HOME | DD
MattX125 — Deep State Cures - Ben Garrison
#ben #chrona #garrison #gates #sam #uncle #virus #bill #bengarrison
Published: 2020-03-15 21:52:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 6647; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
Drawn by Ben Garrison I own nothing.
Share. Fave. Fight.
I have been given "proper permission" to post this www.deviantart.com/mattx125/ar…
I'm sorry that haven't been posting Ben Garrison art or Branco art recently. I can't keep up and I have other things I want to do. So here is more "recent" postings that I picked to share. If you want to see more of his art then please go to his website. www.grrrgraphics.com/
(Below are Ben Garrison's words not mine. If you want to see more of Ben Garrison's art, please go to his website. www.grrrgraphics.com/ )
From This link: www.grrrgraphics.com/deep-stat…
Deep State Cure
Bill Gates, whose net worth is over $100 billion, once remarked that vaccines could reduce world population by 10 to 15 percent.
Bill is a member of the ‘Big Club.’ He’s an unelected world leader. He and his fellow controllers at the top of the pyramid pretty much own the planet. It’s theirs. They want it turned into their own personal paradise. They don’t want more ‘useless eaters’ and more polluting humans mucking things up. That’s why Gates pushes GMO foods and 5G. The latter is a lot more concerning than the current coronavirus.
The vaccine-obsessed Gates recently warned that the coronavirus may be the ‘once-in-a-century pathogen we’ve been worried about’ I doubt he’s worried about it at all. It’s probably all going according to plan. One of Gates’ allies will come up with a special vaccine that would cure it and who knows…maybe lawmakers will make such a shot mandatory. California has already accomplished that tyranny. We should have control over our own bodies and what goes into them, but the Big Club would turn us into their citizen cattle.
The scientific, corporate, and political ‘authorities’ love vaccines. Through their propaganda they’ve made it seem as if the human immune system is no longer trusted–even though millions of years have been invested in its development. Suddenly, we’re told it needs endless help via needle jib jabs. The vaccine ingredients include mercury, aluminum, aborted fetal and animal cells, and a litany of other junk mostly ignored by doctors and patients alike. Just shut up and take your damn shot! You’re not anti-science, are you? That’s the militantly angry reaction from authorities when vaccinations are questioned.
The tremendous upswing in dementia could be caused by an aluminum build-up in the brain. Autism is off the charts. Chemical bombs are going off in brains of children due to over vaccination. There is plenty of evidence pointing to the barbarity of vaccination, yet those who merely question vaccines are smeared as conspiracy theorists and nut jobs.
I don’t trust the CDC. Those who run it come and go through revolving doors, trading positions with Big Pharma. I don’t trust the World Health Organization and its ties to a UN globalist agenda. I don’t trust the Chicoms. I don’t trust any vaccine coming out of China. I don’t trust the corporate mass media who brainwash people into taking constant flu shots. I particularly distrust Bill Gates, who comes from a pro-abortion, pro-eugenics family. By the time he does bring about a vaccine, the current virus will most likely have mutated—like most flu viruses. The vaccine will be useless. A patient may recover from the flu, but the junk in the vaccines will stay their bodies until death. They may even cause people to die sooner than later. That’s what the Big Club wants. Just take a look at their Georgia Guidestones. They enjoy telling us what they want to make happen.
It could be that the virus is a distraction—a crisis for us to focus on while they pull other shenanigans. The conspiracy theories are myriad, but I’m sure of one thing: The cure will be worse than the disease.
531
Related content
Comments: 41
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Together we are strong
good to see another awake person here
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
I don't blame you when it comes to the CDC. Many people are buying into Big Pharma and it almost drives me to self-destruction, not that I have a desire to destroy myself to escape the incredible lives we live.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
I'm sorry, but you are out of your mind. There is just... so much wrong here I don't even know where to start. Do your own research.
👍: 2 ⏩: 2
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Vaccinations should be voluntary, not mandatory
👍: 4 ⏩: 3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That would be true if and only if diseases could not spread to other people AND no preexisting conditions exist that can render vaccines unsafe.
But neither of these things are true. There are people who legitimately cannot get vaccines for health reasons such as immunodeficiency. To prevent diseases from spreading to them, a large number of people need to be vaccinated.
Your right to swing your arm stops where other peoples' noses begin. Similarly, your right to not be vaccinated ends where other peoples' health begins.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
You just admitted that vaccinations can hurt people.
That's exactly why they shouldn't be mandated.
👍: 3 ⏩: 2
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
And that's not an entirely faulty assumption, and I can understand the logic behind it. But these preexisting conditions tend to be pretty obvious and easily found, and even when they're not - see people being allergic to it and not noticed before injection - these unfortunate cases are vastly preferable to the alternative.
Remember how many people died to smallpox? Tetanus?
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
So you admit to sacrificing the few at the benefit of the many, at least you're honest about it.
What are you planning to do to reimburse the people you hurt?
👍: 3 ⏩: 1
Yes. Is that such a horrible thing? Because here's the rub: If you don't sacrifice a few to benefit many, then that directly means you're sacrificing many to benefit few. Not even speaking of how, if we were to shut down all vaccine programs this very instant, people who can't get vaccines would still be at risk of getting diseases, but now even higher than before, due to the 'right to swing your arm' effect I explained to you earlier.
So really, it's not even 'sacrificing few to benefit many'. It's choosing to benefit as many people as possible, but not being able to get to 100%.
Why do I have to reimburse anyone? I'm not sacrificing anyone and I'm not hurting anyone. But from my understanding, there is a government program for reimbursement in such a scenario, hrsa.gov.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
You're free to feel that way but I'd rather there be a situation where people who are at risk don't have to get vaccinated while the people who aren't get the vaccine.
Instead of your idea where you just force it on everyone and then pay for the damages later.
👍: 3 ⏩: 1
"I'd rather there be a situation where people who are at risk don't have to get vaccinated while the people who aren't get the vaccine."
Well, uh, if I'm not mistaken that's the situation today, and it's also precisely my idea too. Sorry for the confusion. For starters stuff like autoimmune disorder tend to be, uh, noticeable. And there are tests to check if you'll have an allergic reaction.
Mistakes do happen and while the tests may be sound, the test givers are human. Which I can only imagine is why the HRSA exists.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
But there isn't a definitive way of knowing how a vaccine can negatively affect someone, everyone's DNA is different.
If there were tests that could be administered beforehand that guarantee no harm will be done to an individual, I'd be more supportive of mass vaccinations.
But seeing as no such test currently exists, you can understand why people would be skeptical to such a large scale government encroachment into people's bodies.
The left loves to talk about keeping "the government's hands off of people" when it comes to abortion but are all for it when it comes to injecting people with micro-viruses.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"But there isn't a definitive way of knowing how a vaccine can negatively affect someone, everyone's DNA is different.
If there were tests that could be administered beforehand that guarantee no harm will be done to an individual, I'd be more supportive of mass vaccinations."
I've got great news!
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic…
Is this 100%? No, of course not. But if we'd waited for something to be 100% before starting the vaccines, we'd all still be living in fear of smallpox.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
You can't administer an allergic reaction test until you develop the vaccine first.
If these preventative tests were administered before any mandatory vaccinations I'd be more supportive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm guessing you typod, and meant 'injected' the vaccine first, right?
It's not usually common practice, but I have a hard time imagining a doctor would flat-out say "No" when someone asks "Can we run an allergic reaction test on me/my child before administering it?". But this is getting into some supremely abstract concepts of "How much is it on the patient to educate themselves and how much is it on the who-knows-whoever to make that info available and blah blah blah".
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
No, I mean developed, because the coronavirus vaccine has yet to be perfected.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah, fair enough. Got confused what you meant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0