HOME | DD

Published: 2012-08-28 00:42:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 4909; Favourites: 62; Downloads: 74
Redirect to original
Description
Let's try some word association, first word...MP7!Just a quick doodle that I ended up cleaning and coloring the day after, wanted to give a try for the HK MP7 and Pro-Tec helmet.
Related content
Comments: 50
NDTwoFives In reply to RDFAF [2012-10-28 03:54:02 +0000 UTC]
Not yet :/
But expect more, been doodling her a bit more lately (Back then it was an experiment for all sort of things).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to CzechBiohazard [2012-10-21 21:41:48 +0000 UTC]
Glad you like my older works, that style keeps changing every month or so. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CzechBiohazard In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-10-22 13:49:35 +0000 UTC]
Of course. Hey now, your artwork is still good nonetheless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to CzechBiohazard [2012-10-22 17:20:58 +0000 UTC]
Thank you good sir. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BTR90 [2012-08-28 13:29:13 +0000 UTC]
nice work it all seems right although give me a Kriss V
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to BTR90 [2012-08-28 17:18:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I was a bit indecisive between the Vector and MP7 while drawing, might give a go for it some day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BTR90 In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-08-28 17:21:53 +0000 UTC]
one can cut through armor the other punches through
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to BTR90 [2012-08-28 17:27:25 +0000 UTC]
One should never underestimate the power of a .45 ACP round. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jailgurdnegative In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-08-29 14:22:42 +0000 UTC]
oh yea, that ought to do the trick.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ravajava [2012-08-28 04:13:29 +0000 UTC]
Nice work as always. Proportions are better than usual, might I add
Funny, I just started watching Flashpoint, and I was going to draw a Toronto SRU officer when this popped up
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Ravajava [2012-08-28 17:16:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, tried to draw longer faces this time btw. :3
You know what they say: Great minds think alike! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NDTwoFives In reply to Messenger-Of-Chaos [2012-08-28 17:16:05 +0000 UTC]
lol, you just reminded of "Machete".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Streaked-Silver [2012-08-28 03:28:55 +0000 UTC]
i actualyl have a rig not to different from that, though i have full padding on my arms for hand to hand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-08-28 03:31:27 +0000 UTC]
I picked the set-up from a well equipped paintball player I met the other day. How the arms padding look like?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-08-28 04:16:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SomeNavySEALs [2012-08-28 02:51:01 +0000 UTC]
First word that comes to mind? Tiny.
I don't think anyone will ever prove to me the MP7 isn't really a BB gun.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to SomeNavySEALs [2012-08-28 02:53:07 +0000 UTC]
Sadly enough, some video games are portraying it as one.
Tiny but powerful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SomeNavySEALs In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-08-28 02:59:23 +0000 UTC]
Tiny and... tiny.
It's 4.6mm man, that's little more than .177 cal airguns use. It may go through cheap armor but it won't do anything when it gets to the squishy parts.
*Counts anything less than 6.5 as less than bullets*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to SomeNavySEALs [2012-08-28 03:38:50 +0000 UTC]
SomeNavySEALs, I use 5.56 and I've seen the 4.6 in action, it may be a small round, but its meant for spot on shot taking rather then spray and pray, The size of the round is not directly related to how powerful it is.
The 9 mm is a weaker round because of the lack of penetration the shape has and yet the size and powder behind it does not give it the 40 through 50's "you're on your ass now" kick to them.
The 4.6 is very useful for the situations a close quarters Machine Pistol would be used for. besides, if you want to use a 6.5 or a 7.62 in an enclosed urban environment where over penetration is a problem.. you're an idiot that doesn't know much about how urban operations, specially set in heavy civilian populations work.
the 5.56 is a good round for conventional warfare, where believe it or not, the goal of shooting an opposing soldier isn't to kill them, its to wound them so they go back to the medical tents and cause a Supply strain on the back lines so the front line feels the stress as well. It wont hurt a war effort as much to outright kill someone on the field as it would to injure them and take them out of the fight.. causing them to have to be evacuated (expensive) have surgery (expensive) Fed (redirecting food supply.. costly) treated and watched (man power wasted) then simply "well he's dead, we'll pick him up later when we can"
Not to mention in urban operations such as SWAT, you dont want to KILL the personm you want to disable them to take them i for questioning. Dead Men tell no tales, But someone who is taken in. treated well and shown "hey we are not the bad guys" spills their guts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SomeNavySEALs In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-08-28 04:03:15 +0000 UTC]
I can understand the theoretical application for police units, however many police would attest that smaller, non-manstopper rounds are not sufficient in life-and-death situations.
I am well aware of the 5.56's concept and it has shown time and time again that it is only useful for conventional warfare, which I will admit, it sorta preforms well at, but we haven't been doing a hell of a lot of conventional fighting against people who give two damns if they live. It should be noted that the M16 preformed better than anyone could have possibly hoped in Iraq when during the early stages Marines equipped with ACOGs got too many headshots for the bean-counters, this is the only exception to the 5.56's long history of sucking and that was because some of the best shooters on earth were forced to use it.
As for overpenetration, the 4.6 is, as you know, a high velocity armor piercing round which means it tends to go through stuff and things (though if it hits someone after that they might not notice) when in a situation one would be presented that would require a machine pistol/PDW thing the general nature of encounters would suggest a weapon capable of knocking a target to the ground instantly would be preferred to a weapon designed to inflict long term casualties (back to the supply chain, hospitals and such) that could shred the threat while still presenting the opportunity for them to do the same.
...I do believe we may crowd the comment section x_>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to SomeNavySEALs [2012-08-28 04:28:29 +0000 UTC]
The theory works for conventional war as well. And yes while we are not in a conventional war, i do agree we need larger rounds, the 6.5 is the perfect in between for 5.56 and 7.62. And yes Police do need to be better armed, I've read to many things about them being outgunned in fights they should be dominating. how ever most police units can get ger as they see fit to aid their police AND most that i have talked to do carry their own pistols (usually a 40 or larger) in case they need to permanently drop someone.
And yes, we do tend to exceed expectations don't we? .. give us an accurate rifle with an ACOG? well hey head shot city. though i would love to trade in the AR platform for ...any of several choices. the charging handle is in a retarded place on that design. Every Marine a Rifleman, and we can hit peoples domes from 800 meters away with an ACOG and a steady breeze.
Yes the 4.6 is for armor penetration and while one shot hitting may not be noticed, I've talked to some of my Sergents who have deployed who said Marines got hit in the leg by 7.62 and didn't know it till they where told "dude you're bleeding all over the place, The human body.. as remarkable as it is. cant take the shock of 2 or 3 rounds entering the same spot. SWAT usually has a series of non leathle things to use as well before they pull out the firearm and paste you to the wall. During one training with them they Flash banged AND CS Gased me with two grenades thrown into the room at once, i was cuffed and on my face before i knew what happend. .. >.> Cheating bastards.
My point is..if you get a burst to the chest with that weapon, you're not gonna be having a wonderful time, nor possibly could you react well enough to return fire unless you're just that much of a beast. (we're taught to shoot 3 rounds into a terrorist fighter even if he goes down after the first one) and a burst to the face will pretty much instantly incapacitate or out right kill you. I do think something like the Criss V super would work well for SWAT (and the military, i'd like Mechanics, Drivers and pilots to have them personally) but the MP7 defiantly has a place. I'd take it over my fricken m9 Beretta
Yes.. Crowd the comments.. with KNOWLEDGE! D8< *evil laugh*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NDTwoFives In reply to Ghillied-up [2012-08-28 02:26:01 +0000 UTC]
But drawing defines a big part of me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Ghillied-up [2012-08-28 02:37:11 +0000 UTC]
Will do!
You need to get back at drawing as well!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Soap971 [2012-08-28 01:32:35 +0000 UTC]
Tacticool girl and MP7 :3 I guess my life's almost complete now :'D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Soap971 [2012-08-28 01:59:15 +0000 UTC]
Suddenly, it seems that SMGs fits well to female operators. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Soap971 In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-08-28 02:01:28 +0000 UTC]
Of course. Smaller, less bulky :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Soap971 [2012-08-28 02:02:17 +0000 UTC]
And packing a lot of firepower!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vergruizer [2012-08-28 01:00:44 +0000 UTC]
Nice one! have you tried inking before scanning? It'll give your drawing a more cleaner look.
ps: love the detail you've managed to put in the gear
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to vergruizer [2012-08-28 01:03:19 +0000 UTC]
Used to ink before, now I'm just using the good 'ole pencil lines. It's kinda hard to ink a small doodle btw ^^
Thanks, I'm always looking on the interwebs to pick the correct gear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NDTwoFives In reply to Haduge [2012-08-28 01:02:18 +0000 UTC]
Been a gun nut isn't a bad thing. =X
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HuntraG94 [2012-08-28 00:52:25 +0000 UTC]
don't answer the the last comment I just found out it is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to HuntraG94 [2012-08-28 01:01:48 +0000 UTC]
lawl! read the description before!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NDTwoFives In reply to thegreekweegee [2012-08-28 00:47:07 +0000 UTC]
Good question, I did the MP7 because it looked easier, P90 has such an unconventional design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0