HOME | DD

MANUSAURIO β€” T-REX JURASSIC WORLD

#drex #trex #jurassicworld #jurassicparktrex #jurassicparkfanart
Published: 2014-11-28 05:57:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 8079; Favourites: 52; Downloads: 119
Redirect to original
Description FEMALE AND MALE
Related content
Comments: 19

grisador [2015-03-31 06:24:53 +0000 UTC]

They are in sane size; Nice !

Bigger female theory is proven False...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to grisador [2015-06-12 16:29:34 +0000 UTC]

let's just say there is no proof that either was bigger. At the moment, in the science community it is accepted that they were the same and not actually dimorphic.

In JP universe, male and female are the same size.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to ak1508 [2015-06-13 10:38:20 +0000 UTC]

Understood ! Β Β 


Wait ?! Really ?! I thought JP Universe puts Female's Bigger :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to grisador [2015-06-13 13:47:54 +0000 UTC]

Nope, there is no canon for it. All Rexes for the first 2 films and JW are same size, with JP3 being smaller. Thats all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Wyvernsaurus In reply to ak1508 [2015-07-25 06:27:51 +0000 UTC]

I always thought Rexy was the biggest T-Rex of the franchise, but still not bigger than the Spino and Indominus.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to Wyvernsaurus [2015-07-25 10:19:51 +0000 UTC]

Nope, Rexy and both T-Rexes from TLWJP are 40-42 ft long. There is a size chart from JW that shows Rexy as being longer, but it's different in various merchandise, so the most accepted is 40-42ft, since thats the way most real adult tyrannosaurus were with the longest being about 42ft. Also, longest =/= biggest. It can be exactly same size in body and have same sized head, but a couple feet longer tail for example, which generally doesn't contribute to the overall size as much as say the mass. To add to it, most of the JW data reffers to the species overall and not a specific specimen.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DrTeaRex In reply to ak1508 [2015-09-20 08:41:29 +0000 UTC]

That being said, Rexy's animatronic IS the largest Rex animatronic made for the Jurassic Park movies, at 43 feet long.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to DrTeaRex [2015-09-20 10:26:44 +0000 UTC]

True, but it's got nothing to do with the size of the animals in the actual movie. That is just a prop/equipment used for filming. Like I said - there is no source material confirming the male or female to be different sizes or female being larger and bla bla bla. The only thing the makers really do confirm, is that they used the original t-rex model, added extra mass to the neck, few details to the head and painted it differently - that's all there is. Everything else is just a fan speculation, but its not canon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador In reply to ak1508 [2015-06-15 13:52:35 +0000 UTC]

Really ?!

That Δ°S relieving and I'm really glad to hear that; Thanks !


I know JPIII Tyranno is a Subadult but I have no idea about the Lost world Pair

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to grisador [2015-06-15 14:05:22 +0000 UTC]

I don't think it is stated anywhere in the Behind the Scenes or in the movie canon that Rexie and the TLW pair are in any way different in sizes. I haven't found anything that states that in the canon. I dont remeber how it wa done in the books, but nook canon and film canon are still different in their own respect though. So, for the time being, it is safe to say that the TLW pair and Rexie were all three fully grown individuals with an approximate length of 40-42 feet (12 meters). The only things that make male t-rex different is the colour, the extra mass on the neck and the slightly different detail on the head, which is not as noticeable as the other two.

JP3 rex wasnt confirmed anywhere to have been a subadult either, just a slightly smaller adult specimen, which is a very common occurance anyway. As much as the lighter green colour can occur as a sign of being younger than TLW male, there is already enough canon to show, that there are colour variations between specimens of the same gender, like in JW Raptor females for example. Also, JP3 Rex is about 11 meters long, most adult Rexes (although not all fully grown to the full size yet) are about 11-12 meters long. Its the stature, not the length, that is more indicative of the t-rex though. Tail length can vary, just as the skull lengths do a lot as well. And proportions among tyrannosaurus specimens are very diverse as well. So, if you project that onto the film material, the JP3 Rex is simply a slightly shorter male t-rex with an alternate colour scheme more specific to males (that is being green). Thats all there is to it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to ak1508 [2015-06-15 18:42:34 +0000 UTC]

Wow; Thanks a LOT for the Δ°nformation !


Its known JPIII is a Subadult male but its odd to see how many people like/d the Big Tyranno Woman subject :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to grisador [2015-06-15 20:20:34 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome mate!

Actually, the only place i ever saw it in, was fan speculation, which is NOT a canon. In Behind the Scenes of JP3 they only say that they used the same animatronic for that scene from TLW male t-rex, but it wasn't stated that the tyrannosaurus was actually a subadult. The only time we see the size is when they released the oficial size guide for dinos from that film - thats it.

If you have a link to anything where it states (canonical source though!) that it is a subadult specimen, then fair enough. Otherwise - its only a speculation, nothing more nothing less.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to ak1508 [2015-06-16 10:26:00 +0000 UTC]




Well; Everyone has their own opinion about the JPIII Tyranno, the most liked one is Subadult (Thought I really like/d the Fight at JPIII, It is a enjoyable movie, I have no idea why everybody creeped out and Angered this much)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to grisador [2015-06-16 10:43:55 +0000 UTC]

I dont want to get into the whole debate here about JPII fight, since it is completely irrelevant. But my point is not about what was "likeable" but what was confirmed by canon source material. Many people might like the dinos in JP to be able to eat icecream, and maybe they did! But it doesnt say so in the canonical source material, hence why I do not take that for granted. Like I said - I only consider canonical source material and the real dino facts and evidence, not the "likeable" fan speculations (although I am also a fan). But anyway, I do hope that at least cleared it up to you in some way or another. Just because that idea is not canonical and not confirmed anywehre doesnt mean you have to stop liking it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to ak1508 [2015-06-16 15:35:36 +0000 UTC]

You're Very right Δ°ndeed ! Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ak1508 In reply to grisador [2015-06-16 15:51:42 +0000 UTC]

And may I add that I would love to see more repaints of those t-rexes by this guy in all skin variations, cause they look absolutely stunning!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to ak1508 [2015-06-17 12:39:59 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely Δ°ndeed ! Β Β 


This Artist's surely talented

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ak1508 [2015-03-01 23:08:03 +0000 UTC]

Make the male version of that pose which you have as a female here, would also look gorgeous!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

saitec22 [2014-12-02 18:08:51 +0000 UTC]

I love the male onceptΒ Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0