HOME | DD

MarkM98 — Bipedal Spinosaurus (updated but still inaccurate)

#dinosaur #paleoart #dinosaurs #italy #spinosaurus #theropod #theropoda #theropods #spinosaurusaegyptiacus #kemkem #andreacau
Published: 2015-08-02 13:54:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 3962; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Probably the most enigmatic theropod, Spinosaurus was a semi-aquatic apex predator, adapted to an aquatic lifestyle. This artwork is inspired by a bipedal interpretation of the animal made by the italian paleontologist Andrea Cau, you can find the relative article here: theropoda.blogspot.com/2014/09…


Reconstruction based on the latest description by Nizar Ibrahim and Cristiano Dal Sasso.
Leingth: 16 m
Ernst Stromer, 1915


Muscioni Marco, 2015
Graphite on paper

2016 version: markm98.deviantart.com/art/Spi…

Please do NOT use my work, it is under copyright.
Related content
Comments: 13

kevinzething [2020-12-10 19:13:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StagBeetleMaster [2017-11-08 16:02:05 +0000 UTC]

Jesus, I really like this reconstruction!
And it isn't inaccurate. 
2.bp.blogspot.com/-5G9wUvmoo4c…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pyroraptor42 [2016-07-01 01:48:45 +0000 UTC]

I wish I could understand that blog entry XD.
This is the second time I see a bidepal Spino, first one was this .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MarkM98 In reply to Pyroraptor42 [2016-07-01 08:37:25 +0000 UTC]

I am really glad you like it, but actually, this Spinosaurus in my gallery is quite inaccurate... and I noticed it only now. 

When I drew it, I was inspired by Cau's interesting ideas, but I completely misunderstood them... I am a real idiot.
In fact, what he meant by "pelican-like pose" was not that the animal could facultatively keep its neck in this position, but there would have been muscles and ligaments that connected the neck directly to the sail... no like in my drawing, but more like these amazing restorations here:

fafnirx.deviantart.com/art/Spi…

jnrncn.deviantart.com/art/Iceb…



Yeah, I badly need to draw a new, more accurate version of this. I think I'm going to do it in the next few days. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyroraptor42 In reply to MarkM98 [2016-07-06 03:19:24 +0000 UTC]

oh I am sorry. Still looks cool tho!
What about this one?
markwitton-com.blogspot.pe/201…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MarkM98 In reply to Pyroraptor42 [2016-07-08 10:02:03 +0000 UTC]

Mark Witton is one of my favourite exponents in paleoart\paleontology. His illustrations are amazing. The Spinosaurus reconstruction in your link is a masterpiece, but it does not represent the 2014 discoveries. As Witton wrote in the caption under the drawing, "this depiction shows Spinosaurus aegyptiacus as generally imagined prior to 2014".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pyroraptor42 In reply to MarkM98 [2016-07-09 01:44:30 +0000 UTC]

oh you're right, my bad XP
I also love this drawing
markwitton-com.blogspot.pe/201…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MarkM98 In reply to Pyroraptor42 [2016-07-10 21:37:42 +0000 UTC]

That's a truly majestic illustration

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador [2015-11-07 11:08:13 +0000 UTC]

Amazing !

This posture is the most accurate one until a new discovery

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MarkM98 In reply to grisador [2015-11-07 13:56:11 +0000 UTC]

Probably yes  
Since Hibraim's specimen and Stromer's "Spinosaurus B" have exactly the same proportions, the new spinosaurus is quite certainly the most correct one. How would it have walked on land? I have some ideas about that:
1) Spinosaurus spent all its life in water, and came on land only to lay eggs, crawling on its belly
2) As suggested by Andrea Cau, from who I took ispiration for this reconstruction, Spinosaurus could balance its body weight by keeping its neck in this position
3) Extremely specialized and super-developed shoulder and arm muscles (and bones) allowed him to walk as a quadrupedal animal like in Hibraim's reconstruction

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to MarkM98 [2015-11-07 21:41:41 +0000 UTC]

Okay than

Well; I am not sure. As the Stromer deemed the fossil is different 'enough' to belong into another theropod species; and there's the sigilmassasaurus thing I recently commented about;

I would pick absolutely the 'S curved neck'-'Pelican' one the 2nd; if the reconstruction is accurate; because all the marshlands, swamps and Delta's; spinosaurus habitat; has seasonal (very harsh) droughts and as far as I know the spinosaurus can't go to open waters, ocean because it would be absolutely defenseless. And as you said the animal has to laid eggs (a new discover about a viviparous dinosaur would be immense thought) and has to protect its nest & hatchlings against predators; as currently known theropods accepted as 'good parents' by all paleontology genre... And the males have to impress females as how modern avians do. They have to do their rituals on land.
[(however how much I personally have my own theory about 'precocial'-''super precocial'' infant dinosaurs; completely capable of looking themselves; or have to look themselves.)]

However; I am definitely see the Quedrupedality as a 'wrong' theory because the animal's claws are completely not suited for a perfect quedrupedal locomotion. The animals arms so far; seemingly can't support the animal on land-aren't designed for a walking so far.
If you want to compare; compare spinosaurus 'claws' into gorilla 'arms'

Gorilla:
www.cgsociety.org/cgsarchive/n…
farm1.static.flickr.com/179/45…
c1.staticflickr.com/9/8073/833…

Spinosaurus :
thenypost.files.wordpress.com/…
www.washingtonian.com/blogs/af…

The spinosaurus arms are advanced but definitely not suited for a 'knuckle walking' gorilla type of locomotion.

The ''Pelican'' is the best answer so far to explain spinosaurus by both its behaviore & locomotion; IF the national geographic's reconsteuction is accurate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lolIstink In reply to grisador [2016-01-04 12:26:24 +0000 UTC]

National Geographic is definitely not a very reliable source. Check out their 'dinosaur' shows

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

grisador In reply to lolIstink [2016-01-23 19:19:29 +0000 UTC]

Almost all of them is about Tyrannosaurus...

Still more watchable than obvious documentary channels; or so called documentary channels :9

👍: 0 ⏩: 0