HOME | DD

Published: 2013-04-22 12:08:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 42748; Favourites: 2018; Downloads: 334
Redirect to original
Description
I hope you like it!T-shirt available at my shop ($15 + shipping): [link]
See more:
Related content
Comments: 135
OuijaBoardum In reply to ??? [2013-04-22 14:28:15 +0000 UTC]
You're the picture of maturity~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OuijaBoardum In reply to DahliaFay [2013-04-22 14:23:37 +0000 UTC]
I know, right? -_-
Nice to see sexism is still active in 2013. OH WAIT.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vittring In reply to OuijaBoardum [2013-04-22 17:26:23 +0000 UTC]
seeing as we're still firmly stuck in the roles we're appointed to depending on our gender - his analogy still works just fine.
saying it's sexism is just ignorant. I'm not saying this is how it Should be or even that I want it to stay like this but, this is how it is and unless women step out of the role men put them in, it will continue as is.
whining don't help, take charge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OuijaBoardum In reply to vittring [2013-04-22 17:34:31 +0000 UTC]
unless women step out of the role men put them in
See that's your problem right there, why is the onus being stuck on the women if you're already admitting men have shoved them into a role? Why can't responsibilities be on both sides in order to change things. Men have to step up too, at least that's what I think.
And last time I checked that analogy is pretty sexist. Saying that a man who puts his dick everywhere is somehow superior to a woman who lets dicks inside her is grade A bullshit. If the analogy were that both sexes are equal in spite of their supposed promiscuity, then it wouldn't be sexist.
But it doesn't, so it is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vittring In reply to OuijaBoardum [2013-04-22 18:20:13 +0000 UTC]
men are in charge because they took it, and noone who got any kind of power will just willingly give it away unless you show you're worthy of having it, and you show that by taking it yourself. it's not some kind of welfare.
also, the women who talk about sexism still seems to be very content having a man at their side taking charge of their relationship and everyday life, I find that hypocritical.
I myself don't want a weak submitted woman, because that would bore me to death. I'm saying this because I want you to know that the above is not my personal opinion but simply as I see it.
you want to 'fix' the issue about sexism? well fix it. don't ask around for help that will never come, change your surroundings/situation yourself. you get in charge by taking charge - it's as simple as that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OuijaBoardum In reply to vittring [2013-04-22 18:30:18 +0000 UTC]
The funny thing is, I hear this kind of drivel a lot; and the same kind of men who say this are the first to call a strong/capable woman who does take charge a 'bitch'.
And no, it's not some kind of welfare, you're right. What it is, is basic human decency, and not a lot of people seem to have it these days. Shame.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vittring In reply to OuijaBoardum [2013-04-22 19:05:47 +0000 UTC]
shame huh.
there's a big difference between strong/confident, and bitchy. being a stuckup 'bitch' usually means you have low selfesteem and put on this mask to hide it from others by keeping them at bay.
and decency? what the hell do decency have to do with changing sexism? decency is a word people like to use when explaining how much better they are compared to others, a word favored by awefully rich people or just ones who Wants to be. incidentally, sexism is even More apparant in families with a strong hierarchy. how decent of them.
strong women are rare. people follow sterotypes way too much, using them as some kind of shield so they don't have to expose themselves or take any kind of responsibility. it's comfortable, isn't it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OuijaBoardum In reply to vittring [2013-04-22 19:17:52 +0000 UTC]
Wow hon, I feel sorry for you; your opinions are awfully skewed... :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OuijaBoardum In reply to ??? [2013-04-22 14:20:32 +0000 UTC]
A better way for you to have phrased it would have been, “I approve of promiscuous males, and I disapprove of promiscuous females.”
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
A-star-G In reply to OuijaBoardum [2013-04-22 21:19:53 +0000 UTC]
if only your comments had a like button
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OuijaBoardum In reply to A-star-G [2013-04-22 21:25:57 +0000 UTC]
Haha! I know, right? Would be nice to have them, but people might complain that facebook was taking over xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZosimPaul In reply to OuijaBoardum [2013-04-22 14:22:24 +0000 UTC]
No. It was about the locks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OuijaBoardum In reply to ZosimPaul [2013-04-22 14:24:21 +0000 UTC]
Hm, I've only ever heard this analogy used in respects to genitalia, so... Not really inclined to believe you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZosimPaul In reply to OuijaBoardum [2013-04-22 14:25:59 +0000 UTC]
You perceive the information as you wish. I see here a lock and key.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vittring In reply to ZosimPaul [2013-04-22 17:22:26 +0000 UTC]
so lame, stick to the joke : <
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BenRusk [2013-04-22 13:45:29 +0000 UTC]
This is so cleaver....i'm getting dirty thoughts from the key and key hole.. something is wrong with my brain xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zeraful In reply to RetSamys [2013-04-22 13:57:32 +0000 UTC]
you know, the "key" and the "keyhole"
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TheArchosaurQueen In reply to zeraful [2013-06-19 06:30:18 +0000 UTC]
Well it seems to me, that this "keyhole" wants another "keyhole".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zeraful In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2013-06-21 15:21:08 +0000 UTC]
You read too much yaoi...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev |