HOME | DD

NaturePunk β€” Retrieving the Arrow

Published: 2012-08-05 07:56:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 20516; Favourites: 1116; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description This was project intended to exemplify humanity's modern disconnection from Nature. The hunter is wearing modern clothes and exists in a modern setting, yet is using primitive weapons and techniques to 'survive' in a world which has been all but destroyed by Man's inability to live in harmony with the planet.

The wolf in the image is called Teva. She's my personal headdress. She and her sister were both removed from a population in Southeast Alaska by a friend of mine who works with the State Fish and Wildlife Department in population control.

Once Teva was tanned so that she could not rejoin the Earth, I purchased her to make her into the headdress above. Due to some damage to the leather and a missing rear foot, her hide was not deemed suitable for traditional taxidermy and would be otherwise bound for the fur market to be made into clothing instead.

She is the first wolf I ever mounted, and I’m very pleased with the way she turned out considering. From start to finish, it seemed that Teva’s creation from tanned pelt to finished headdress came together like a dream.

Photography by Teddy Anderson. Editing and taxidermy by me.
Related content
Comments: 412

paulinac In reply to ??? [2013-08-22 21:18:09 +0000 UTC]

I'm really happy there are still some decent people out there. Able to have a normal conversation and actually see things for what they are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

slight-art-obsession In reply to paulinac [2013-08-23 02:29:14 +0000 UTC]

Holy God, I know people who have children with mental disabilities who would say that you are hardly a decent person. One couple in particular who love their youngest just as fiercely as they do the two eldest, who were completely "normal". To suggest that just because someone doesn't fit your ideal they should aborted, you are some kind of monster.

If you're so again humanity, feel free to remove yourself from the rest of us. Go live with the wolves... I'd love to see what they do to you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

ChikitaWolf In reply to slight-art-obsession [2013-08-24 01:07:02 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Koeskull In reply to slight-art-obsession [2013-08-23 14:33:17 +0000 UTC]

Β I know someone (not on here) that feels people like that should be aborted because it's unnatural for them to live.. if natural selection could run it's course they'd never survive (depending). It's not made up "ideal". It's just fact that humans are wildly overpopulated and are destroying the environment, not just for other animals but for ourselves. If someone thinks with logic and not with emotion, reducing the human population is an obvious thing to do.Β  Also removing ourselves wont help. If someone's against something wrong in society, do you really think it would fix it if they just went away?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AvisCelox In reply to Koeskull [2013-08-23 15:57:38 +0000 UTC]

Natural selection still does run its course. We aren't "outside" or "apart from" or even "above" nature. The sense of altruism instilled by natural selection is the reason these people aren't left to die. Natural selection is still affecting them even though they don't die right away, especially (but not exclusively) if they aren't reproducing.

We can combat overpopulation by encouraging fewer births, using science to increase efficient use of resources and increase the Earth's carrying capacity, and in the future even populating other planets without life forms to bother. But while this is happening, we still need to manage wildlife for their own sake. A few wolves dying is better than a thousand wolves starving (then dying).

Borderline genocide is entirely unnecessary. Besides, when people/animals/etc are considered equal to each other under the law (you want this, right?), it means they're equal . If you'd kill off a person because you don't like them or think they're valuable to society, are you ready to do the same thing to wolves?

Heck, we could go further. If organisms can't adapt to the changing environment and climate, they should die off, right? Predation is a force in natural selection, even human predation. Let the wolves be hunted.
"Natural selection," right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Koeskull In reply to AvisCelox [2013-08-23 16:51:13 +0000 UTC]

Β But, genocide!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AvisCelox In reply to Koeskull [2013-08-23 18:19:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AvisCelox In reply to AvisCelox [2013-08-23 15:58:50 +0000 UTC]

* not valuable

I think you know what I meant though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheHomicidalRedHead In reply to slight-art-obsession [2013-08-23 03:51:02 +0000 UTC]

So many people seem to be against humanity and it's ridiculous. I completely agree with what you said to this guy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

slight-art-obsession In reply to TheHomicidalRedHead [2013-08-23 03:55:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

I have a soft spot for animals, including wolves, but to advocate culling humanity based on some arbitrary standard is monstrous. Man is one of the dominant species here on Earth, that's indisputable. I am all for being responsible and doing what we can for the endangered species (and making sure others don't join that list), but having more pity for a wolf pelt than a human life?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheHomicidalRedHead In reply to slight-art-obsession [2013-08-23 04:02:31 +0000 UTC]

I am right there with you. I just can't believe the comments people have been throwing around. o.O

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Koeskull In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 21:51:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paulinac In reply to ??? [2013-08-22 21:10:24 +0000 UTC]

murderers*Β  Sorry for the typos...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CA-WOLF In reply to ??? [2013-08-22 20:47:32 +0000 UTC]

Then I'll guess you're happy about the new attack in Syria where over 1300 people lost their lives!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paulinac In reply to CA-WOLF [2013-08-22 20:54:52 +0000 UTC]

I don't even care about that kind of things. I feel more sorry for a dog that has been hit by a car than a buscrash or anything like that.
Before you go all wait untill something bad happens to someone you love Well, shit happens.
Plus, people killing people?? Newsflash, we are destroying ourselves and everything around us. I don't understand why people are still shocked when they hear about such attacks/accidents etc.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

ponyfluff In reply to paulinac [2013-10-01 22:52:16 +0000 UTC]

dumpfm.s3.amazonaws.com/images…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

klefkis In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 23:47:35 +0000 UTC]

it saddens me that people are more upset about an animal dying than a human dying

shit does happen to humans as does it to animals so i dont see why youre so passive with humans dying but not with a dog getting hit by a car LMAO and you wonder why the human race is spiraling

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DiosApollos In reply to klefkis [2013-08-23 04:33:10 +0000 UTC]

Guess what...humans are animals.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

AvisCelox In reply to DiosApollos [2013-08-23 16:00:40 +0000 UTC]

Yes, and animals naturally favor their own species over others.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DiosApollos In reply to AvisCelox [2013-08-24 01:04:15 +0000 UTC]

I love all species equally.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AvisCelox In reply to DiosApollos [2013-08-24 01:41:42 +0000 UTC]

Many people do as well, though it's not the first instinct. But that's fine too. It's certainly not harming anyone The issue I have is with using a liking of other animals as an excuse for misanthropy, for example being more concerned with the death of a single dog than the deaths of hundreds of people, as the person a few comments above does. That just isn't right or healthy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DiosApollos In reply to AvisCelox [2013-08-24 02:29:20 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I agree.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

klefkis In reply to DiosApollos [2013-08-23 10:41:47 +0000 UTC]

no shit sherlock but we are an independent "species" and we dont give a shit if our own "species" dies but oh! no! a dog got hit by a car! for the sake of everything i would hope everyone would save a human life if given the choice between saving a human and some other animal but apparently thats not that case with your fuckin satanic logic
my comment wasnt directed at you anyway so idk what the hell youre doing here

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DiosApollos In reply to klefkis [2013-08-24 01:03:34 +0000 UTC]

My Satanic logic? When did I say anything?

You were talking like humans weren't animals or something so I was just correcting you. No need to get so butthurt. lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

klefkis In reply to DiosApollos [2013-08-24 01:15:58 +0000 UTC]

its snide to assume i dont know what the hell humans are i never said anywhere about their connection nor do i care
i just want to know why the hell someone as dumb as this person thinks other animals deserve more than humans should??????

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DiosApollos In reply to klefkis [2013-08-24 02:31:17 +0000 UTC]

I don't know. I'm an equalist.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

klefkis In reply to DiosApollos [2013-08-24 12:59:17 +0000 UTC]

well yeah i mean im not like YEAHH I HATE ANIMALS WERE WAY COOLER THAN THEM LETS KILL THEM ALL i have pets and stuff i love but
im going to be a lot more upset when a family member or friend dies than if my cat or bird or dog dies???? the way people are putting it is that they dont give a rats ass if their mom dies but if they see roadkill on the street theyll burst into tears like wtf?????

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CA-WOLF In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 20:59:05 +0000 UTC]

I feel sorry for you, I truly do.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paulinac In reply to CA-WOLF [2013-08-22 21:05:31 +0000 UTC]

I feel sorry for all those people that can't face reality and claim to be the "upper species" in this world.
No need to feel sorry haha, I wouldn't feel sorry for you whatever would happen Β Β  You see, I don't feel sorry for humans. At least 98% of them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CA-WOLF In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 21:12:18 +0000 UTC]

Please do not get kids!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paulinac In reply to CA-WOLF [2013-08-22 21:16:55 +0000 UTC]

Haha, well I don't plan having any. Unless I shit golden eggs. No seriously, I'm not a redneck that breeds like a rabbit and then lives off their children's paycheck.

Oh, that's a great 'population control' addition. Illegal/not allowed to have kids unless you're able to afford one! 60%of the world would be put down at once.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

goats In reply to paulinac [2013-08-23 00:49:27 +0000 UTC]

holy shit you have issuesΒ 


I used to think like you once upon a time, and wow I cant believe how stupid I used to sound. (except I did then and will always support hunting and taxidermy art) You're young, and hopefully one say you'll change and become a better person like I did..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paulinac In reply to goats [2013-08-23 04:38:24 +0000 UTC]

lol get over yourself. Better person like you? Hell, I'd never want to be anyone but myself.
It's sad people 'change' because society wants them to. But oh well, you're just a part of the gray mass that wasn't able to stand their ground.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

goats In reply to paulinac [2013-08-23 04:44:08 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, and your a psycho child who values the life of some animal more than your own family.Β 

NO animal ever should be above the life of a human being no matter how strongly yo feel.

I bet you're just one of those PETA terrorists.Β 

I am deeply sorry you have not grown up enough to realize these things.Β 


Now, I dont fight with children so we're done here, have a nice day. Β Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paulinac In reply to goats [2013-08-23 04:50:03 +0000 UTC]

Say whatever you want. Funny thing is you don't even know me
As I said, you're a part of the grey mass. Believeing that humans are the center of the world and everything should be made by humans' rules. The thing is, humans are animals too. You, nor me, nor anyone else is less animal than those wolves.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CA-WOLF In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 21:20:49 +0000 UTC]

You're evil... I like you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CooroJaden In reply to ??? [2013-08-22 20:46:35 +0000 UTC]

Well this would be a good thing to say.. to the hunters of the creature?
Wolves are beautiful and I think you are right to be angry.. but please don't cut down this art for only including a wolf pelt.
The wolf is dead by the hands of others. Not this artist. If the wolf is already dead, why not use the beauty of the wolf for
art, if not for anything else... more... vulgar.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paulinac In reply to CooroJaden [2013-08-22 20:51:00 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that wolf is already dead and it's too late. Can't do anything about it. Though by this kind of 'art' (well I have a different definition of art) it makes it look "okay" to kill animals instead of pointing at the cause of those so called "overpopulation". Us, humans. We are the reason this world is going to hell.Β  (- for example, we are driving wild animals to smaller and smaller territories. Result: those animals either attack us/live in the cities OR end up like that dead wolf. People hunt deer and wolves for fun. In reality, nature is meant to keep itself in balance, we shouldn't interface with it in any way. In fact, we are the cause of al the shit happening, so why not do something about 'us' and the way we live? That's how I see it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CooroJaden In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 21:25:01 +0000 UTC]

I understand this and it is a smart way to think. There are indeed too many of us humans plaguing the earth for its own health. But I didn't say it was 'okay' to kill them at all, really. I only said your rant is misdirected and my point there still stands.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kitsumekat In reply to ??? [2013-08-22 20:42:28 +0000 UTC]

When ever womeone says population control on humans, they're the last ones to volunteer.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

uchuubranko In reply to kitsumekat [2013-08-22 20:48:33 +0000 UTC]

LOL.

How about limiting the whole planet population reproduction to 1 per person. How about encouraging people to ADOPT abandoned children even if there's a tough process ahead?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

kitsumekat In reply to uchuubranko [2013-08-22 21:11:59 +0000 UTC]

They tried that before. Look at China.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

uchuubranko In reply to kitsumekat [2013-08-22 21:25:36 +0000 UTC]

Failed once = never never try it again ?

No.

Other ideas I don't have. Maybe a mass suicide? Hoping for an alien to throw giants at us and let them eat the wise man species?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

kitsumekat In reply to uchuubranko [2013-08-22 21:44:05 +0000 UTC]

1. It failed because they didn't tweak it.

2. Also done that. Didn't help.

3. Even aliens are not that desperate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paulinac In reply to uchuubranko [2013-08-22 21:31:17 +0000 UTC]

LOL I WISH I HAD A DEATHNOTE

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paulinac In reply to kitsumekat [2013-08-22 21:22:27 +0000 UTC]

The fact their society/System is fucked up made that population control project fail.
Everybody wants to have a son in China, why? because they're able to take care of the parents when they're old. (financially) Girls are a burden.Β  They never mention it but you have to keep in mind how much people had an abortus(in secret)Β because they wanted to have a boy instead of a girl? I can imagine women throwing themselves off the stairs to prevent a gril from being born!! That's how it works/worked there.

If the gril-boy ratio would be kept normal and mentality more decent, I don't see how that population control wouldn't work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kitsumekat In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 21:43:04 +0000 UTC]

Because even with the boy girl ration being decent, it still would not stop population control. You're looking at humans, not the land that they're on.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paulinac In reply to uchuubranko [2013-08-22 20:57:16 +0000 UTC]

Voila.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paulinac In reply to kitsumekat [2013-08-22 20:46:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm going to repeat myself on every stupid reply to my post.
I'm not like you people. By population control I'd lean towards : Don't let some people 'breed' and spread their genes hehe.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

kitsumekat In reply to paulinac [2013-08-22 21:11:48 +0000 UTC]

Which is stupid given the fact you would spread your genes anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>