HOME | DD

Mgx0 β€” Rules of the Internet

#gardevoir #pokemon #swampert
Published: 2015-11-02 09:37:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 200498; Favourites: 2572; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

Sorry Gardevoir, it’s the rule of the internet. But luckily, Swampert is there to look after you : 3

note: Yes, I purposely search those images for the sake of this comic.

Related content
Comments: 406

GaryOak127 In reply to ??? [2016-08-19 03:38:15 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... no?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkFishking In reply to GaryOak127 [2016-08-19 03:59:58 +0000 UTC]

Rule 34: If it exists, fictional or realistically, there is pornographical content of it, ALWAYS.

Rule 35: If Rule 34 is false and there is no pornographical content of it, it will be made in the future, with a 100% chance.

Rule 41: Anything is someones fetish, to be understood literally.

I hope i explained my point in the other comment and now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GaryOak127 In reply to DarkFishking [2016-08-19 20:57:45 +0000 UTC]

Oh. Thank you?
Damn, the human race is ****ed up!? 😨

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WTK55 In reply to GaryOak127 [2016-08-20 17:14:02 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GaryOak127 In reply to WTK55 [2016-08-20 17:32:35 +0000 UTC]

Excuse me? I'm very grown. I honestly don't know why I'm surprised.
But that's no excuse to say something rude.
I think that you should know that words hurt, and you making fun of my reaction of how, uh... awkward it is to draw porn of something that's fake. I think that's a little immature. I think people are screwed. That's that. I think that it's pretty stupid to draw porn of unexisting creatures. And I give a sh*t. My childhood ruined. Not to mention thousands of other people who look up Gardevior move sets and find a stupid, disturbing picture of a human ****ing a PokΓ©mon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hunterh1998 In reply to ??? [2016-08-15 07:40:17 +0000 UTC]

The real question we should be asking is, why was she searching herself up with no filt
er?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

Trazeguy In reply to Hunterh1998 [2016-10-20 01:35:50 +0000 UTC]

Maybe her trainer left this on the screen and she just happened to walk by.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkFishking In reply to Hunterh1998 [2016-08-19 03:01:05 +0000 UTC]

Especially fetish-artists see no need to put an matue content tag on their work.
I am not against Rule34, i love it actually, i do not care for Rule41, i just ignore it.
But especially most people who fall into Rule41 are the biggest dipshits ever.
Just because that this is a character of a an anime or video game franchise ok to watch/play for children does not mean their fetish-artwork falls under that too.
It is disgusting.
Another thing is, either i have not understood fetishes like vore but i never ever saw a good drawing.
The quality always looks shit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheCelesticWarrior In reply to Hunterh1998 [2016-08-16 12:55:09 +0000 UTC]

I googled pictures of Gardevoir just to get some official art of it, with a filter on, and I still couldn't escape the more, eh, questionable results.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TrixieLulamoon17 In reply to ??? [2016-08-12 17:35:22 +0000 UTC]

IM SO SORRY GARDEVOIR! IM SORRY YOU HAD TO SEE THAT CRAP!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SolarFoofy In reply to ??? [2016-08-12 05:34:00 +0000 UTC]

Is it just me or do I see Squirtle (Mgx0's Mudkip) Faintly on the back of the computer screen? If you zoom in extremely close to it you can see it!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hewdraw In reply to ??? [2016-08-11 12:22:57 +0000 UTC]

But... Gardevoir is a species, not an individual, that's like one of us freaking out over being porn of humans on the internet.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Mgx0 In reply to Hewdraw [2016-08-17 08:01:55 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkFishking In reply to Mgx0 [2016-08-19 03:02:28 +0000 UTC]

It depends on the intensity.
And yes, for minors it should stay by humans first.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SomeGuyWithGlass In reply to Hewdraw [2016-08-12 19:09:16 +0000 UTC]

Agreed, still funny though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pycotichVIPmen In reply to ??? [2016-08-10 20:08:17 +0000 UTC]

All Pokemon are for hug, not fug.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

watervanoss In reply to ??? [2016-08-06 21:57:48 +0000 UTC]

Β :I warned you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Blueironlily In reply to ??? [2016-08-02 10:30:50 +0000 UTC]

god I love these two together SO CUUUTEΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AutobotHoneflash In reply to ??? [2016-07-23 03:18:12 +0000 UTC]

What did you search?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AK12346 In reply to AutobotHoneflash [2016-07-26 14:31:55 +0000 UTC]

Googled her own name without the safesearch function active, it seems.
I'm just she doesn't use Bing or not even all the comforting Swampert cuddles in the world wouldn't be able to help her.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Strokend In reply to AK12346 [2016-08-10 17:00:03 +0000 UTC]

URL specifically says "Porndex," which I'm assuming is a compilation of R18+ pokemon images.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AutobotHoneflash In reply to AK12346 [2016-08-05 23:04:13 +0000 UTC]

Wha?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AK12346 In reply to AutobotHoneflash [2016-08-06 01:50:29 +0000 UTC]

Don't search Gardevoir on Bing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SirArceon In reply to AK12346 [2016-08-10 15:52:26 +0000 UTC]

Don't search ANYTHING on Bing.

EVER.

Β  Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OneSicklyGuy In reply to ??? [2016-07-17 06:34:00 +0000 UTC]

More like RULES OF NATURE!!!!!!1

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ace66062 In reply to ??? [2016-07-15 10:30:06 +0000 UTC]

R.I.P Internet, R.I.P Gardevoir.

*reads description*

R.I.P your browsing history

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChubbPanda In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 21:14:32 +0000 UTC]

You are so brave

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SketchCrows In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 15:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Cuteness overload! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NaroShinozaki In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 10:17:45 +0000 UTC]

naww

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RoboPika20 In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 05:07:25 +0000 UTC]

Ohmigravy, 4th panel! I'm laughing so hardΒ Β 
This is fantasticΒ Β  Great work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

medoblitz In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 04:01:13 +0000 UTC]

wow this is awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MeerArtist In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 00:44:37 +0000 UTC]

B'aww~ So sweet~ the comforting thing, I mean

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Belpherith In reply to ??? [2016-07-12 00:41:13 +0000 UTC]

>rules of the internet
Rules r made to be broken dude. There is a lot of things in this world and r34 can't dominate all of them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkFishking In reply to Belpherith [2016-08-19 03:04:43 +0000 UTC]

Well then, you clearly have not understood the definiton of Rule34.
The rule clearly states that if it exists, fiction or not, there is pornographic content of it, no matter what.
Rule35 says that if there is no porn of something, it will be made.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

intel-4004 In reply to DarkFishking [2016-08-24 06:45:00 +0000 UTC]

Now that this statement came up ("Rules are made to be broken"), I think the term should change to "Fact 34". Rule 34 is stating a fact, not really something that happens because someone follows the rules of it. Anyways, this is just my thoughts (interesting?).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkFishking In reply to intel-4004 [2016-08-24 10:03:20 +0000 UTC]

Not really, because it does not matter.
Rule or Fact 34 will apply, no matter which term we use to describe it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

intel-4004 In reply to DarkFishking [2016-09-01 01:58:06 +0000 UTC]

I mean if I were to be picky about the use of word "Rule" or "Fact", then the word "fact" is more suiting to the meaning.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

awesomecraft124 In reply to ??? [2016-07-10 16:22:46 +0000 UTC]

and I thought googling yourself meant the other thing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wert1341 In reply to ??? [2016-06-30 20:21:44 +0000 UTC]

It seems no one told poor Gardi that searching her own name on the internet is a bad idea.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrAdvisor In reply to ??? [2016-06-30 15:30:04 +0000 UTC]

This gave me an idea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GENESISKUN In reply to ??? [2016-06-30 14:11:41 +0000 UTC]

Poor Gardevoir Β 
Swampert looks like a great brother figure in my opinion ahaha

Jokes aside, I really like your art style. Its really cute

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Battledroidunit047 In reply to ??? [2016-06-30 00:26:17 +0000 UTC]

There outta be a law against it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pixle-dust In reply to Battledroidunit047 [2016-06-30 02:51:58 +0000 UTC]

Β  Β Well that's the last straw Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Battledroidunit047 In reply to Pixle-dust [2016-06-30 03:17:41 +0000 UTC]

I was being serious. no pun intended! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cynthrey In reply to ??? [2016-06-29 02:39:28 +0000 UTC]

r34?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChromArtChill In reply to Cynthrey [2016-06-30 04:33:56 +0000 UTC]

Its one of the MANY official rules of the internet, it says that if theres anything on the internet there has to be porn of it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SirArceon In reply to ChromArtChill [2016-07-29 22:53:18 +0000 UTC]

Worst. Β Rule. Β Ever.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

DarkFishking In reply to SirArceon [2016-08-19 03:05:53 +0000 UTC]

Not entirely, some artists just think they are in no need to tag their work as mature.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChromArtChill In reply to SirArceon [2016-07-29 23:58:10 +0000 UTC]

Oh well = 3 =

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Miguel-Neves In reply to ??? [2016-06-29 01:33:05 +0000 UTC]

Its the life... ;-;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>