HOME | DD

Published: 2016-09-21 08:57:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 21312; Favourites: 332; Downloads: 950
Redirect to original
Description
Daz Studio 4.9 I-ray HDRIRelated content
Comments: 10
MikeeJ [2018-06-15 19:07:04 +0000 UTC]
Somebody help me out here. I can't figure out where the traffic to this is coming from. The render isn't even very good, I get that lots of folks like her looks, but there's several better pictures of her in my gallery that have hundreds of hits and this has thousands???? If you came to this from a link then please tell me what it is????
By the way this isn't a rant or a complaint I'm just confused.....
π: 0 β©: 0
Xnorg [2017-09-14 12:03:18 +0000 UTC]
Oh no, no need any breakfast but I think I`d love to have some quicky!..
π: 0 β©: 0
MikeeJ In reply to Cosmics-3D-Angels [2016-09-21 16:04:20 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, gotta admit I think she looks quite hot too
π: 0 β©: 1
Cosmics-3D-Angels In reply to MikeeJ [2016-09-21 16:18:23 +0000 UTC]
I love that character and would like to see her in a very hot erotic picture set ... if you do this, I would like to upload your complete set at my blog with link to your gallery here.Β At my blog is adult stuff allowed ... Don't know what you think about that. MikeeJ
π: 0 β©: 1
MikeeJ In reply to Cosmics-3D-Angels [2016-09-22 07:53:24 +0000 UTC]
Well, thank you for your kind offer of helping to bring people to view my page.
However, I don't want to go further than softcore images - very hot and erotic is not my thing.
I already have too many pictures that use the "boobs out =cheap win" tactic when I should be focusing more on gesture, expression, outfit, environment and especially improving my crappy lighting skills.
I don't mean that I won't do anymore topless pictures, just that I'm already past the point where I should do something different - there is far too much repetition in my gallery. I keep trying to hide it by deleting some of my older stuff, but then I just put the same stlyes back only newer.... meh.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Cosmics-3D-Angels In reply to MikeeJ [2016-09-22 14:29:55 +0000 UTC]
That's very sorry ... but I understand
π: 0 β©: 0