HOME | DD

Published: 2009-04-16 17:57:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 44224; Favourites: 1498; Downloads: 1540
Redirect to original
Description
11X17 on Marvel cover stock in acrylic.Related content
Comments: 157
ZodiacZoner [2023-04-29 19:54:44 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DistortedSmile [2012-08-12 13:10:53 +0000 UTC]
Mentioned in ^Lyricanna 's interview at #ArtHistoryProject ---> [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
esemese [2011-08-24 06:58:52 +0000 UTC]
congratulations on getting a DD, Mike..... you really deserve it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JebTorres [2011-08-24 05:58:23 +0000 UTC]
Amazing! How do you do it? I try and try but my acrylics don't come out as nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
slifertheskydragon [2011-08-24 05:41:46 +0000 UTC]
HOLY FFF THIS WAS ACRYLLIC!?
*CLAPS*
OAO;;;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gokuyert [2011-08-24 05:05:38 +0000 UTC]
extremely well done, in terms of realism. I REALLY wish comics would stop drawing every female to look like a skank though.
Seriously, even as a big graphic novel fan myself, men are drawn all sorts of ways, but women only tend to be drawn as hot pieces of ass.
I mean, they even made female hulk look sexier..........women are more than objects
Still though, fantastic job on this, seriously, I thought it was a photo of a woman at first, with lasers added in in photoshop
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SolomonFaulknerSR388 [2011-08-24 04:49:16 +0000 UTC]
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBS!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Psyartista9 [2011-08-24 03:42:33 +0000 UTC]
Really well done! Brilliant colors; beautiful form; great overall scenic plot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AnimeVenus16 [2011-08-24 03:34:50 +0000 UTC]
I actually thought this was real, like a model posing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ExiledChaos [2011-08-24 03:08:35 +0000 UTC]
This is so cool, and I actually love that you kept the boarder; it's just cool to see the strokes and paint off the page. I know you said this is acrylic, but do I detect some air brushing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForeverZeroDragon [2011-08-24 02:08:06 +0000 UTC]
AMazing!
But how a piece submitted in 2009 could inspire someone for 8 years... 0.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
mikemayhew In reply to ForeverZeroDragon [2011-08-24 05:28:46 +0000 UTC]
the art was from a comic from 2003.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForeverZeroDragon In reply to mikemayhew [2011-08-24 15:21:15 +0000 UTC]
Oh I was thinking something like that ("old comic" xD). Thanks for the answer
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lyricanna In reply to ForeverZeroDragon [2011-08-24 04:51:50 +0000 UTC]
This comic cover was published in 2003
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForeverZeroDragon In reply to Lyricanna [2011-08-24 15:21:34 +0000 UTC]
THank you! Good to know
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Purplecherry5 In reply to ForeverZeroDragon [2011-08-24 03:30:12 +0000 UTC]
That might have been the year they posted it, but not the year made.
I had the same thought when reading that too
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForeverZeroDragon In reply to Purplecherry5 [2011-08-24 15:22:41 +0000 UTC]
haha XD As some people asnwered me, this cover is from a comic of year 2003 xD. Now we both know
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Near-Zero [2011-08-24 02:02:36 +0000 UTC]
Amazing as always. Was that liquid acrylic of soft body?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mikemayhew In reply to Near-Zero [2011-08-24 05:29:32 +0000 UTC]
I guess it was soft body. Switched to water color lately, and can't remember the new names of the Liquitex product line.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Near-Zero In reply to mikemayhew [2011-08-24 16:37:39 +0000 UTC]
I've been thinking about trying that water color acrylic. Would you say its better to work with than gauche?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mikemayhew In reply to Near-Zero [2011-08-24 17:34:39 +0000 UTC]
the paint I was referring to was just watercolor, like Winsor and Newton. Acrylic is a different kind of paint.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Near-Zero In reply to mikemayhew [2011-08-24 17:57:40 +0000 UTC]
Oh sorry. Then extra wow. You make that water color sing! I thought it was acrylic water color.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kid-Umby [2011-08-24 01:59:00 +0000 UTC]
I actually kinda like this, thought I'm inclined to think the lasers would cast more shadows than the one shown. Chances are I'm wrong, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FragmentsofMagic [2011-08-24 01:10:12 +0000 UTC]
what beautiful work! her skin tone is lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gestobando [2011-08-24 00:26:49 +0000 UTC]
Really? This you call gracefull? The only good thing about this piece is the rendering of the skin
👍: 0 ⏩: 5
xCaelNocturne In reply to Gestobando [2011-08-24 02:25:31 +0000 UTC]
Says alot coming from someone who draws naked little girls.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
splee568 In reply to xCaelNocturne [2011-08-24 03:01:59 +0000 UTC]
THE SUPPOURT IS WELL DESERVED!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gestobando In reply to xCaelNocturne [2011-08-24 02:38:39 +0000 UTC]
You say alot for someone who says : "Says alot coming from someone who draws naked little girls."
You should not say things at all
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xCaelNocturne In reply to Gestobando [2011-08-24 02:56:19 +0000 UTC]
And the same goes for you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Quantization In reply to Gestobando [2011-08-24 01:57:20 +0000 UTC]
Oh look, another fag that cries on the Daily Deviations. Two words: "U JELLY?" If your answer was anything other than "YES I AM", you're lying.
The only thing different between you and the other idiots that sit and cry about the daily deviations, is your gallery is filled to the brim with nothing but horrendous examples of crayons, MSPaint, and unchecked pre-teen hormones. Seriously, dude? What's your angle? Do you jack off to the shit you draw, or are you submitting it for other people to jack off to?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gestobando In reply to Quantization [2011-08-24 02:30:14 +0000 UTC]
No , I am not jelly, and that doesnt make actual sense since I expressed my dislike towards the drawing. I really don't care about artist's feeling, I don't wanna hurt people , but sometimes Its fun to piss them of and attract douches trying to defend something they dont have anything to do , like yourself, for example; I dont have any positive criticism to do , I just say why the works sucks. In real life you have an active relation with everything around you, the things you see or hear etc. What you see and hear belongs to your imagination. If I say you should go fuck yourself I dont actually want you to go fuck yourself, Its just a statement on how stupid you are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Quantization In reply to Gestobando [2011-08-24 02:47:30 +0000 UTC]
People like you are my substitute for the television. On the television, I am only given the power to watch immature cunts fuck themselves. Here, I can actively partake in watching you give yourself enough of the proverbial rope.
You should probably brush up on your reading comprehension skills, child. Furthermore, I can see that you've dodged two questions. Allow me to reiterate them for you, since you're finding it very difficult to process them.1) Do you masturbate to the children or child-like figures you create in crayon?
2) If no, are you simply placing them in a public place so others can masturbate to them?The vast majority of your comment is pseudo-intellectual rambling. Please try again in a form of language that individuals who do not speak the language of the mentally challenged can process.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gestobando In reply to Quantization [2011-08-24 03:08:46 +0000 UTC]
Ok , I'll try not to be pseudo intellectual , but thats quite hard since my whole father's family was of homozygous pseudo intellectuals .(oops, there , I did it again)
You made 2 reasonable question and there is no reason for not answering them:
1) No , i dont , I masturbate to bestiality and fart porn like normal people
2) I dont mind people masturbating to them, but I really dont see a reason for that since there is no bestiality or people farting on each other on them.
Since I really dont remember what were you complaining about , I dont really know what to say, but I think its pretty safe to say :go fuck yourself, you sissy. Stop complaining about stuff, whatever they are, It wasn't even your work . Dont you have things to do better than questioning if you are allowed to fap to drawings of little girls?? I dont know man , ask a priest , a psychanalyst or just do It anyway .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>