HOME | DD
MattX125 — Free Assange by Ben Garrison
#ben #garrison #jullian #times #york #wikileaks #assange #new
Published: 2019-06-06 01:49:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 7240; Favourites: 90; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description
Drawn by Ben Garrison I own nothing.
Share. Fave. Fight.
I have been given "proper permission" to post this www.deviantart.com/mattx125/ar…
From this link: grrrgraphics.com/free-assange-…
*(Note: Let's make this very clear right now, this is not mine as I own nothing here as I didn't draw this masterpiece. This rightfully belongs to Ben Garrison its original owner and creator. I'm merely sharing it on this site.)*
Free Assange
In the movie “The Post,” Tom Hanks played JFK’s friend, executive editor Ben Bradlee.
The film portrayed him, his reporters, and the owner of The Washington Post as heroes for publishing secrets from the Pentagon Papers — despite Nixon’s threat of legal action. The movie mostly snubbed The New York Times. After all, it was the Times who broke the story—and they won a Pulitzer Prize in 1972 for their effort—but for some reason the movie centered on the Post.
Regardless, journalism has changed considerably since then. Newspapers have encountered drastic reductions in advertising and readers. Newspapers also cut back on investigative journalism due to its expense and tendency to attract lawsuits. It was easier for newspapers to play it safe and run politically correct, homogenized, canned material. Their lack of risk taking contributed to a further decline in readership.
Support MAGA Cartoons for 2020 Join us on SubscribeStar a free speech alternative to Patreon
Television news has also lost its credibility. Corporate media on the boob tube are handed talking points by the Deep State, the CIA, and the globalist forces. The talking heads are no longer journalists—they’re puppets paid to parrot scripted talking points. It’s why we often hear them spouting their propaganda slogans all at once, most recently the phrase ‘we’re in a Constitutional crisis!’ which was repeated by all of them after the Mueller Report flop.
Real investigative journalism now takes place on the Internet. Many of the journalists there toil for little or no pay as they receive harassment, de-platforming and even death threats. Whistleblowers are no longer rewarded but instead threatened with jail time. Obama was infamous for cracking down on whistleblowers.
Fight Back against Fake News! Support Cartoons that shred the Democrat Narrative! Click to Donate
The corporate media think they get to decide who are journalists and who are not. They claim Assange is not a journalist, but they’re wrong. His work is no different from what the New York Times did 50 years ago. They won Pulitzer Prizes, while Assange wins jail time and even the threat of execution. We know that Hillary, the bloodthirsty butcher of Gaddafi, wanted a drone to execute him at the Ecuadorian embassy. She and her Deep State want him silenced—perhaps permanently.
FREE ASSANGE!
—Ben Garrison
*(Note from me: Want to stop Socialism and keep America pure and free from Socialism? Visit this website to see the ugly truth of the poison the Left is peddling: Stopping Socialism -)*
(One more thing, this would fit every last one of these false, Leftists gods: www.youtube.com/watch?v=H25i
360
Related content
Comments: 33
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is an example of Neo-Roman scum. An old midlife crisis man tryin' to be hip with the kids by talkin' 'bout internet groups like WikiLeaks.
Since I'm a radical centrist, I see that both the left and the right are fuckin' stupid, here. You Alt-Right thugs just go on this website and lie. Most of the shit you say is made up. Also, don't listen to Alex Jones. He makes shit up and he also caused his fans to go harass the families of the Sandy Hook victims. If you'd just wake up, stop being Alt-Right, stop sayin' that it's a sin to be a liberal, go towards the center, and stop lying, then the Western world will be a better place.
You're all Neo-Roman Alt-Right right wing NPC thugs and you don't fucking belong in America. Get the fuck out of America. Unite or die.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Who defines the goalposts of for defining “Centrism”? I define Tim Pool as a Centrist, and you don’t sound like him much at all. Without a universal fixed standard for the goalposts, “left/center/right” designations become meaningless, chaotically confusing claptrap.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Your definition of centrist is something I disagree with. I'll stick to my definition of a centrist and I won't let people tell me that my goalposts are wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Goalposts that are not a universal standard are meaningless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Trump must be part of the 'Deep State', dumped Assange once he was arrested:
October 10, 2016 in Wilkes-Barre, PA: "This just came out," Trump said. "WikiLeaks, I love WikiLeaks."
October 12, 2016 in Ocala, FL: "This WikiLeaks stuff is unbelievable," Trump said. "It tells you the inner heart, you gotta read it."
October 13, 2016 in Cincinnati, OH: "It's been amazing what's coming out on WikiLeaks."
October 31, 2016 in Warren, MI: "Another one came in today," Trump said. "This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove."
November 4, 2016 in Wilmington, OH: "Getting off the plane, they were just announcing new WikiLeaks, and I wanted to stay there, but I didn't want to keep you waiting," said Trump. "Boy, I love reading those WikiLeaks."
After Assange on Thursday was arrested and charged with one count of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion , Trump in the Oval Office said, "I know nothing about WikiLeaks. It's not my thing."
www.businessinsider.com/trump-…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, Assange begged to be kept under 24 hour watch, which is normally only IMPOSED on suicidal suspects, or ones with a high risk probability of assassination via subterfuge.
Assange has been getting that surveillance, or had been two weeks ago. I’ve heard no follow up on the matter. But it’s an encouraging sign that Trump is again playing a clever and cautious game.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
At the moment Assange is not jailed for anything relating to the illegal removal and distribution of classified materials but for jumping bail in order to avoid being extradited to Sweden to face legally filed criminal charges of sexual misconduct including with a minor.
Those within his little cult of personality can whine all they care to that this was ‘part of a grand conspiracy’ but unless they can produce objective verifiable evidence to support that assertion they are simply calling those women liars without justification and should be ashamed of themselves for doing so.
This oversimplification and direct misrepresentation of the actual situation is little more than meaningless propaganda offered by those who wish to promote their ‘Big Brother conspiracy ideology’ while asking that he be allowed to avoid facing his accusers in court as any other person must do.
The difference is that the authors of that 1972 series of articles publicizing the US involvement in southeast Asia was either classified nor was it covered under rational security regulations and they did they violate any laws in publishing what they had discovered.
For his disclosure of the Pentagon Papers, Ellsberg was initially charged with conspiracy, espionage, and theft of government property, but the charges were later dismissed after prosecutors investigating the Watergate scandal discovered that the staff members in the Nixon White House had ordered the so-called White House Plumbers to engage in unlawful efforts to discredit Ellsberg. ["The Watergate Story". The Washington Post. Watergate prosecutors find a memo addressed to John Ehrlichman describing in detail the plans to burglarize the office of Pentagon Papers defendant Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist, The Post reports. "Pentagon Papers Charges Are Dismissed; Judge Byrne Frees Ellsberg and Russo, Assails 'Improper Government Conduct'". The New York Times. May 11, 1973]
Assange aided and abetted people in illegally removing classified materials that did in fact violate numerous legal statues then used his media outlets to manufacture a cult of personality around himself to garner public support such as this to try and seek a false perspective that he is being ‘persecuted’ for those illegal acts when he is being prosecuted at the moment for other crimes one of which he comitted in plain view i. e., violating his bail by leaving the country as a foreign embassy is another country’s territory.
Sadly what those who have bought into Assange’s little ploy are trying to promote is little more than the utterly ridiculous idea of ‘you shouldn’t prosecute him for anything because he panders to our ‘Big Brother’ ideology.
Assange had his day in an English court and is now serving 51 weeks in prison for violating his legal bail given by a standing English magistrate.
In all likelihood the Swedish prosecutors will re-file those sexual misconduct charges he tried to avoid and he will be extradited to that country to face trial there where his conduct in trying to skirt the scales of justice will garner him a very long prison sentence there as well.
What happens then is anyone’s guess but this pathetic and flawed pretense that his actions are in any manner the same as what took place early four decades ago is not merely laughable it is asinine as I lived through both episodes ad they are nothing alike.
Assange is a criminal who violated his bail in full public view until his immature and juvenile conduct wore out his welcome and that Ecuadorians tossed him out on the street to face justice.
We will have to wait a little longer to learn if he is also a convicted sexual predator once the Swedes get their hands on him but then that is how the justice system works not according to the whims of people who are willing to ignore anything if it casts even the slightest shadow on their manufactured ‘cult hero’.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You should at least acknowledge that Assange HIMSELF believes somebody’s trying to kill him, or else WHY spend more time in the embassy then he would have in prison if he had been convicted right away? Call him crazy but don’t call him a liar.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
“You should at least acknowledge that Assange HIMSELF believes somebody’s trying to kill him,”
I have little reason or interest in what anyone ‘believes’ as that in and of itself does not relate to objective, verifiable reality in almost any manner. There exist people who firmly and deeply ‘believe’ that the earth is a flat disc as well as that NASA and the entire world’s scientific community is engaged in a global conspiracy to ‘hide the truth’. Creationists ‘believe’ in direct, willful contradiction of the wealth of existing evidence that the universe is a mere 6,000 years old magically created by a ‘god-creature’ they are totally unable to show really exists except through exercises in mental masturbation and overt deception. And that list goes on almost endlessly therefore whatever anyone ‘believes’ is immaterial to what actually is unless you or they can show they are suffering from a mental break.
Whether or not Assange ‘believes’ that there is a ‘conspiracy’ to kill him, although to what purpose that would serve now that he has already revealed certain material remains to be seen, is not the issue here. More objectively this demonstrates that either he is delusional or that he is expressing a concocted excuse to cover his actions in an attempt to avoid extradition to Sweden where he would have faced criminal charges relating to rape of one woman and sexual misconduct with an underage girl.
One can easily apply Occam’s Razor in this case to assess the potentiality and plausibility of each idea. On one side we have an idea, i.e., an assassination plot, for which not a shred of rational, confirmable evidence exists supporting it while on the other there are the sworn statements of two women and the accompanying evidence that supports their claims that were assessed by a prosecutor and sitting magistrate who then filed criminal charges. Add to that Assange’s illegal action of skipping bail to hide in an embassy where he repeatedly exposed himself to public view which made him a clear target to even a paid patsy in the crowd and the available evidence indicates that the entire ‘conspiracy theory’ simply does not stand up to critical review. Were he truly in fear of his life such he’d likely never have exposed himself but his psychological need to bask in the adoration he had generated due to his cult of personality drove him to frequently appear in the open before his gathered supporters. That is not the actions of someone in desperate fear of their safety and life from clandestine agencies capable of almost anything but those of a childish mind seeking attention.
“or else WHY spend more time in the embassy then he would have in prison if he had been convicted right away?”
First and foremost this is the fallacy of shifting the burden of proof as well as a desperate attempt to avoid dealing with his illegal actions. Assange, and any of his supporters, must demonstrate that such an alleged ‘assassination plot’ exists or at the very minimum produce the psychiatric evaluation that indicates he in fact is suffering from such a serious delusional state. What you are doing is the exact same thing that creationists do when they know that they cannot present objective, verifiable evidence to support their mythological beliefs which is trying to attack the science, or in this case the reality of Assange’s actions, hoping that if they can create the illusion that the other side is wrong they’ll, you’ll, win by default. That isn’t how reason and logic functions but it is how people trying to prop up their supportive beliefs function.
In the view of many of those not immersed in the Assange cult of personality, myself included, it is not that his ‘liberty was limited’ in a sense due to his self-imposed ‘exile’ in the Ecuadorian embassy for a longer period than he might have faced at trial but the damage to his reputation such a court appearance would have generated. Regardless of the outcome his such a trial his character would have been exposed to massive scrutiny in the world’s media possibly causing many among his followers to walk away from him. That is something he appears to have been unwilling to risk in any manner whatsoever.
Assange is almost certainly a narcissist of very high order, a person who has garnered the adoration and elevated esteem of a small group of people that fed on itself until he simply could not risk being exposed as a base criminal and immoral predator in a court of law. Instead he concocted all manner of conspiracy theories as excuses rather than facing his accusers yet when faced with that prospect he fled hoping that time was on his side and his devotees would rescue him.
That all failed due to his own actions when a new Ecuadorian government grew tired of his antics and abuse to revoke his status and allow the British justice system to take him into custody.
“Call him crazy but don’t call him a liar.”
In point of fact I can and do assess him as both. I see him as being slightly mentally unbalanced driven to bask in a false sense of self-inflated ego due to a cult of personality his narcissism has created and his actions have manufactured as well as a self-obsessed person who will create any illusion that he feels serves his purpose. Add to this his actions and juvenile conduct while a ‘guest’ of the Ecuadorian government such as refusing to care for his own pet, demanding special treatment, threatening that government when his demands were not met and smearing his feces on the walls in an infantile gesture or rather a tantrum. His actions speak far louder than anything that comes out of his mouth as I have stated above.
Sadly I see almost every attempt made by those trying to excuse, amend or dismiss Assange’s conduct and actions as little more that quasi-religious apologetics willing to ignore objective reality to prop up and bolster what they wish to be reality rather than what is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I’m a bigger fan of Hanlon’s Razor myself, which is where I think Assange probably went wrong by not using more of. But while he overestimates the general competence of governments in general, he has been spot on in their resulting actions, regardless of how they came to be driven to those actions, be it probable bungling or improbable malicious scheming. It’s also an appalling tragedy that, if you are right, it only proves that the Media industry is corrupt to the core, branches and roots that it took such a narcissist to get ANY major investigative journalism done AT ALL, until recently anyway. Project Veritas is proving to be ethically superior to how Wikileaks did things, regardless of what happens to Assange. If you don’t like their priorities, well, too bad Assange is going up the river. Whatever else he is, he did prioritize stories that supported his moderate leftist perspective. That could have balanced out Veritas’ conservative focus.
SOMEBODY has to do this work, as serious, high risk investigative journalism has simply disappeared from the MSM.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
“I’m a bigger fan of Hanlon’s Razor myself”
That does seem to be a reasonable assessment here but the point I am making is that his rather far reaching, nay ridiculous conspiracy theories regarding governmental plots are little more that pathetic and petty fantasies he has built of sand to further promote himself. Although Assange might well be that ‘stupid’ in relation to such situations. Einstein remarked “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”
“improbable malicious scheming”
Other than this rather empty assertion with regard to the ‘government’ do you in fact possess or can you point to anything objective and verifiable to support it?
“It’s also an appalling tragedy that, if you are right, it only proves that the Media industry is corrupt to the core, branches and roots that it took such a narcissist to get ANY major investigative journalism done AT ALL, until recently anyway.”
How so when since Geraldo Rivera started the trend of sensationalism over impartiality in order to both promote himself as well as to mask the string of network sponsored failures he engaged in? It is no wonder in this age of near instant gratification of sensory input and access to far more media than anyone could possibly review that such pandering self-promoters such as Assange have been able to draw in a minor host of self-deluded sycophants. Nearly a century ago when radio was in its infancy several ‘preachers’ and ‘mediums’ made fortunes and gathered hordes of devoted followers until the succumbed to the vice they’d railed against or otherwise revealed themselves to be just as corrupt and flawed as Assange.
“Project Veritas is proving to be ethically superior to how Wikileaks did things, regardless of what happens to Assange.”
Perhaps but James Edward O'Keefe III is a very conservative political activist whose outlet reflects a significant bias such that the term ‘impartial’ cannot justifiably be assigned to him or that organization. At least in my view.
“If you don’t like their priorities, well, too bad Assange is going up the river.”
I am uncertain as to whether or not you mean me personally here.
“Whatever else he is, he did prioritize stories that supported his moderate leftist perspective.”
That might be the case but that also indicates that he is promoting a strongly biased point of view despite his assertions to the contrary.
“That could have balanced out Veritas’ conservative focus.”
Here I disagree as in general those you follow Assange’s Wikileaks just as those you rely on O’Keef’s Veritas do not give much credence or time to the other side as they view things frequently in an ‘us versus them’ dichotomy.
“SOMEBODY has to do this work, as serious, high risk investigative journalism has simply disappeared from the MSM.”
I agree with some minor reservations mainly relating to criminal actions taken with regard to such investigations. For the most part it has been my experience that those trying to manufacture ‘arguments’ in support of Assange are willfully ignoring any and all aspects of his overt criminal and infantile conduct under what I term the ‘you can’t hold him accountable because we like him’ construct. They simply refuse to deal with the reality of the overall situation to create out of whole cloth a fantasy that he is some sort of ‘messiah’ and that everything said about his that is not praise equates to lies and propaganda. They will often go so far as to offer support for the ‘Me Too’ movement then immediate turn into vicious trolls when allegations of Assange’s sexual misconduct are raised claiming that those women are willing and corrupt pawns of a government plot.
But yes it does seem that the days of serious, hard hitting journalists has passed by replaced by hacks seeking their own fame at whatever cost.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sigh. We are just going to have to do our best checking and balancing what precious little investigative journalism we DO have, and in the absence of a multifaceted organization making it slightly easier for unbiased journalists to find the courage to do it, and get paid well for it, than only people driven by personal obsessions are likely to be motivated, in large part, to do it from a small, unprofitable organization, such as Assange’s narcissistic love of special attention, or O’Keeth’s conservative activism.
Unbiased objectivism is a dwindling resource we just have to cope without.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Unfortunately I think that you might be correct in your general assessment on the current state of affairs in the media outlets of today.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's rare that I comment on political pieces, but this is why journalism and certain media websites are being replaced by YouTubers and smaller, more truthful news media made by YouTubers. I find it even more hilarious when the YouTube staff actually try to force their news media, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, and so on, down our throats by putting their videos up front on the home page. Even when they try to censor people they only create the desire for the person they're trying to censor to be seen more. It just shows how far they have fallen and with how this pictures looks, it seems as if leftists/democrats only like when their seen as the good guys. Anyone else who tries to be a hero, especially today, is simply in the way and deserves death.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
Julian, Eduard, and Bradley were the first Targets, Alex was the second, and now Steven, Dave, Paul, Sargon, Tommy, and Dankula are Number 3. Who's going to be next?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Pfffff, putting people who exposed US warcrimes in the same category as some dumb right wing shills is laughable
Also her Name is Chelsea Manning. At least when you pretend to care about what these people did, show some respect and get their name right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Actually I blame Assenge for Manning because Assenge NEVER BOTHERED TO WARN MANNING THAT THE LAW WAS CLOSING IN!
Think about it - Assenge somehow and miraculously made it to where ever it was he hid out for all these years yet Manning apparently was arrested before the ink on any warrants had dried. If those two were able to communicate top secret information to each other then one should have been able to warn the other of any potential trouble.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
My point is they’re all journalists. Yeah I know Bradley became Chelsea in prison. That wasn’t the point moron. I don’t care about that.
They’re coming after all of us, slowly but surely. And the fact that you care more about which side they’re one and what’s between they’re legs shows you’re glaring ignorance.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
If you actually care about Chelsea and her work you'd user her real name.
Julian, Edward and Manning, exposed war crimes. Sargon, Paul, and Alex are frauds, who push right wing BS to sell pills.
And no, Putting these two different group together is dishonest and the least you can do when supposedly "Caring" about manning work is get her gender right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fine. I respect Blair White. I can also respect Pvt. First class Chelsea Manning.
Alex Jones was a journalist long before he was selling supplements. He did a Documentary on the Elites secret societies long before infowars even existed. 2003 I believe. Even got footage of their strange ceremonies from across the river from the actual location. Creepy stuff. In a just world he would’ve won awards for his work.
Instead he was fired from NBC and blacklisted from the MSM. He formed Infowars less than a year later.
Carl aka Sargon, PJW, and Alex are not frauds. Infowars needed to sell supplements because ad revenue wasn’t a viable option because of the mainstream collusion. And Sargon never sold any, he is/ was a youtuber. Shows what you know.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Ehh, white is pretty vapid in most points, cant wait for her to expose Dave Rubin though
Maybe so, but to say he's not just a massive shill for his brand is a bit absurd. And out of all the people, his banning from Youtube was the most justified given the amount of harassment his rhetoric brought to the sandy hook survivors families. Also the footage from the ceremony shows nothing but what is basically a fraternity ceremony but for old rich and powerful people. It's an exclusive club and pretty much no more.
Sargon has turned on his supposed friends multiple times, PJW once again pushes BS supplements and also lies constantly (Check out Hbomber guys video on him, not to mention all the times he's been debunked on climate change). Most if not all their supplements are jokes, much of them containing soy, which they seemingly despise... bit hypocritical hmm?
Theres nothing to gain from them other than conspiracy laden bs and dumb tired out anti sjw rhetoric thats gone completely stale. And comparing it to exposing US combat fighters killing civilians and first responders is a joke to these peoples work. Especially considering how Edwards living in exile, Assange is most certainly gonna go to Jail, and Chelsea is in jail for not testifying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Climate Change is something I will not touch. Because it's been Bunked, Debunked, and the science of it manipulated on both sides. The fact that 14 Climatologists died "Under mysterious circumstances" after a 2 year expedition to Antartica tells me absolutely loud and clear the elites DO NOT want the truth to be known on the matter, whatever it may be.
Alex became a tad bit of a monster who hunts monsters yeah I can agree on that, but wouldn't YOU if everyone who mattered in your life turned away from you and you were harassed by the blue-haired freak crowd non-stop? I honestly feel a little sorry for him. I didn't want to see him silenced regardless. I may hate what you say, but I defend to the death your right to say it- Voltaire. I believe that with all my heart.
It maybe different "tiers" to you, but I see no difference. I just see people speaking their mind and reporting the truth, or what they believe the truth to be with the given evidence they have at the time. You're just being petty because people like Alex Jones, PJW, Steven Crowder, Dave Cullen, Sargon, Dankula, Tommy Robinson and the like aren't on your "team".
They're the "Bad guys", and "Deserve" to be censored. NO ONE DESERVES to be censored. WORDS ARE NOT VIOLENCE YOU WEAK-MINDED, QUEEF-HUFFING TWAT!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ohhhhh my the mask is off. Hahahaha... so what your saying is that you're fully braindead?
Good to know kiddo 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I’m done talking to you. Anyone who wants censorship of any kind is not all right in my book. Hate speech shouldn’t be a thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Where did I say i want censorship? Pretty easy to argue with a man made of straw, and yes while I shouldn't be a thing, we sadly live in a world where it is a thing.
Stop being an emotional cuck and get back to reality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You said yourself “Alex Jones was the most deserving of Censorship” for Sandy Hook.
And all that PJW, and everyone else right of marx is “spewing useless anti-Sjw BS”
And I’d rather be an “emotional cuck” than a Censorship loving, queef-huffing, milkshake chucking, narcissistic soy-based man-person.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
"And out of all the people, his banning from Youtube was the most justified given the amount of harassment his rhetoric brought to the sandy hook survivors families."
Nice Re-wording their kid, but aint gonna work here. Jones rhetoric and outright lies made his sickafant followers torture those families.
Paul again is a liar, he hates soy yet shills for a supplement which is mainly made of soy. And he also just lies about shit constantly.
Also Bit hard for me to drink milkshakes and chug soy given I don't eat any granulated sugar and little to no soy 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Blame his overzealous following, not the man himself. Despite being overzealous, I wouldn’t censor him, I wouldn’t censor anyone.
Because you should be allowed to offend, make people feel angry, or bad. That falls under Free Speech as much as praise does.
I wouldn’t even censor the asses that harassed me for two years. You should have the right to say what you want.
I really don’t care if Paul is a liar or not, everyone lies. Everyone’s a hypocrite at sometime in their lives, welcome to humanity.
Now take your preaching somewhere else please, I don’t want to talk to you anymore. I cannot be any clearer. Leave me alone.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
He still is the one making the lies which then inspires them. Like a mad preacher changing his congregation up. Is he not to blame for their action after years of preaching to them? Also, youtube a private company, if you like capitalism then you cant complain about them doing this, as it's their right to mange their site... kinda sucks having to defend the system that allows that shit hmmm.
Theres a difference between joe Shmoe lying about his dick size and Paul lying outright about mental health, the environment and other important things. As this effects public discourse and how people view these things. Many people like you screech fake news constantly whilst Paul and his ilk are allowed to get away with it like clockwork.
Fine enough, you just have to stop responding. And if you do respond then you're kinda deflating your point of "Not wanting to talk to me."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
They have become the very thing they proclaim to be against.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0