +0000 UTC]

It's not a non-sequitur when you actually give it some thought.

Comeon, I thought you were smart.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-01 22:48:50 +0000 UTC]

I know thou think that I don't live up to that but I do, remember I speak against hate, so stop being facetious and instead try to lay thy case

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-01 23:34:11 +0000 UTC]

"yes I am well aware that Muslims don't eat pig, they have this whole aversion for cannibalism."

That sounds like a racist remark at the expense of another people, not something Jesus would do.

But then again: "remember I speak against hate"

Your words, not mine.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-02 08:36:04 +0000 UTC]

well that is not racist for the simple reason that Muslims are not a race.
Islam is an ideology, it is a religion of evil and it is a religion of hate.
Since their founder, the false prophet Muhammed lead the first Jihad against Mecca in 630, Islam have been at war with all of creation.
They struck at us (European/Christians) again and again and again. They raided our shores, rapped our women and kidnapped our children.
If it hadn't been for the bravery and valour of Charles Martel who lead our troops to victory in the Battle of Tours in 732 France would have fallen along with Spain. This was how far they had spread in only a hundred years.
They are a never ending scourge to the Earth, and if thou just opened thine eyes to their true nature, which have been made so apparent from History, thou would see.
It is not a sin, to speak against Evil.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-02 11:04:15 +0000 UTC]

Romans 12:3

I'll just let you keep on digging, man

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-02 13:22:02 +0000 UTC]

Again that is just a non sequitur random bible quote.
The point of that particular quote is that humility is a virtue and hybris is a sin, a fact that I already know quite well.

What doth thou think it have to do with recognising evil?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-02 13:50:16 +0000 UTC]

I could've sworn you were a clever boy to understand the correlation. None of these are non-sequiturs if you take some time and actual thought.

I guess I was wrong to believe that...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-02 14:38:51 +0000 UTC]

no because they are only connected in thy head.
A good man loves God and hates the devil

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-01 22:50:37 +0000 UTC]

I'm just telling it like it is, mate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Yodiros In reply to rphb [2017-07-23 08:31:47 +0000 UTC]

Holy fucking shit

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to Yodiros [2017-07-23 15:03:58 +0000 UTC]

So I trust thou like my argument

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Yodiros In reply to rphb [2017-07-23 19:29:50 +0000 UTC]

eh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to Yodiros [2017-07-23 21:37:03 +0000 UTC]

not the best conversationalist art thou?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Yodiros In reply to rphb [2017-07-23 21:40:17 +0000 UTC]

I can't say I'm interested in talking with you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to Yodiros [2017-07-23 22:33:28 +0000 UTC]

then why start?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

angrygengarplz In reply to rphb [2017-08-01 19:04:34 +0000 UTC]

Because it takes two to keep it going, and you seem pretty interested in doing so, even though the other party clearly isn't

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to angrygengarplz [2017-08-01 20:18:53 +0000 UTC]

I am just trying to awaken people, as I have said elsewhere, misandry is a terrible scourge that will destroy western civilisation if not stopped. And unlike what the post-modernist revisionist wants to tell us, there have never been a civilisation greater and better for the world then the west, and if we allow it to fall, nothing will be left but darkness and misery.
Remember, the term: "White man's burden" was never meant to be ironic or sarcastic. It refers to the sincere and honest burden we, the white men have in enlightening the world and carrying them towards civilisation.
resources.chuh.org/CHHS/allabo…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RedeemerofDark In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 12:19:00 +0000 UTC]

Are luciferians not worshipers of Satan?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 14:10:36 +0000 UTC]

Yes but people that claim to be Satanist openly such as the church of satan, are only a joke religion, like people that claim to worship the flying spaghetti monster. They are just selfish hedonist.

A true luciferian cult is something far more sinister.
Satan merely means antagonist to God, and we might as well have said Ahriman or Mara. There is a multitude of names because it is understood as a multitude of beings. Lucifer is something more specific.
Lucifer was the most perfect of Gods angels and he wanted to usurp heaven. He wanted to replace God's law (objective natural law), with his own (arbitrary power game).
It is the most destructive belief possible, and as I said at its core lies a hatred to all of creation.


As I said genesis 1:31 better then any other verse in the bible define what Christendom is really all about:
"And God saw every thing that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
Creation is good, and there is a reason the world is as it is. Whenever something bad happens, there is a reason why it happens, and we should not despair, and all of the bad things in the world cannot outweigh the good. And existence is always better then non existence. That is why suicide is such a horrible crime. It is to spit on the gift we have been given.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 18:08:33 +0000 UTC]

Okay...you realize its a common misconception that lucifer is the name right? Its the name of a star and happened to get mixed in with the other names for Satan which is why I call him Satan. Its also a common misconception that satanists worship the evil Satan. Rather they believe Satan is a good guy and worship him as such

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 19:59:10 +0000 UTC]

The difference between "Satan" and "Lucifer" Is that Satan is the material incarnation of the devil, representing carnal desires, while Lucifer is the spiritual incarnation of the devil, giving him his philosophical justification.

And the central trait of Lucifer is that of a rebel, a rebel against God, that is against the very concept of Absolute morality and natural Law. Lucifer represents freedom from morality. It is to set himself, and his personal inclination as the final arbiter of what is good and right.
This reduces morality to a power game, but more then that, when taken to its logical extreme it also reduces Truth itself to that.

Few worship Lucifer directly, as only a handful are corrupt and intelligent enough to recognise the logical consequence of their convictions without being persuaded away from them from that insight. Yes Lucifer is Evil, with a capital E, it is the purest definition of Evil that we have.
Many ideologies are derived from Luciferianism: Marxism, Feminism, Social Justice, Atheism.
It is all a rejection of God, a rejection of Absolute Morality and Absolute Truth; and it is in that rejection that one walks in the footsteps of Lucifer.

Of course these people don't think they are evil, it is easy to think that when one reject the very notion of Good and Evil, but it causes untold suffering on every metric

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 20:48:54 +0000 UTC]

...so there is no such thing as "neutral" huh? I have always tried asking christians what happens if someone is neutral when they die but most reject the question rather then try to answer me...also in all of that I couldnt tell if you acknowledged what I said or not but ok...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 21:03:41 +0000 UTC]

No there is no such thing as "neutral". Either one accepts the Absolute as a principle or one rejects it. The thing about Absolutes are that they are always either or, that is the definition of absolute, otherwise it would be relative.

What happens when we die is a different question, I do not know. I do know however what happens when we live, and if we live without God, we are in hell, because Hell is not a place it is a state of mind.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 21:23:32 +0000 UTC]

If one is happy not bothering with people's naive conceptions of black and white and accepts and understand that the world is grey and lives a happy life with there understanding they are still in hell? I find that hard to believe)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 22:36:09 +0000 UTC]

I hear thou art a Satanist.
But let me try change thy mind.

Murder, is an example of a crime that is "malum in se" (evil in itself).
It is not wrong because we have decided it is wrong, and it is not dependent upon circumstances, there are no instance that can justify murder. It is wrong, because it is inherently evil.

And I said thou were a Satanist and not a Luciferian because thou obviously doth not understand the consequences of rejecting the Absolute.
To reject God, means that we have to put the state in Gods place. A true Luciferian is only someone that understands this logical consequence and likes it, because they are the state.
It is the ultimate form of hybris, to want to be God, that is what a Luciferian is, a Satanist is just someone that follows them, like a pawn.

The Truth about the world is that morality is not different from physic. There are stable orbits that a planet can have, and there are unstable orbits, and if the orbit is unstable the planet either collide with its star or is thrown into the empty voids between the stars.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to rphb [2017-06-09 02:31:02 +0000 UTC]

I am agnostic I will have you know...not a Satanist...its naive to think good and evil are absolute I could even say they dont actually exist. But if they do they are on opposite sides of a scale with neutral in the middle (a fence sitter is one who tries to remain neutral) you have to see two sides of a story to judge fairly and have to be neutral as possible to make fair judgement. Anything that isn't that is a biased opinion based off your way of life in one way or another and would never be fair. And "no finite crime deserves infinite punishment" this will never not be the case unless you don't care about being fair to everyone. If that's the case do whatever. Believe in a god who had a barely the original words anymore book or a fallen angel/demon (whoever you want to call them) that actually punishes bad people...bad people punishing bad people...interesting...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-09 04:06:46 +0000 UTC]

Well first of all, we are not talking about "a god" we are talking about "God" thou hast to understand the concept thou art rejecting otherwise thou art just being prejudges.

Second we are not talking about the afterlife, I don't know what happens when we die. We were talking about life and I like to define Hell as st. Augustine defined it as "existence without God" which is a self inflicted position taken by owns rejection of the divine, it is not a punishment for sin and lack of virtue as these things are their own punishment and reward.

Third, I told thee, regarding this question there are no third options, that is what absolute mean. Absolutes are either or, only the relative is a matter of degree.
If we reject God we inevitable puts something else in his place, it can be something like The Earth, Social Justice, the Proletariat Class struggle but it inevitably always ends up being the state, that by that very nature is authoritarian and quite often totalitarian.

Fourth
Is it evil to murder? yes
Is it evil to lie? yes
Is it evil to lie in other to prevent an innocent from being murdered? yes but it is less evil then not too.

St. Augustine made this very good taxonomy of lies

  • Lies in religious teaching
  • Lies that harm others and help no one
  • Lies that harm others and help someone
  • Lies told for the pleasure of lying
  • Lies told to "please others in smooth discourse"
  • Lies that harm no one and that help someone materially
  • Lies that harm no one and that help someone spiritually
  • Lies that harm no one and that protect someone from "bodily defilement"

While lying is evil, there are degrees to how evil it is, just as there are degrees to how serious murder is, which is also reflected in our laws.
First degree murder, second degree murder, manslaughter, unintentional manslaughter, self defence,
I am not saying that all crimes are equal. I am saying we take the Absolute scale of Good and Evil and then do our best to apply it to the different circumstances.

I remember a case from my country that went all the way to the supreme caught that involved a police officer killing his son. His son was a 20 something felon that tried to run over said police officer with a stolen car, and the court confirmed that the police officer did act in self defence and had no other choice but to fire his gun.
But even though circumstances had forced him, he still have to live with having taken another man's life, and that is never okay.
Understand?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to rphb [2017-07-30 15:00:55 +0000 UTC]

I suppose...and he is "a god" just because he is the only god in Christianity does not change that if you look at all religions whilst discussing Christianity then he is still a god just like the gods in the other religions are defined as "a god" or "gods". And as for absolutes who is to say they are absolute? God has killed in one way or another regardless of circumstance and if god is supposed to be abaolute good and can do no wrong then him killing people should be impossible but since it has happened he is not "all good" making the idea of an absolute good deity like "God" impossible in itself if he has done an act always considered evil then he has done evil regardless to what degree and therefore is not all bad. And if hell is a state of mind then where does the devil live and why do people say he lives in hell?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-07-30 19:47:47 +0000 UTC]

I know "Absolute" is a difficult concept to grasp.
When we talk about "God" it is a metaphysical concept. Now different religions don't have different "gods" they have different interpretations of "God". That is the source of all religious conflict.
Two religions with a different relative interpretation of a god, can easily coexist, as there is no real conflict between them, but two religions that both makes an Absolute claim cannot, as they contradict each other, they are incompatible, and the other is the deepest form of blasphemy.
I know that it is the post-modernist view that we should all just get along and be tolerant. But think of it like a territorial dispute. Think of it as two countries that both claim the territory of the other as an intricate part of its nation. Explain to me how these two countries can get along without revoking their claims.
Absolute means that the religion claims everything, which leaves nothing to be outside of it.


Thy second objection was about the problem of evil. And it is not as simple as thou put it.
Killing is not inherently evil, murder is (which is unlawful killing), but there are many just ways to kill someone. Like a soldier that kills his enemies in a just war, two people meeting each other in an honourable duel to the death or an executioner that kills the condemned. These are just three examples of the intentional killing of another human being that is not murder.

As for the Devil, well we can imagine him as a physical entity that lives in some physical underworld, or we can think of it allegorical as the snake that lives in each of our hearts, that tries to tempt us away from straight and narrow path of Good and Righteousness, and towards sin and deprivation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-07 17:40:14 +0000 UTC]

Shut up and crawl back in your cave, fuckboy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-07 20:06:14 +0000 UTC]

Again, very intelligent, I had just been hoping for something better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>