HOME | DD
Published: 2010-10-06 00:50:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 1974; Favourites: 37; Downloads: 27
Redirect to original
Description
COPICs on COPICpaperRelated content
Comments: 36
PoppycockFanatic13 [2011-08-08 09:12:45 +0000 UTC]
He looked so cute with a mullet lol I love this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Olivia-the-Dark [2010-10-28 02:03:38 +0000 UTC]
this one is great. c: its in more of a high-contrast style, and youve captured macca very well. ;3 <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to Olivia-the-Dark [2010-10-28 12:20:37 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, dear. It was fun to draw him with that ridiculous haircut
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MasterLen In reply to Nodding [2010-10-09 20:26:38 +0000 UTC]
would you really want that? o_o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nodding In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-09 20:29:08 +0000 UTC]
YES.
Lol, j/k. Hey, are you ever going to get on yahoo messenger?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to Nodding [2010-10-09 20:32:11 +0000 UTC]
uh. yes. but not today. it's late and i want to draw.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nodding In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-09 20:33:13 +0000 UTC]
Alrighty, sorry to bother you with that, I was just wondering.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to Nodding [2010-10-09 20:41:13 +0000 UTC]
no problem. we'll be chatting soon. promise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to arctic-sunsett [2010-10-06 20:10:43 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, dear. I also loved his eyelashes when I saw the ref for the first time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
KoopaCake101 In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-16 23:31:14 +0000 UTC]
HOLY GOD PAUL IS IN THE REF???
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to KoopaCake101 [2010-10-17 11:38:48 +0000 UTC]
What? o_o
(Sorry my english is much too bad to understand every comment.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KoopaCake101 In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-17 17:34:57 +0000 UTC]
Paul McCartney is in The Ref?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to KoopaCake101 [2010-10-17 17:51:21 +0000 UTC]
Uh no. I meant ref = reference
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to KoopaCake101 [2010-10-17 19:28:33 +0000 UTC]
It's okay.
But now you have to explain me what 'The Ref' is ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KoopaCake101 In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-17 20:00:56 +0000 UTC]
It's a movie from 1994. It's effing hilarious, but the way Wikipedia puts it makes it sound completely opposite.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arctic-sunsett In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-06 22:14:06 +0000 UTC]
No problem! Paul's eyeslashes are love XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to Hot-Sox [2010-10-06 01:07:03 +0000 UTC]
thanks! it was interesting because the ref was so overexposed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to Hot-Sox [2010-10-06 13:03:38 +0000 UTC]
Uh. *looks at his english dictionary*
The photo was... overexposed -.-"
It had too much light what caused an interesting effect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hot-Sox In reply to MasterLen [2010-10-06 22:46:24 +0000 UTC]
OHHHHH XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD wow Lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to Hot-Sox [2010-10-06 23:14:12 +0000 UTC]
Damn! I hate my bad english >_<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MollyMoo12 [2010-10-06 00:51:55 +0000 UTC]
One second, let me MULLET over! AH HA HA ha ha haaa... That was bad... BUt this is really good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterLen In reply to MollyMoo12 [2010-10-06 00:55:53 +0000 UTC]
Hehe! 'The awesome MulletPower!'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0

























