HOME | DD

mheuf — Homosexuality

Published: 2009-10-10 11:06:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 1730; Favourites: 95; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description # - "Homosexuality"



HOLGA CFN "Panda"
Kodak Portra 160 VC
Double exposure
Negative scanned

Related deviation :


Parallel stories :


Featured by :
*privatedanser [link]
*felibree [link]
*aL-baum [link]
=pentangled [link]
Related content
Comments: 49

Vlad-Off-kru [2012-12-14 02:16:24 +0000 UTC]

Exce!!enT

please liked, my page [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sth22art [2012-03-25 11:32:21 +0000 UTC]

great work
...and the title makes me think!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

penngregory [2010-02-14 00:02:27 +0000 UTC]

featured here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Al-Baum [2010-01-14 11:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Featuré
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

privatedanser [2010-01-10 10:11:41 +0000 UTC]

news feature [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

felibree [2010-01-01 21:25:21 +0000 UTC]

Featured [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Amyna [2009-12-12 22:53:44 +0000 UTC]

great title

and great idea

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pho4me [2009-11-15 14:30:37 +0000 UTC]

great concept, such a hoot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to pho4me [2009-12-06 23:32:52 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eckenheimer [2009-10-24 16:04:01 +0000 UTC]

excellent

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to Eckenheimer [2009-10-28 01:04:33 +0000 UTC]

merci

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

En-GeL [2009-10-24 10:00:55 +0000 UTC]

Superbe !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to En-GeL [2009-10-28 01:04:22 +0000 UTC]

merci Hugo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

isoldh [2009-10-19 11:58:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie [2009-10-13 12:48:22 +0000 UTC]

Hermaphrodisme.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

felibree [2009-10-12 14:42:04 +0000 UTC]

Une de mes préférées par toutes tes photos ! Très fort, les lignes sont parfaites. Rien à redire, juste observer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to felibree [2009-10-14 19:41:22 +0000 UTC]

merci, content qu'elle te plaise.
A Bordeaux tu trouveras sûrement un bon terrain de jeu
pour t'essayer à des doubles-expos de ce type

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

felibree In reply to mheuf [2009-10-14 19:56:50 +0000 UTC]

j'ai essayé quelques "trucs", on verra , les batiments n'ont pas vraiment cette forme abrupte (ils sortent des années 70, plein de vagues...).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to felibree [2009-10-14 20:07:00 +0000 UTC]

à l'occasion viens sur Toulouse,
et moi sur Bordeaux

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

felibree In reply to mheuf [2009-10-14 20:18:47 +0000 UTC]

sans problème
Mon frère vit sur Toulouse, donc à l'occasion... je te mettrais une note le jour où je descends à la ville rose
(et n'hésite pas si tu veux venir bdx, tu est le bienvenu !)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lostknightkg [2009-10-11 14:12:29 +0000 UTC]

c'est superbe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to lostknightkg [2009-10-11 19:52:05 +0000 UTC]

merci

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lostknightkg In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 20:04:04 +0000 UTC]

De rien , vous etes featured aussi dans mon journal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to lostknightkg [2009-10-11 20:27:51 +0000 UTC]

encore merci!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lostknightkg In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 20:35:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

geschmacksneutral [2009-10-10 23:35:23 +0000 UTC]

Great perspective!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

privatedanser [2009-10-10 18:08:08 +0000 UTC]

Bravo Nathan !

superbe concept et realisation, comme d'habitude !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to privatedanser [2009-10-11 14:04:24 +0000 UTC]

merci beaucoup!
Je ne pense pas que bcp de monde ait compris le concept,
mais ça laisse du mystère comme ça

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

privatedanser In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 15:27:46 +0000 UTC]

ah , pour moi c'est evident , surtout quand on a vu la premiere!

mais le mystere ,c'est bien ... a ce qu'on dit (je n'ai jamais pu l'appliquer ,cette theorie )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LEQUARK [2009-10-10 17:44:37 +0000 UTC]

somptueux....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to LEQUARK [2009-10-11 14:04:54 +0000 UTC]

merci petit invader de l'espace

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LEQUARK In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 17:43:32 +0000 UTC]



👍: 0 ⏩: 0

as2pik [2009-10-10 17:07:20 +0000 UTC]

c'est ta participation au championnat du monde de rubik's cube de ce week-end ?
renversant !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to as2pik [2009-10-11 14:11:21 +0000 UTC]

Ah ouais? je ne savais pas que les champions de rubik's cube étaient homos!
Je le résous en 3min, j'ai peut-être ma chance...

Merci en tout cas

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

as2pik In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 15:15:52 +0000 UTC]

ça je sais pas je parlais plus en référence au format et forme qu'au titre

par contre 3min c'est trop long le record est de 7,08 sec

ah et je me suis permis de la mettre dans mon journal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to as2pik [2009-10-11 19:48:43 +0000 UTC]

J'ai même vu des gars étant plus rapides que moi avec les yeux bandés
encore merci

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Piarvi-Recherreen [2009-10-10 15:11:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to Piarvi-Recherreen [2009-10-11 14:12:36 +0000 UTC]

merci Pierre-Henri

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tom-Ripley [2009-10-10 13:37:36 +0000 UTC]

belle construction...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to Tom-Ripley [2009-10-11 14:14:38 +0000 UTC]

Rhâ les quartiers d'affaires, ça inspire toujours un peu pour la composition de l'image
Merci à toi Tom.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

navidsanati [2009-10-10 12:12:23 +0000 UTC]

i love everything in this photo,emm but i didnt understand why u name this homosecuality

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to navidsanati [2009-10-11 19:57:17 +0000 UTC]

Maybe I'm too pervert

It is related to "In utero" [link] , so here it's about female sexuality...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

navidsanati In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 20:00:26 +0000 UTC]

emmmmm but maybe i'm too stupid cuz i couldnt find female sexuality on the link too can u explain it more?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to navidsanati [2009-10-11 20:22:11 +0000 UTC]

euh.... ok
"In utero" looks like an uterus --> [link]
so two female reproductive organs very close...
make me think that there's a sexual relationship between two women

My purpose is to give a new vision of the architectural photography

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

navidsanati In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 20:25:43 +0000 UTC]

the link gave a lot of help
i admire ur purpose

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to navidsanati [2009-10-11 20:31:04 +0000 UTC]

merci!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aobaob [2009-10-10 11:14:42 +0000 UTC]

All bent.
I have no idea how you do these, but you do them well!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mheuf In reply to aobaob [2009-10-11 14:20:24 +0000 UTC]

It is a double exposure with a analog camera... (a piece of film is exposed twice, to two different images.
The resulting photographic image shows the second image superimposed over the first).

I use a Toy (cheap) camera named "Holga" to make that

Thanks a lot Alex

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aobaob In reply to mheuf [2009-10-11 20:42:29 +0000 UTC]

Ah, genius work, very clever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0