HOME | DD

Published: 2013-09-23 21:55:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 7098; Favourites: 146; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Nikovic-87 'Sea Snake' Anti-Ship Missiles aboard a Yukov O-77C TEL.Remastered.
Developed in the late-2090s and fielded by the early-2100s, the N-87 'Sea Snake' ASM system was developed as a direct counter to increasing advancements in Escean ship defences. This hypersonic cruise missile is capable of speeds in excess of Mach 8.3, and can travel up to 600 miles. N-87 missiles are capable of mounting conventional 1000kg high explosive warheads, or a dialable nuclear warhead with a yield between 5-15 kilotons. While the missile itself utilises an all electric vespomide powerplant for cruising flight, the initial launch is conducted with a chemical booster that propels it up to Mach 6, before being jettisoned. The missile then accelerates and drops to an altitude of fifteen feet over water. Over land, the onboard computer will maintain an unobstructed altitude of 200 feet. Wings that deploy upon launch allow the missile to ascend as needed over any other obstacles based on a predetermined route.Β
Sea Snake missiles are transported via Yukov O-77C truck, a variant of the Tactical Combat Truck family manufactured by the Yukov Automotive Works. The missiles themselves are produced by the Nikovic Design Bureau, and supplied in individual, hardened packing containers. Warheads are supplied separately and as required, and are mated in the field by specialist personnel responsible for loading the fully armed missile into the launcher. Two missiles can be carried at a time by each launch vehicle, and frequently operate in a battery of four launchers. Each launcher has its own resupply truck, while a command and control vehicle provides direction, tracking data, and radar coverage for the battery.
Crew: 4 (Driver, Commander, Fire Control Officer, Mechanic)
Length: 9.5m
Width: 3m
Height: 3.6m
Weight: 13t
Armament: 2x N-87 Sea Snake Anti-Ship Missiles
Armour: Graphene-Coated Ceramic Composite
Powerplant: Refuellable Vespomide Battery
Road Speed: 60mph
Related content
Comments: 20
eta-gamma-14 [2023-03-11 13:49:19 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to eta-gamma-14 [2023-03-11 14:22:31 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 0
NebulaWolfz [2013-09-24 21:04:42 +0000 UTC]
S-500 air defense missile system will be capable of destroying not only ICMBs, but also satellites.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to NebulaWolfz [2013-09-24 23:16:39 +0000 UTC]
Ah.
This is just anti-ship, or a theatre ballistic missile launcher if you swap out the pods.Β
Most of the anti-missile or anti-satellite weapons in use in this universe are rail guns or DEW types and mostly space-based.Β
Of course, having a satellite gun that points toward the Earth has the added benefit of hitting a target on it if desired, with the result of a very big boom on impact
π: 0 β©: 1
caiobrazil In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-25 22:53:35 +0000 UTC]
but... newton's third law... won't the recoil from the gun cause the sattelite to accelerate in the direction contrary to the gun (action-reaction), which, in this case, would make it move away from earth, causing it to move through space by inertia?
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to caiobrazil [2013-09-25 22:59:52 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, not sure. Do rail guns produce recoil?
I suppose if they do, the satellite can keep itself in-or return to-position with its RCS thrusters.
π: 0 β©: 1
caiobrazil In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-25 23:08:31 +0000 UTC]
yup. and as most railguns shoot things at extremely high velocities, LOTS of recoil. the bigger the weight and velocity of the projectile, the bigger the recoil; so a big-fucking-ass railguns cannon would produce huge recoil. it's all about newton's third law; action and reaction. the gun propels the projectile; as such, the projectile applies a force of equal power, but opposite direction, to the gun. this also happens with normal firearms; but recoil is augmented by the bolt slamming back, among other things.
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to caiobrazil [2013-09-25 23:22:24 +0000 UTC]
Ah. I was never to sure if they did because the projectile had no explosive propellant and the gun no moving parts, just the magnetic field flinging the projectile forward in a manner similar to a blowgun.
In that case I'll just have to rely on the size of the satellites and their artificial assistants to fire off the necessary burns to counter the recoil and keep them in position or put them back into position.
Thanks for the input .Β
π: 0 β©: 1
caiobrazil In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-25 23:44:16 +0000 UTC]
you could use lasers. they shoot beams of light, which has negligible (if any, i don't remember) mass, and as such negligible, if any, recoil force.
anyways, i would also prefer to use railguns because BOOM is much more fun than PEW.
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to caiobrazil [2013-09-26 00:18:14 +0000 UTC]
Got lasers for point defence, but on a large scale I prefer the railgun as well, in part because since rough atmospheric conditions will have little effect on the projectile. Nothing like a few hundred tons of KE to get the job done . Plus when it comes back into the atmosphere at Mach 10 we get a nice plasma trail for that added psychological effect as opposed to an unseen laser.
π: 0 β©: 1
caiobrazil In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-26 15:14:33 +0000 UTC]
add some sort of whistler (see Stuka dive bomber) for maximum HOLY FCKING SHIT! psychologial effect levels.
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to caiobrazil [2013-09-26 15:38:13 +0000 UTC]
But it would be on you (and everyone in the immediate vicinity) before you heard the sound
The ground rippling and exploding out from the impact point will fill a few extra shorts, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
caiobrazil In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-26 23:15:38 +0000 UTC]
how silly me, i forgot Mach 10 = 10 times faster than the sound
π: 0 β©: 1
thormemeson [2013-09-23 21:59:57 +0000 UTC]
nice although mach 7 is not much in comparison to DEW cwisΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to thormemeson [2013-09-23 22:38:12 +0000 UTC]
Ordinarily they'd try and spam the missiles in an attempt to overwhelm the fleet defences, but with the nuclear warhead they don't really need to get too close since even if they are shot down that are set to detonate.
Escean countermeasures include your conventional Gatling CIWS along with CIPDLs, missiles and fleet perimeter drones, which are a connected pair that attempt to judge the course of an incoming AS missile, fly into the path and sling a net of electrified netting between that first acts to short the computer systems before the detcord filler destroys the missile. You ose the drones but its better than a crippled ship.
π: 0 β©: 1
thormemeson In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-23 22:53:39 +0000 UTC]
Spamming with a nuke seems more like MAD scenario than a fleet battle. A nuke and such makes me think of an end game weapon. If used in a water navy fleet battle it would be used as a last defens.
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to thormemeson [2013-09-23 23:00:51 +0000 UTC]
They'd spam conventional, but not nuclear. Relatively low yield nuclear warheads in the scenario in the information, and only two (since they rushed deployment and decided on those as a deterrent). Similar principal to air launched tactical nuclear missiles being used against carrier fleets had the Cold War gone hot. That and the enemy commanders in charge at the time of the scenario were a little screwy and using a number of less than savoury arsenal and manpower choices.
π: 0 β©: 1
thormemeson In reply to MOAB23 [2013-09-23 23:07:06 +0000 UTC]
Oh I see it can mount nukes but it usually stays conventional although the lack of foresight on the military's part makes sense. Β
π: 0 β©: 1
MOAB23 In reply to thormemeson [2013-09-23 23:13:38 +0000 UTC]
Yep, can switch out between conventional high explosives, a fuel-air type, or nuclear.
π: 0 β©: 0