HOME | DD
MCMXC2 — Reality Test
Published: 2011-11-07 13:54:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 6213; Favourites: 69; Downloads: 48
Redirect to original
Description
Another test with the Reality Plugin. This time I tried to reduce the quality settings to speed up the rendering.Well... still taking over 8 hours for the rendering:/
But at least now it does not suck up all my RAM...
Lastroute character created by
Related content
Comments: 171
Thank you so much
And thanks for the fav
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks
Well, I have some 3D trees...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
where did u get them? did u made them? or did u download them? cause everytime i try to download some 3D models it onlt appear a like 5 pictures of leafs and some of ood <.<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Were in some models...
But they suggested me to try this! [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
but how do u download them? this extracting them and they will appear on my 3D max? or how?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
...oh, you're right, they are simple 2D pictures
I found some free tree here [link]
Look if there's something you like, and then I will try to convert it for you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thank you, i dowmloaded it, but when i want to open it, the 3d max says "error" and it doesnt open D: do u know why?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
a flower, i will serach for it, now im doing hw, tomorrow i can give u the link so u can check it out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
8hour? i never see 8h for just one picture. it's very strange as if your pc is not very good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LuxRender uses a massive calculation of Indirect Lighting, more heavy than the one used in a Radiosity algorithm, and a "real" simulation of materials, with no "tricks" or simplifications used in 3D programs. CPU rendering is not good for this, unless you have a "render farm". That's why I'm looking forward for the GPU accelerated version:/
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Maybe I'm just too slow, but eight hours is impressive. This could be considered great work no matter how long it took though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you so much
Faster results will be achieved when the GPU Accelerated version will be available
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Grazie
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Consultando sia i forum di LuxRender che di Reality, PARE che per l'accelerazione GPU se ne parlera' entro la fine dell'anno. Si tratta di riuscire ad integrare il codice di SmallLuxGPU all'interno di LuxRender...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Incrocio l'incrociabile!>_______________< SLG e' velocissimo persino sulle GPU ATI serie 48xx, serie che per ammissione della stessa ATI e' molto scarsa nell'OpenCL... figurarsi quindi come potrebbe andare sulla mia 6950!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
8 hours for rendering? Wow... you can do lots of things while waiting for your model to be rendered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't really understand about 3D rendering technologies But I hope the same for you, too, Mario...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Modern graphic cards are not good just to play games: they can be used for very fast calculations too. A specific programming language, called "OpenCL", was made for this (And Nvidia graphic cards have a faster version too, called "CUDA"). The creators of the powerful but slow render engine LuxRender have created for testing a small OpenCL version of it, called "SmallLuxGPU"(SLG), and it is DAMN FAST! For example, the benchmarks showed that where LuxRender does 320 calculations every second, SLG can do over 9660 calculations!!! So, we are waiting for the programmers to include the code of SLG in LuxRender...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wait... wait... Your explanation is too much for a total noob like me. I don't understand a thing about programming or computations. I'm gonna need assistance from my lil' bro about this...
Although I get the point that the new programming for GPU is expected to be faster, rite?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow!! Thats so coooooooool! The girl is pretty and hot too!!
Good job!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your Welcome!!
Keep it up and the good work!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
May I ask if she can be in a video? It's alright if not. Just asking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, of course
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>