HOME | DD
mclj10 — Anti-Homophobia Action
Published: 2015-03-01 13:11:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 4603; Favourites: 93; Downloads: 19
Redirect to original
Description
A new take on the old classic logo. It's a bit rushed, and I'll probably update it, but it looks decent enough already. Maybe I'll get it made up on some pin badges or something.Related content
Comments: 162
He's probably referring to Russia.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I'd like to thank everyone who has favourited this piece, as it has now become my most favourited piece. May we continue the march towards equality for all, and fight against those that lead the repression of homosexuals.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Good old days in communism... When fags and traitors of socialism were locked in mental hospitals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
When revisionism took hold, leading to the eventual downfall of the USSR, and the entire Eastern Bloc....
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
No, I don't think that's was the reason, communism was just not adaptable enough, people wanted something new, Communism provide basic needs, but people saw western propaganda and believed that they live much better, and they wanted that too, that's why so many people are not disappointed with result. There was never such big gap between the wealthy and the poor...
But how is that related to Homosexsuals?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, people were perfectly happy under the Soviet System, until Khrushchev began his revisionism after the death of Stalin. They only reason Stalin re-criminalized homosexuality (after Lenin legalized it) was to get support from the church, which had considerable pull over the people at the time.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
What does "perfectly happy" means? LOL
Again you are wrong, it was because of society. In socialism things like “greedy,” “too self-absorbed,” “violent,” “too ambitious” and racists, homosexsuals, pedhopils (and other sexsual devitions) are not beneficial for society, therefore, are repressed portrayed as unwanted, while healthy and educated society was promoted. Also, disabled people were taken care for, but, were rarely seen in public, since propaganda was telling that all disabilities and disease are only problem of west.
Also don't forget about Tax on childlessness .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
homophobes are gross
homosexuality exists in animals, and WOW GUESS WHAT HUMANS ARE
WE'RE ANIMALS TOO
homophobia is only in one species because humans are idiots
I hate when people are like "homosexuality isn't natural" but they're sitting there typing that on their laptops and phones
like don't fucking talk about UNNATURAL when technology is actually UNNATURAL
also I hate that it's called "homophobia" it isn't a phobia, they aren't scared. They beat up and kill us! It's as bad as racism and sexism.
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
It's cool, but most people posting on here are trolls 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sadly these people are quite serious, internet `Communism` attracts a lot of strange and vile nutters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes they do seem to be, I could give less of a shit about hateful and vile people to be honest, they just aren't worth my time or thoughts, it's better to just hide the comments and think no more of it, rather than fuel their hate and need for attention, as well as making yourself feel like crap, but that's just my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm afraid it doesn't quite work like that, in my experience ignoring them merely leaves their views intact and shored up. The commentators in this thread are perfect examples, they hold views that are at best contradictory and invest a lot of time effort and passion into these views. Its clear no one has taken the time to point out to them how stupid and contradictory their attitudes are. But that's the pleasure of the internet, allowing people to identify with things they know nothing about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'd be very naive to think it works that way, but until I feel like giving a shit about bad people I'll ignore their sorry existance, that doesn't mean I think I am doing something good, ignoring a problem never really makes it fade away, I know that full well, but another thing about the internet is, you can shut it down, log off, or say fuck it and walk away, do something with the people around you, who you know aren't sad idiots and haters who have nothing better to do than make other people feel like shit xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I can't give " fav" for that... sorry...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well this has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons. I like it and it's certainly doing a good job exposing the nutters, though the letter placement seems a bit wonky some are too close together while others are too far apart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's just the way the tool I used to put the letters on worked. It's a bit off, I can't really change it. It was very difficult to wrap it around the circle in the first place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No, this shit, if it's like the official antfa, I'm dead because I hold religious beliefs that comndem gay acts, so I'm a goner and I would not support this group if it existed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I'm curious, do you support the official Antifa position?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Let me guess, Biblical Literalist?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hoperemains.m.webs.com/
www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org…
gaychristian101.com
Read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ok, just ignore my question then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay heres your anwser, i=the bible is a combination, there literal things in there and spiritual. like the verses saying being a homo is a sin, thats literal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So you just pick and chose what in the Bible is literal. And you picked Genesis from that? And are you familiar with the verses saying "being a homo is a sin"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Atheistic Western Minds can't understand an eastern book.
Can't EXPLAIN Jack to closed minded western ideals.
Romans 1: 26 -27
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Hebrews 1:8-9
"But unto the Son he saith,
Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever:
a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity;
therefore God, even thy God,
hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows."
Leviticus 18:22
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
Psalm 5:4-5
"For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness:
neither shall evil dwell with thee.
The foolish shall not stand in thy sight:
thou hatest all workers of iniquity."
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You know, English really fucks up verses a lot.
You know when the bible says we should fear him? Yeah, wrong translation.
Edit: the bible was made by men and women who were homophobes - also, they often saw fertility as a gift or blessing. Gay people can't have babies? Out of the question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
First of all, I laugh at the fact you are calling me closed minded. And at the fact you think I'm Atheist for that matter.
Second, only Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1: 26 -27 are actually evidence for it, as the rest just say God doesn't like people who do bad things.
Third, Leviticus was written long, long before the birth of Jesus, and is essentially a Jewish book.
Fourth, Leviticus 18:22 could easily be interpreted as saying not to have an affair with a man or a woman.
Fifth, "the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly" is also open to interpretation. The definition of "natural use of the woman" isn't specified. Lust can also mean other things. and what is "unseemly" is also not specified. It could well mean that you shouldn't go out drinking with male friends and leave you wife at home alone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your taking things out of context, View your context again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How do you know. Did you personally ask the respective persons who wrote those extracts what they meant? Did you ask God and get a response? Because I doubt you did. Until you do one of those things my explanation is as good as yours, if not more valid, as Jesus often promoted the idea of tolerance and respect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Holy Crap, take it up with God, I didn't write the book, and the point was to say that anti Homophobe action is abdicating violence against people who don't support the LGBT movement as well as religions such as Christianity, Islam and others, and for the sake of God, stop Judging all Bible Believers (Fundies) based on the actions of the few.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will advocate violence against people who drive a massive proportion of homosexuals to suicide. When people receive massive discrimination due to their sexual orientation, in which people engage in a psychological war on homosexuals, and in cases in a physical one, people should meet violence with violence. When 30% of Homosexual youth in the US attempt suicide at 15, and more than half of the homosexual community in the US say they have attempted suicide on more than one occasion, nearly always due to extreme bullying and discrimination (90% of homosexuals have reported bullying at school due to their sexual orientation, of which half said they were physically harassed, and a quarter said they were physically assaulted), is it not right to meet the violence with violence? I will judge the acts of US Bible believers ("Southern Jesus" followers) based on the actions of the many. It is a disgrace to God.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You're arguing with a self described National `Communist` awareness and consistency aren't exactly there strongest points.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not all Muslims are terrorists, Not all bible believers are evil Beings, As a bible believer, We have being oppressed for centuries, by the Romans, The Catholics, Other "christian" denominations, Muslims, and others.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have no idea what oppression is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh really, Look at all the Christians the Catholics Persecuted and killed in the Middle ages, That's Oppression.
Look at how the Saudis Oppress Women.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Heres your Anwser: exaltgod.deviantart.com/art/Li…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So. You're an idiot, as well as a revisionist. Good to know. And may I add:
"Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven."
Mathew 6:1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*logic* Anyone who disagrees with me is a revisionist and is bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, you call yourself a "national communist" hence you are a revisionist. And yes it is bad because nationalism isn't internationalism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*logic* Revisionists are evil, Stalin killed no man.
This Devation and its supporters are one of the reasons why I'm pro gun, in case A bunch of emo clowns try to attack me because ofr my beliefs about homos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Revisionism is bad, it destroyed every single nation that went down the revisionist route.
Why the hell shouldn't they? When "Bible Believers" and other groups track down homosexuals, assault them physically verbal, marginalize them from society, force them to suicide, or out right kill them themselves, why the hell shouldn't they act with violence? I would react with violence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, we bible believers are peaceful people, we spread the gospel far and why, we don't wish harm on anyone, only the abc which is guilty of blasphemy bullies gays, if you act in violence againsty brothers in Christ or me, I have the right to protect them and myself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
okay, I'll got this myself.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>