HOME | DD

MikeGamble β€” SHEDDING

Published: 2014-06-02 03:29:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 20978; Favourites: 856; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Woodcut/Oil on Paper
23x60

2014
Related content
Comments: 134

toasterofjustice [2014-09-03 20:45:10 +0000 UTC]

Woah this is traditional! Thought it was digital, it's so clean and well executed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikeGamble In reply to toasterofjustice [2014-09-04 23:50:22 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

toasterofjustice In reply to MikeGamble [2014-09-05 06:15:37 +0000 UTC]

No problem!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtbyBones [2014-09-03 19:47:33 +0000 UTC]

Very cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikeGamble In reply to ArtbyBones [2014-09-04 23:50:33 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

randomshitstuff [2014-09-03 19:36:13 +0000 UTC]

I dont exactly understand how woodcutting works, but even then I sure can appreciate the greatness of the picture, I love it, I've often had visualizations of these kinds of scenes in my head, with people pulling their skin off, or tearing it apart, but I was never able to actually draw or paint them, but you managed to do that perfectly!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikeGamble In reply to randomshitstuff [2014-09-04 23:50:36 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

comgree123 [2014-09-03 18:18:47 +0000 UTC]

Love this, is it supposed to be Jesus?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MikeGamble In reply to comgree123 [2014-09-04 23:51:23 +0000 UTC]

No. Just a self portrait. Just a coincidence that my jeans somewhat resemble what people see as jesus.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AgentDecker [2014-09-03 17:31:20 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Draco-Bellatrix In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 04:01:17 +0000 UTC]

I have just read it,what is it exactly?
May i take a closer look at the picture?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GothicElegance In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 17:51:33 +0000 UTC]

Lock your children in a room, with no computer, no cellphone, no windows, and no door. That way nothing will offend their delicate sensibilities. Or you know...Talk to your kids about mature things? They have to learn some time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to GothicElegance [2014-09-03 19:42:02 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Canderhas In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 01:19:04 +0000 UTC]

When I was young my father didn't bother hiding this stuff from me. Because of that I have a healthy respect for the human body, I'm less squeamish, and I ask more mature questions. I try not to curse because it holds no meaning. Here's the thing, though, by making such things taboo your child will actively seek them out at a later date. If they see it, they might be frightened, but how about explaining that it's just a picture? There is nothing showing, which shouldn't matter to begin with, and has no reason to have a mature filter.

While I can understand you belief's on such a topic, I feel that children are uselessly sheltered from a lot of things and thus are overwhelmed by them later. Especially when they're hit by a wall of hyper-sexualization and things that make them want to fit a stereotype.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to Canderhas [2014-09-04 03:08:37 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

GothicPegasister23 In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 03:24:06 +0000 UTC]

So what. They write stuff. Put on your big boy panties and deal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Canderhas In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 03:15:12 +0000 UTC]

Have a wonderful day.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to Canderhas [2014-09-04 03:33:39 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Canderhas In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 03:39:27 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, don't get the reference. Is that a Bad Dream Princess reference?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bloedzuigerbloed In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 20:22:40 +0000 UTC]

3 year old children would not be browsing deviantART.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to bloedzuigerbloed [2014-09-03 20:39:41 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

bloedzuigerbloed In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 20:48:56 +0000 UTC]

That would be your problem for browsing a site like this with them around, not the artist's for not including a mature tag. The mature filters are to be used only when the artist or dA administrators decide they're necessary, not when someone says they don't like their kids seeing it. If you have a problem with the things on this site, I recommend you find a different one with works more age appropriate for your children's delicate minds.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to bloedzuigerbloed [2014-09-03 20:53:34 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

cinnabunangel In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 06:04:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh dear lord. This is also the internet if you haven't figured that much out. It doesn't follow the same rules. -face palms- if you're worried about your kids wait to look at this site later when, you know they're a sleep. I let my little sister watch me surf this site and she's 4, and I look through scary stuff. And this site is wonderful, it shouldn't change over one dude's complaints over something so petty as this.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

MikeGamble In reply to cinnabunangel [2014-09-04 23:17:54 +0000 UTC]

thank you for defending me. I appreciate it! And for the kind words as well!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnabunangel In reply to MikeGamble [2014-09-05 00:23:36 +0000 UTC]

No problem hun! I love your art, it looks amazing. C:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AgentDecker In reply to cinnabunangel [2014-09-04 08:04:04 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnabunangel In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 08:19:55 +0000 UTC]

Pffft you're funny. There is no way in this whole world you can be a honest adult. Not the way you act. And how's this suppose to be porn, I'm curious? Β It not like he's actually naked. This is one of those pieces where you need to use your brain. That's the organ that's obviously shoveled up in your skull if this is how you act. Also, if you did manage to get the owner fired, you would not be taking his place, do your research before using empty threats.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to cinnabunangel [2014-09-04 08:59:30 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnabunangel In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 15:55:35 +0000 UTC]

You're an amusing troll. I'm going to be honest, I wouldn't guess you to be much older than 16, if that. Your spelling and grammar is horrendous. Also, I pity any child that has to deal with you.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GothicPegasister23 In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 22:49:37 +0000 UTC]

Ok. Leave. Or just, you know, give the pups some toys or a coloring book. This isn't really creepy, or mature, or nightmare fuel.

Also: You don't want your pups to see it yet you go out of your way to comment on the piece, increasing the likelihood of said pups seeing this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

MikeGamble In reply to GothicPegasister23 [2014-09-04 23:18:17 +0000 UTC]

agreed..thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GothicPegasister23 In reply to MikeGamble [2014-09-04 23:39:39 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure kind sir!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

juxtapose3d In reply to GothicPegasister23 [2014-09-04 03:39:51 +0000 UTC]

**shots fired**

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GothicPegasister23 In reply to juxtapose3d [2014-09-04 03:41:09 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AgentDecker In reply to GothicPegasister23 [2014-09-04 02:52:56 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GothicPegasister23 In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 02:57:26 +0000 UTC]



Logic used reasoning!

Honey, I say pups instead of kids, babies, children, ext. Please come up with better retorts love, it's humiliating. For you of course, not me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to GothicPegasister23 [2014-09-04 03:03:20 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GothicPegasister23 In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 03:10:31 +0000 UTC]

Is this the best you can come up with? Well that was terrible. Darling, I'm 13. I'm younger than you no doubt. You're clinging to a sinking ship. And I still haven't lost all my baby teeth. "You a" is terribly improper grammar, please don't say it. Having not havin. Capitalize the first letter of every sentence. Are you trying to say I'm only typing? Because I'm a very talkative person. So that's not true. And you're not offending me, you're entertaining me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ThatAnnoyingRabbit In reply to GothicPegasister23 [2014-09-04 04:57:33 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GothicPegasister23 In reply to ThatAnnoyingRabbit [2014-09-04 13:14:28 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bloedzuigerbloed In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 20:56:38 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps not coming back would be the better option, because the site's going to stay just the way it is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to bloedzuigerbloed [2014-09-03 21:01:58 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

GothicPegasister23 In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 22:51:50 +0000 UTC]

Oh. So you're just a troll. Thanks for explaining. Plus, a site like this is probably worth at least a 5-7 million dollars. If you one the lottery, why no just hire a nanny? Or buy fancy stuff for your pups to play with/use while you're on the internet.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bloedzuigerbloed In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 21:05:52 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, you go ahead and do that...Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tayleaf In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 20:48:22 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful, thought provoking art. It is well done and emotional.
I keep my kids in the room with me too, but honestly, if you don't want them seeing things, just don't look at them.
I don't think this needs a mature filter at all. It doesn't show any genitals, blood or body fluids. If you scroll to something like this with your kids in the room, just scroll away quickly, and maybe bookmark it for later if you really are interested.

It is selfish to think that a 13+ rated site should cater to 3 year old children who shouldn't have access/be able to view it.
That is your job.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to tayleaf [2014-09-03 20:55:09 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

GothicPegasister23 In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-04 03:26:26 +0000 UTC]

Oh! So you'd be fine with a painting of that journalist being beheaded? It's a person AND a current event so it must be perfectly fine!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tayleaf In reply to AgentDecker [2014-09-03 21:13:05 +0000 UTC]

This isn't exactly abstract, and there is no gore, the stuff under the skin looks basically like black-white skin. It is very minor amount of morbid, but that is the point. Its supposed to make you think and feel.
People and world events are 10x darker and more horrible than this, have you looked at the world lately? With so much actual destruction of life and the decline in humanity as a whole, how can you even justify getting upset over something as minor as art...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AgentDecker In reply to tayleaf [2014-09-04 03:10:42 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2


| Next =>