HOME | DD

Moonlight109 β€” Backup

#sfm #overwatch
Published: 2016-05-18 21:59:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 7447; Favourites: 147; Downloads: 103
Redirect to original
Description Blizzard's DMCA on the SFM Overwatch models has been whitelisted. They were supposedly looking to take down SFMLab's NSFW models, but didn't do their research, and just took down the first ones they stumbled across instead. Which were ours. The SFW, fully clothed ones on the SFM Workshop, where NSFW stuff is banned and not there to begin with. GG guys. It's not like we're giving you free publicity or anything.

Tracer's skin here was a random inverted colors one that didn't turn out too well, but Widowmaker's may or may not be on the model when it gets reuploaded, assuming I remember to remind TFA it's there.

As of right now we still have 5 models to port, and I say 'we' because I do bumpmaps on the hair and everyone else does everything else. Bastion was being rigged, Roadhog had a few last minute discrepancies to fix up, Junkrat is getting hwm flexes, Zenyatta had/has bone problems, and McCree wasn't touched yet, last I heard. Other than that everyone else was ported, and I've heard no news of the different skins in-game being ported, since these 'skins' are technically full other models in a lot of cases.

Also on tumblr!
Related content
Comments: 31

AntiRuler [2025-01-29 01:54:41 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ssaffr01 [2017-05-01 20:30:53 +0000 UTC]

Scary part? Those two could be best friends.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fappmeister [2016-11-15 11:40:15 +0000 UTC]

Awesome Widowmaker! Well done! Id be happy if theyd make for an in game skin

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Fappmeister [2016-11-15 21:56:58 +0000 UTC]

Aaaah thanks! I believe this may be on the more recent Widow model on the workshop, but I'm not sure. I remember handing the files to the modeller but it was a while back.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LGMODS [2016-06-17 20:06:57 +0000 UTC]

Indeed I heard about this wave of ban on SFM models related to Overwatch, but if I understood something from experience well you just can't stop the production and creativity of people on internet, it will come back one day from someone else and they just can't fight against this forever.

Now talking about this Widowmaker & Tracer, it's very interesting to see her in blonde with this alternative colors and human skin, I experimented a human skin for her too but not in blonde, it's a great detail and I totally love it !
Tracer is also good with this random inverted colors, sometime a random test can give a cool result

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to LGMODS [2016-06-17 20:16:53 +0000 UTC]

They can, the legally own the models and the game. Right now they're banning the porn models and any porn pictures, which isn't my problem because I don't use them or make them. But ours were banned because they thought ours were the porn models, apparently. I'm not sure.

And thanks! Widow's greenish color was her purple just inverted, which turned out really well, but then I didn't know what to do with tracer so I inverted her colors too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LA-Kings [2016-06-02 06:59:02 +0000 UTC]

I like Widows look here!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to LA-Kings [2016-06-02 10:10:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, glad to hear!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Undeadman312 [2016-05-31 11:06:15 +0000 UTC]

widowmaker style is awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Undeadman312 [2016-05-31 12:16:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ssaffr01 [2016-05-31 03:12:04 +0000 UTC]

Is that a 'What if...?' skin for Widowmaker?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to ssaffr01 [2016-05-31 04:02:52 +0000 UTC]

Indeed! I gave it to TFA a while back, and he's been going back over his models to update them a bit, so sometime in the future it should/might show up on the model on the workshop for everyone to use. I have no idea when that will be, though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LemonySenpai [2016-05-22 09:15:14 +0000 UTC]

nice! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to LemonySenpai [2016-05-22 19:16:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAdventurerSteve [2016-05-18 22:42:32 +0000 UTC]

Is that Widowmaker?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to TheAdventurerSteve [2016-05-18 23:06:50 +0000 UTC]

Yep.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Detonatress [2016-05-18 22:34:35 +0000 UTC]

Looks so amazing! So someone actually is working on Zenyatta too. Poor McCree though...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Detonatress [2016-05-18 23:10:32 +0000 UTC]

Ah good to hear. We found mccree in mmd and I passed it to tfa to try rigging, but he's very small and the rigging was awful, so I think it was scrapped. i.gyazo.com/1e93e77559178a2dd7…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detonatress In reply to Moonlight109 [2016-05-18 23:13:51 +0000 UTC]

But that could easily be resized, so... what's the problem there?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Detonatress [2016-05-19 00:18:50 +0000 UTC]

Mainly that the bones deform really wrong so it would be better to do it from scratch than edit something that was made badly, I guess. I have no idea how to rig so I don't know what tfa went with in the end.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detonatress In reply to Moonlight109 [2016-05-19 10:27:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, it can be stripped of the bones anyway no matter what port it's from. And since it's in TFA's hands, I know he'll do a pretty good job. Though Strash is the best at face flexes. The expressions he gave Junkrat ... X))

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Detonatress [2016-05-19 18:35:22 +0000 UTC]

Indeed, I think tfa said he wanted to go back over some old ports like widow later on, I noted that strash was doing well with junkrat, so he might hand widow to strash in the future to redo flexes, possibly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detonatress In reply to Moonlight109 [2016-05-19 18:41:22 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. I really wish I could have used more expressive flexes in the latest poster of Widow.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Detonatress [2016-05-19 20:19:22 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I ended up photoshopping her expression on this. Some of the eyebrow controls overpower eachother in places, so it didn't quite look cartoony enough to me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detonatress In reply to Moonlight109 [2016-05-19 20:22:57 +0000 UTC]

Winston needs some cool expressions too.

Oh also, Overwatch twitter has acknowledged Uberchain and several others' fan art done with our ports:
mobile.twitter.com/PlayOverwat…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Detonatress [2016-05-19 20:44:00 +0000 UTC]

Aaaah lovely. I think uber's the only sfm person they've seen. The rest are drawings, far as I remember. They were doing the contest on here I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detonatress In reply to Moonlight109 [2016-05-19 20:48:16 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, they usually post drawing artwork. But hopefully more SFM people make some amazing artwork. There's just heaps of porn, it's about time some people do something for the general audience too. Some time this year I plan on making something like a standup comedy SFM with Overwatch characters, but will definitely need voice actors.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to Detonatress [2016-05-19 21:53:48 +0000 UTC]

Agreed on all that. I wish you luck with finding voice actors, too. You're going to mostly get answers from 10 year olds with bad microphones that say they can voice winston when they clearly can't with such a high voice. I don't know if the usual tf2 people would be willing to swap franchises either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Detonatress In reply to Moonlight109 [2016-05-19 22:02:14 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, likely. Unless some friends can do it, but I've never asked about their mics. And most of Overwatch's fanbase is connected to TF2 anyway so... at this point it's not a matter of swapping franchises, lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

modesskiteer [2016-05-18 22:29:11 +0000 UTC]

LOL, white characters! In a serious note, I'm more willing to work on Junkrat!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moonlight109 In reply to modesskiteer [2016-05-18 23:11:26 +0000 UTC]

Noice, tfa mentioned possibly going over widow's flexes at a later date, plus we both know you're doing flexes on junk right now, so if those work out he might ask you to do widows. We'll see. I'm assuming this is quite a long way off though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0