HOME | DD
mclj10 — Anti-Homophobia Action
Published: 2015-03-01 13:11:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 4603; Favourites: 93; Downloads: 19
Redirect to original
Description
A new take on the old classic logo. It's a bit rushed, and I'll probably update it, but it looks decent enough already. Maybe I'll get it made up on some pin badges or something.Related content
Comments: 162
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 5 ⏩: 0
👍: 5 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 5 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 6 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Leviticus 20:13
13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Romans 1:18-32
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 because that, when they knew God, they glorified himnot as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
👍: 5 ⏩: 0
Still a bit annoyed by the low quality of it, which I haven't been able to solve, but thanks anyway
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i love it but as look through the comment there a lot of people shove their religion into other people faces
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks. Indeed there are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Homo-lobby against traditional family
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
What does the ability of LBGT persons not to be brutalized by society on a daily basis take away from families?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
I don't think promoting sodomy is a good step, not to mention that it is dehonesting real marriage, why wasn't civil partnership enough for you muricans?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Indeed, In Holland they were all gay friendly and immediately "Dutch Pedophile Political Party Wants Legal Sex Age Of 12"
Whenever people become too lazy selfish and decadent a drastic change will happen, since people always moan for change when there's too much of something.
"Despite this being a global thing people kinda have that tendency for liberty, justice and non-discrimination nowadays..."
Actually you are mistaken here, from global perspective I can see otherwise,
Whenever "west" become more liberal non-discrimination and decedent the first will become more conservative like in Russia Russia's Anti-Gay Law or rise of fundamentalism in Middle east like Isis and so on. It is lie yin and yang.
Same with individualism in west and collectivism in east.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
How about let people be and stop letting a two gay people getting married bother you. They probably don't even know you nor should you acknowledge them so grow up and stop having a victim complex.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
It about being a part of society...
Every incorporated society have a set of rules. The rules set out how the society is run. We are all affecting each other when living and working together in Society. So, use brain before commenting.
The homos are part of society, as long as they are not living in som jungle and are self sufficient, in that case I have no problem with them, since they are not capable to multiply anyway.
Well, it is not my role to lecture uneducated kids, but, stop playing games and eating chips read some books (that are not homo-lobby propaganda)
Audi alteram partem "listen to the other side" Good luck
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What if society is accepting of gay people? If not, society can change overtime.
You're the one who is trying to bring up a point, so why are you telling me to "edyumah-cate mahself!1!"
You tell me to read books that are not "homo-lobby propaganda", so are you implying that I to listen to your anti-gay propaganda? In that case, hell no. It's my opinion. If I want to gay people to have the same rights as every other person than I will. Their rights shouldn't end where your feelings begin and vice-versa. And why yes I would read up on some "homo-lobby propaganda" rather than be a close-minded conservatard.
And no I will not "listen to the other side" Your opinion isn't better than mine or a fact.
Not to mention that you don't have any credibility since you think that gays should be fixed (conversion therapy doesn't work) and the fact that you refer to gay people as "homos", as if they are less than human. So please take your homophobic bullshit elsewhere, I'm done here and I can't see this argument going anywhere.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Umm, you do realise that you are the one replying on my comment?
So take your homo-lobby propaganda bullshit elsewhere, I'm done here and I can't see this argument going anywhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The prevention of daily brutalization and bullying of LBGT persons is not "promoting sodomy". Allowing to consenting people who are in love to marry, in no way takes away anything from any other marriage. If anything is taking away from marriage it's 5 minute celebrity marriages, but no one constantly attacks and brutalizes celebrities for ruining what marriage stands for. And civil partnership is clearly not enough, as it is not legally equal to marriage, and couples in civil partnerships do not receive equal treatment by law. In nations such as Cuba where couples in civil partnerships, and married couples are treated equally by law, it doesn't really matter. And as the US Supreme Court mentioned, it is against the US Constitution to not allow gay marriage, so clearly it is not enough for Americans. And no, I'm not American.
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
I disagree. Like I said, traditional family is the thing that should be embraced if we want healthy society not this sick homo lobby agenda.
Still i think state should provide treatment for this people just to be sure it can't be fixed, i think it can be fixed, but not in society like this where profit, consume selfish individualism are dominant aspect no wonder suicide rate and use of drugs are rising.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Have you got any evidence to back up your statement? Do you have any evidence at all to suggest that stopping people from being treated worse than animals is going to "destroy the traditional family"?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
"topping people from being treated worse than animals "
You Liberal fanatics must be outta your mind! pure nonsense...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Says the person with no evidence to support what they are saying, and is spouting bullshit that would be more suited to the early 20th Century than the early 21st.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Why should I be coerced into believing and accepting something which I believe to be immoral? It just shows that leftism is the most totalitarian ideology in history.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why should you have the right to conduct a physical and psychological war against people who are homosexuals? You can disagree with it, fine, but you have no right to put any member of the LGBT community through intense bullying both physical and psychological, as so many do.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Then do you have any right to shut down a person's business or force them to do something that opposes their religious beliefs?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If those religious belief's infringe on the rights of others.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Who gets to decide that? And what is a right? Why is a person entitled to certain freedoms? From where do these rights originate? If they come from God, then behavior which acts against God's will would not be a right, and if they come from man himself, well man is flawed. I consider myself a Burkian conservative, I believe that Burke's concept of liberty, as inherently tied to tradition and morality holds true. As he said "Liberty does not exist in the absence of morality". Burke predicted, accurately that the French Revolution would not bring about liberty but instead tyranny, largely because of their destruction of morals and traditions. This logic is applicable to today. As I myself believe, liberty, when not protected and constrained by morality and tradition, ceases to be liberty and instead becomes tyrannical immorality. The case of Christian small businesses being harrassed and threatened by the LGBT community is proof of this. As people like you already believe, it shoudl become illegal, well it likely will become illegal for a person to say homosexuality is wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basically, God decides what Freedom is is what you are saying, and are then saying that any Rights a person comes up with don't count as "man is flawed". Right.
Lol, the cases of that happening are extremely rare, and in many places completely non-existent. On the other hand harassment of members of the LGBT community is an almost daily occurrence in a large proportion of the world. Try again. When you prove that heterosexuals are constantly oppressed and harassed by members of the LGBT community, then maybe you have an argument. And as a Heterosexual male, I don't feel that oppressed.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
No, I'm saying the founding fathers declaring that rights come from God is nonsense. As is the concept that we are entitled to rights. Why? Why are you or I entitled to a right? I take the view that "rights" are things defended and fought for and passed generation to generation in the form of tradition. You cna say we are entitled to freedom of speech, religion, etc. but a load of good that does when Uncle sam says national security for the satanic American Empire is more important than individual freedom. Or when anything opposing Leftwing thought is banned because its considered hate speech. As you can see, I am not too fond of the US, nor Communism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cool logo!
also friendly reminder for peeps that even from a biblical perspective the bible is pro-gay on several occasions
www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org…
www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org…
www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org…
so that theological argument isn't really valid tbh
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
For the sake of playing Devil's advocate:
The first source is taking a major stretch in the interpretation of a Biblical passage. Secondly, if it was meant to mean that it never would have made it into the Bible, as Mark's Gospel was transcribed from Saint Peter's words, and I can quite guarantee that a Jew (who were essentially part of the ancient Right-wing) would have said such a thing.
This source is also remiss in its defense of the the practice of prepubescent sex slavery. The Jews abhorred this practice, and many scholars maintain it is why St. Paul so deeply railed against sodomy in his letters.
The second source is not by any measure a support of gay marriage, as Our Lord was still saying they shouldn't be married, so it would go with out saying that they shouldn't engage in sexual congress.
Eunuchs were men who had no genitals. Not gay men. Homosexuality was tolerated, but so long as is was not publicly and socially flaunted. Most upper class Roman men partook in gay sex, but if a man was publicly known to be the receiver (I have absolutely no knowledge of gay slang and would prefer it remain that way) he would be openly and constantly belittled (this was an accusation that Julius Caesar was faced with and was part of why his political career never really took off until he took power). Salves would be the only men openly known to gay, but more often than not they would primarily be used for their master's pleasure.
The passage is, overall, in regards to the Acts general message of Our Lord's Message being to all nations, not just the Jews.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thanks. The logo itsef is just a modification of the Antifaschistische Aktion logo. And Interesting links, I'll feature the comment for them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So you're saying you're against homophobia yet you glorify one of the most homophobic nations of the world?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Which is the most homophobic nation in the world, and how do I glorify it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>