HOME | DD

Published: 2007-04-01 16:57:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 608; Favourites: 1; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description
Scout Interactive approached me to do their agencies branding and website. They are a very small interactive design shop, based in the uptown area of minneapolis. They came to me with the classic predicament of wanting to come across as very technical, and precise, and hip - but also to epitomize a small businesses characteristics (IE. outstanding service, friendlyness, responsiveness, etc..)This is where we are after two rounds of pursing many different avenues. I'll be making considerable headway on this logo over the next two weeks, so please feel free to chime in with your two cents. Its still very much up in the air.
WIP = Work In Progress
Related content
Comments: 20
aes-unleashed [2007-04-25 14:31:14 +0000 UTC]
i like the depth, but what do you think about the placement and type of interactive? for me it seems abit out of place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cberry240 [2007-04-06 15:52:24 +0000 UTC]
I have to agree with Liquisoft's comments. I fail to understand the treatment of scout it just looks really odd maybe I'm missing something...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nedw In reply to cberry240 [2007-04-06 15:57:46 +0000 UTC]
i feel like its close to something 'new' here, sadly the client is having me go in another direction. I also agree with liquisoft - I don't think its there yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cberry240 In reply to nedw [2007-04-06 16:02:45 +0000 UTC]
Clients...pfffft, typical! Good luck please post it when you finish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
saynt [2007-04-02 07:43:45 +0000 UTC]
If it's a WIP, it probably shouldn't be posted anywhere (especially deviantart) until it's finished. Just like when making websites for someone; you dont upload them for the public until they're done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
cberry240 In reply to saynt [2007-04-06 15:59:23 +0000 UTC]
I disagree. I think that posting a WIP and getting comments is no different than having a critique or review of the piece in order to get feedback.
When creating a website/creative typically it's uploaded/printed rto be tested and/or reviewed by others unless you completely work in a vacuum.
This might not be an option for him so here or a place like HOW Forums would be the next best place. Once he arrives at a final solution he can change the image and description.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
saynt In reply to cberry240 [2007-04-07 06:08:23 +0000 UTC]
some good points there, but you need to keep in mind that he's working for a real client. Things like logos should probably be kept in-house.. just like doctor - patient confidentiality, same goes with design.
I think so anyway. If i had someone doing the branding identity for my business i wouldn't want them showing their WIP's to the world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nedw In reply to saynt [2007-04-03 20:31:16 +0000 UTC]
thank you for the feedback on the logo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fatally6Yours [2007-04-01 23:41:40 +0000 UTC]
nice logo, works w/ + w/o color.
the angle gives it depth.
does anyone else find it strange that an "interactive design" firm needs someone to design a logo and website? Is that not what they do?
I'm not familiar with scout.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nedw In reply to Fatally6Yours [2007-04-03 20:32:25 +0000 UTC]
alot of agencies like other agencies to brand them. its tough to brand yourself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
spookDD [2007-04-01 23:12:11 +0000 UTC]
ned wright knows right. aka gradients are the wave of the future. scout is a fun project to watch develop, looking forward to the finals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arsenicpants [2007-04-01 22:21:38 +0000 UTC]
i agree with Liquisoft
Also, i'd like to say that from a purely ergonomic standpoint, the way the U and the T touch is really bothering me
i'm not sure why, i think it's the angles at which the stroke ends are pointed
great work so far though
gradients are fun
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nedw In reply to arsenicpants [2007-04-03 20:34:42 +0000 UTC]
yeah, I agree with him too. I've had the U/T touching comment before, I'll work it.
Thanks tho
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cherie327 [2007-04-01 17:42:56 +0000 UTC]
I think the second one definitely captured most of the characteristics they wanted to present. Friendliness from the crisp and bright colors; technical, precise, and hip from the fonts, etc etc.
Good Luck with this project!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TheRyanFord [2007-04-01 17:13:31 +0000 UTC]
I like the general qualities of the work but to me there still is something missing.
The idea of "scout" feels very campfire-like. I'm not saying you should draw a campfire, but I am suggesting you could perhaps imply some stick-like shaping to the letterforms. I actually think they can retain some of the technical nature they currently have, but introducing some bumps and knots could help have the dual meaning of camping, outdoors, or whatever. Camping/scout also implies boyscouts, which are very honorable, hardworking, trustworthy people. Boyscouts have the kind of image that any company would love to portray.
I also feel that the lockup, at this point, feels a bit disjointed. In my opinion, "interactive" is actually getting a lot more attention than it probably should. Perhaps try it at an angle similar to the "scout" logotype and see if you can lock it up in that way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nedw In reply to TheRyanFord [2007-04-03 20:33:32 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for all the feedback. Totally agree. I'll be workin on it all this week.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0