HOME | DD

Mandolin-Glockens — CMSN - Wand miss-use

Published: 2009-07-05 17:27:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 343300; Favourites: 1907; Downloads: 3115
Redirect to original
Description Updating with a new commission.

No more comments.
The story comments itself. xD
Related content
Comments: 202

KTV-Network In reply to ??? [2017-06-07 23:31:38 +0000 UTC]

It's more intelligent than you deserve. Now shut up and fuck off

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 12:21:09 +0000 UTC]

So mean...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 13:48:43 +0000 UTC]

He's a very vocal misogynist, he deserves mean and probably worsw

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 18:09:53 +0000 UTC]

That's a bit much...he voiced that he was a masculinist (whatever that means) and voiced his thoughts on theories he was trying to come up with. I can theorize on how much a dead baby weighs but it doesn't mean I want to kill babies -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 20:34:59 +0000 UTC]

"Yea I didn't really get it for the longest time because I loathe dumb people, but then the truth hit me, it is because we want women to act like women.
Women should be seen not heard, and they shouldn't even be told to make us a sandwich because they would just do it."

That's one of his comments.the way it's worded shows that this isn't a hypothetical, this is how he thinks of women.

"masculinists" and meninists different from misogynists like the alt right is different from neo nazis: very little to not at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 20:49:52 +0000 UTC]

Did he not also say that this was a theoey for why he thinks people like bimbos?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 21:53:32 +0000 UTC]

The way he words it makes it clear that, while he is theorizing that it's the reason people like bimbos, it's also the way he thinks. "WE want women to act like women", for example, instead of they. Also, the fact that he thinks misandry is a widespread problem. It's not, and the relatively few women who are misandrists definitely don't offset the gigantic impact of male privilege.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 21:56:03 +0000 UTC]

No but there are feminists (also known as femininazis) who are ridiculously adamant about women being better then men and blah blah blah...and honestly that is grating, even more so for the women from arpund the women's march that know what feminism actually is. Equal rights for women...not priveleges and things to propel them above all others...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 22:12:45 +0000 UTC]

They aren't enough if an issue to warrant the attitudes this asshole spouts

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 22:22:40 +0000 UTC]

True but its possible to see why aome might believe that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-08 22:28:35 +0000 UTC]

Not really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 22:33:51 +0000 UTC]

I didnt say he was justified...just that ita possible to see how someone got fed up and started to believe that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to RedeemerofDark [2017-06-09 00:41:39 +0000 UTC]

A person like that deserves all the incentives in the world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-09 02:33:45 +0000 UTC]

We are social creatures...negative social things hurt us more then we realize...its why so many who come out of solitude in prisons have a good chance of being mentally damaged or not being able to handle living in the outaide world anymore

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 07:02:02 +0000 UTC]

Thou art just proving my point by acting likre that, thou knows that right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 13:53:56 +0000 UTC]

It's not misandry if it's deserved, you soggy 13th century soup cracker

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 15:36:24 +0000 UTC]

hate is never deserved

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 15:37:43 +0000 UTC]

That's a big fat lie

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 15:50:26 +0000 UTC]

All hate originates from the fundamental Luciferian hatred of creation.
Hate is not a simple emotion like anger, lust or fear that animals can have, it is a powerful second tier emotion and the antithesis to love.
It is a spiritual rather then a material emotion and as such it is endless. Endlessly evil as it seeks destruction of its own sake.
It cannot be justified as Humans cannot commit an eternal crime, and God is Good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-08 16:49:59 +0000 UTC]

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucife…

That's not what Luciferianism is, you're an idiot, and god is a vengeful prick

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 17:04:16 +0000 UTC]

Okay thou link to a wikipedia page that explains what Luciferianism is, and then tell me "that is not what Luciferianism is"- Is thy point that thou art an idiot?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yodiros In reply to rphb [2017-07-23 08:34:17 +0000 UTC]

Who the fuck still says thy, thou, and art?

Use modern day English, using old shit doesn't make you sound smarter, it just makes you sound pretentious.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to Yodiros [2017-07-23 15:03:32 +0000 UTC]

It is to be precise, "you" can refer to so many different things that it is not useful as a pronoum

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to ??? [2016-09-04 23:27:58 +0000 UTC]

Wow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to Mandolin-Glockens [2016-09-04 23:29:57 +0000 UTC]

but I am right right? the "bimbo" troop is just a way to overcompensate in the other direction

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to rphb [2016-09-05 02:03:47 +0000 UTC]

Fetishes are not a rational thing with a clear, simple reason behind them. They're just weird emotional and irrational reactions to ever more weird things.

A lot of fetishes assign a dominant role to one person and a submissive role to another.
Following your logic, the existence of dominatrices, giant women, muscular women, and every single fetish where the woman is the dominant part should mean that they exist to "overcompensate the abundance of misogynist jerks".

But they don't exist to overcompensate anything one way or another.


I find myself mental changes, where people find themselves thinking in a very different way they used to, really amazing by themselves, I don't even care about if that means they become dominant or submissive.
So I find someone turning into a bimbo equally interesting to becoming a genius nerd, an emotionless ninja warrior, a motherly angel, a twisted witch, a little kid, a rabid gorilla, a wacky cartoon character or almost anything you can think.

I don't even like when it becomes a very explicit sexual thing, I'm not very interested in that. xD

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to Mandolin-Glockens [2016-09-05 08:49:01 +0000 UTC]

well my theory about all the troops where the women is the dominant part is a form of satire, like Animal Farm. It takes the typical mysandric bitch and turn her into say, a giant snake lady, that literally eats men, because this is what it feels like to be surrounded by them. Art is always an emotional expression to a societal problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-07 15:39:20 +0000 UTC]

Have you considered that girls aren't kind to you, not because of misanthropy, but because you're a complete ass

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-07 15:43:22 +0000 UTC]

who says women aren't kind to me?
When have this ever been personal?
I was talking about a societal problem.

But if thou want to know more here is an excellent documentary: www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwB…
and this is part two: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOMkl3…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KTV-Network In reply to rphb [2017-06-07 17:02:27 +0000 UTC]

Shut up and crawl back in your cave, fuckboy

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RedeemerofDark In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-08 12:17:09 +0000 UTC]

Yeesh...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rphb In reply to KTV-Network [2017-06-07 17:22:49 +0000 UTC]

that is a really intelligent comback

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtemisXXsimetrA In reply to ??? [2016-07-23 00:17:00 +0000 UTC]

Funny! I couldn't stop laughing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to ArtemisXXsimetrA [2016-07-26 01:38:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

joevsvolc In reply to ??? [2016-02-18 20:20:52 +0000 UTC]

OMG!  What an amazing fantasy!
Where do I sign up?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

deviantartkingof97 In reply to ??? [2015-06-18 03:38:25 +0000 UTC]

LolxD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dalienfail In reply to ??? [2014-08-31 22:07:06 +0000 UTC]

The last panel... Wut.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MountainMan246 In reply to Dalienfail [2015-04-13 00:35:57 +0000 UTC]

It's the internet. That is LITERALLY just the tip of the iceberg for how weird it can get.
XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kmon13 In reply to ??? [2014-08-07 10:07:09 +0000 UTC]

This proves when you have power to use it wisely and not for stupid petty things... now dudes getting a taste of his own medicine as maid himself

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZetaRESP In reply to ??? [2014-01-28 09:33:19 +0000 UTC]

Vacuum cleaner... yeah, I know a couple of guys who are into those habits.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mckenmic In reply to ??? [2013-08-28 20:35:40 +0000 UTC]

o god those last 2 pannels

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

david-dent-jedai In reply to ??? [2012-12-31 20:15:40 +0000 UTC]

Very funny! Loved the twist ending. And the art! O.O You style is very expressive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to david-dent-jedai [2013-01-02 15:02:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! ^__^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

david-dent-jedai In reply to Mandolin-Glockens [2013-01-02 19:39:23 +0000 UTC]

Hey! I like good TG humor. True it's a little kinky but the humor and originality are more than make up for it. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MikeyTurtle In reply to ??? [2012-07-04 14:42:42 +0000 UTC]

Witch have now maid but what happened that bimbo?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mandolin-Glockens In reply to MikeyTurtle [2012-07-06 01:10:51 +0000 UTC]

I guess her future is up to the witch now... Is she even finds about her.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

ZetaRESP In reply to ??? [2012-02-17 06:27:26 +0000 UTC]

Nice going, yoh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

littlemoose123 In reply to ??? [2011-10-18 21:42:27 +0000 UTC]

more

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

littlemoose123 In reply to ??? [2011-10-18 21:42:15 +0000 UTC]

more

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Klydetheless In reply to ??? [2011-05-28 14:30:46 +0000 UTC]

Cute

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>