HOME | DD
Nekromanda β Bully on the Playground
Published: 2012-12-17 00:20:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 3409; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
"The bully on the playground intimidates people - that's what he does, intimidates people into silence, into fear, into avoiding the bully. And often times the bully is the paper tiger, and when the righteous individual, who is being bullied, defends his or herself and punches the bully in the mouth, guess what? The bully more times than not has a glass jaw. Falls down, then everyone on the playground says 'whoa, the bully was a weakling after all.' That's the secularist left, the secularist left are bullies. They try to bully and intimidate, and push religious intolerance and religious bigotry on everyone else."Who is the real bully?
'Atheists should be punched in the mouth' says Christian Host -
Related content
Comments: 67
You forgot the hypocritical 2nd Amendment. The bigots I know preach Christ but wouldn't hesitate to shoot an unarmed man.
π: 1 β©: 3
"One man with a gun can control one hundred without one." - Vladimir Lenin.
π: 0 β©: 1
That is debatable weather Lenin actually said that.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I said as much in a different post on the controversy of if he said it or not.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Christian Love my ass...
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah only the goverment should own all guns. Works so well in N. Korea, China, Cuba, Saudia Arabia, Iran etc etc etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually most of those countries have very loose restrictions on weapons. Did you know it's legal to own an RPG in Iran?
π: 0 β©: 1
YouΒ can "operate" an RPG in Iran if you "join"Β 1 of there "martyr militias"
π: 0 β©: 1
*their, not there.
Also Iran is fairly stable compared to the US. Elections happen frequently and the military is under the control of the President. Did you know that they elected a moderate to the Presidency last year? Β Yep, his name isΒ Hassan Rouhani.Β
I wouldn't expect you to learn about other countries. In fact, I'm mildly surprised you even know that a world exists outside the United States.
So, what was your point?
π: 0 β©: 1
Uh no. Iran is under contoll of the Mullas. They can call 4 an election anytime they want.
π: 0 β©: 1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_β¦
While it is a Theocracy, it is a Republic. Meaning that the people elect leaders.
Not a true democracy, but it's similar to the US.
π: 0 β©: 1
I ment the Mullas hold the true power in Iran not the people.
π: 0 β©: 1
But the people elect the Mullahs. It's similar to the United States as I just stated. Are you missing the point?
π: 0 β©: 1
Im pretty sure only Mullahs elect other Mullahs & not the people.
π: 0 β©: 1
If the Mullahs elect the Mullahs, would then the Mallah be the Mallahs' Mallah? And how would you get new Mallahs?
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe the Mullahs got all the "moolah"
π: 0 β©: 1
But then how do new Mullahs come to power?
π: 0 β©: 1
i think mullahs are allowed to "reproduce"
π: 0 β©: 1
But wouldn't that release non-Mullah blood into the line?
π: 0 β©: 1
They gotta find "pure" females!
π: 0 β©: 1
But if they do find pure females, wouldn't the lines then diminish?
π: 0 β©: 1
Uhhhhhh u lost me. How u define a "pure female"?
π: 0 β©: 1
Complete royal blood, or whatever that is
π: 0 β©: 1
oh. i thaught it had sumtin 2 do with virginity.
π: 0 β©: 0
Liberals bully gun owners. What's the difference, both sides are messed up
π: 0 β©: 1
We don't bully gun owners-we bully the NRA, which represents gun MANUFACTURERS.
π: 0 β©: 1
What do gun manufacturers do? I'm in favor of 0 gun control outside of background checks.
Other than that, I say let people own all the AK's, M-16's or whatever assualt weapons they want. However, the only thing I disagree with the NRA on is background checks.
Other than that, I agree with them mostly
π: 0 β©: 1
So you disagree with gun legislation such as the banning of lead bullets-lead is toxic, and the California version of this law let gun owners exchange their lead bullets for bismuth ones free of charge-and requiring guns not in use to be locked in a certified gun safe-to prevent both thieves and young children from getting a hold of them?
π: 0 β©: 1
Lead is toxic, but not just from touching it. The only people at risk from lead bullets are animals. True, animals are at risk from eating shell casing, and lead fumes can be harmful during the production if you aren't careful making them. But lead bullets are as dangerous as a lead pipe.
However, abrubtly haulting the production of a multi-million dollar industry just to save some animals that we were planning on killing anyway is a waste of time and a lot of money, especially if you expect the government to replace everyones bullets.
And as for that "Locking them up" thing... Well, the problem is lack of education. Gun education needs to be taught in school, you wouldn't have kids taking guns and playing with them if you simply taught children gun safety. Plus, when someone robs your house, you want a gun to be in the most convienient place possible so you can easilly use it. A safe isn't as practical as your nightstand. Robbers aren't going to wait until your finished opening the safe. It's like Illinois. They got this idiodic law that demands all guns that are in vehicles be in a locked case. That's dumb because it means you can't use it when you need it.
π: 0 β©: 1
The major problem with lead bullets is that they poison scavenger animals (including the critically endangered California condor) which eat shot corpses. As for "protecting the economy", that same argument could also apply to nuclear weapons tests, unsanitary food processing facilities, and puppy mills.
And if you are going to take your gun with you in public, then you can take one extra minute to get it out if you wish to use it. Your right to have a weapon ends where everyone else's right to feel safe in public begins.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, I think nuclear weapons tests are nessasary as long as nuclear weapons are nessasary. I think nuclear weapons are a good thing and help avoid real wars. If Israel for example had no nuclear weapons, they'd already have been destroyed.
"And if you are going to take your gun with you in public, then you can take one extra minute to get it out if you wish to use it"
Where do I start...
The only time I would need to take a gun out in public is in an emergency, I.E. A car jacker. Do you think a car jacker would wait for me to get my gun out of a box?
And you have the right to BE safe, not FEEL safe. You might feel unsafe by me having a gun, but in reality you are safer.
Just like I FEEL unsafe by gay people getting married. So by your arguement, it should be illegal since it makes me FEEL unsafe.
I can FEEL unsafe easilly, it's called being a parinoid idiot. But in reality, me having a gun and being able to defend myself makes the whole country safer. And by forcing me to keep my gun in a place where I can't use it for emergencies isn't making anyone safe
π: 0 β©: 1
There's a thing called two fists. Use them to defend yourself. I've taken on a gun-totter and I'm still alive. (I even took down the guy)
Also gay-marrige makes you feel unsafe? Wow, you are the wimpiest person I know.
π: 0 β©: 1
You are a fucking idiot. Are you literally telling me to bring my fists to a gun fight? Are you on drugs?
You beating up an armed man is pretty awesome I must admit. However, how is that an arguement in favor of gun control? Just because you happened to be very lucky and not get shot doesn't mean everyone is in that possition.
So if a four foot female was attacked by a 6 foot man with a lead pipe, then I guess she shoudln't use her gun. She should try to fight the armed guy.
Did you just come here to brag about beating an armed guy up? Or are you really that much of a selfish idiot that you think that everyone in the world is as big and lucky as you.
Why don't you go to a 12 yr old rape victim and ask her, "Why didn't you just use your fists?"
Is that really your arguement? You must be the stupidest person I've seen. And I don't really feel unsafe because of gay marriage, I was just using an example.
I could easily list things that make me feel unsafe. Does that mean everything that I feel unsafe for should be banned?
Also, if me owning a gun makes you feel unsafe, you're the wimp. You're already an idiot if you're actually using that ridiculous arguement for gun control. Most leftist have more sense than that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Most gun owners are white, middle aged, males who usually live in rural places. (There's a study on this from Harvard, but I'm too busy to look it up)
Now, with that in mind, in what world doesn't self defense classes help? In what world doesn't a parent escort a 12 yr old girl or at least have good friends to take care of them?
You need a gun to protect yourself? Chances are they are owned by a white, middle-aged, males. You have a home invader? Use a bat. You want to go hunting? Use an actual hunting weapon. (I hear bows are much more fun)
Sweden got away with gun control, so did Britain. Were there anymore rapes, murders, and thefts? Actually murders went down while the percentage of thefts was the same as the US. In fact even rapes dropped slightly from 32% to around 25%.
Though you want more guns? I'm sure Hitler would agree with you. Why not? He did lift the League of Nations gun ban in 1930.
π: 0 β©: 1
Self defense classes are helpful, but they don't magically turn you into chuck norris. For one, it takes years before you get good enough to handle yourself in a fight. And let's be real, it someone is much bigger than you, you'd need to be pretty well trained. I'm not saying the big guy always wins, which isn't true. But you seem to be putting a lot of faith into mainstream society to expect everyone to do martial arts and and be good at it.
And I guess, in every situation where a 12 yr old was raped it was obviously her fault or the parents. THEre's no situation where something like that would happen and it wouldn't be the parents fault. Like I guess if a 12 yr old is home alone and someone breaks in then it's the parents fault. The parent should've not gone to thier important buisness meeting.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=838Iy0β¦
HEre's a situation where guns helped. THis girl would probably be DEAD if it weren't for guns.
"Chances are they are owned by a white, middle-aged, males" Oh, really. Last time I went to Compton or Chicago, all I saw was white, middle-aged males. That's the demographic for LEGAL gun owners. And guess what? Legal gun owners don't usually break into peoples homes. Why am I worried about legal gun owners. Illegal guns are usually owned by criminals and gang members which happen to usually not be white middle aged men. Illegal guns are the problem, those are the guns where most crimes are commited by.
And yes... I'm gonna go up to an armed robber with a bat giving him all the time in the world to shoot me. And no, gun control will not stop the robber from getting a gun illegally. And I can hunt with whatever the hell I want to. I'm not getting rid of my possessions to make you feel safe, when in all reality you are in no danger by me having a gun.
And more women are buying guns than ever before, espcially since they need them the most. The reason why women used to not do it was because gun ownership was traditionally a masculine thnig. Now women are realizing, "Hey, guns are good and helpful" and now are becoming more popular among women.
Sweden and Britain don't count. Those countries have a vastly different socio-political climate. Czech Republic, Switzerland, and Finland allow a lot of gun ownership. They aren't as linient as the US, but they let people have a lot of guns, some of them allow semi-auto rifles. I think Finland actually lets people have full-auto guns. And many of them allow for concealed carry. And they don't have sky high crime rates like America. Why?
Maybe, just maybe, crime is the result of complex sociopolitical issues and poverty and doesn't have shit to do with gun ownership? Maybe the gun control is totally innefective and crime happens because of the bad cultural issues in this country? Chicago has some pretty bad gun laws and are really ristrictive of gun ownership, while Texas let's you own just about anything. Maybe drugs, gangs, and poverty are the cause for Chicagos high murder rate. That's why it's like a war zone over there. Guns are all over the place.
Why is that. How come there are so many Ak's and handguns overthere? Because if you think the government can effectively stop people from illegally getting guns you're are sadly mistaken. By banning them, you just insure that law abiding citizens can't get them.
π: 0 β©: 1
Great, a youtube link! It must be educational if it was provided from a site, /Anyone can use/.
Sure different socio-political atmosphere. Even though Britain is a mirror culture of the United States, minus the guns of course.
And do you know that those countries you listed have heavy regulation on their firearms? Oh yes, yes! In fact they only allow someone to use a gun if they can pass a mental exam, take gun safety courses in preparation of firearm readiness, and submit to regulations on firearms and check ups on their weapons.Β
And you honestly think women are buying more guns than men? Wrong again.
www.statisticbrain.com/gun-ownβ¦
In fact these demographics take into account illegal weapons confiscated by Federal and Local law enforcement. So those militia members who want to shoot up a cop? They are in this account.
And you can prevent the theft of guns, just lock up your damn rifle or just don't have one. In fact the mother of the murder of the children in Sandy Hook didn't lock up her guns, had a mentally deranged son in the house, and was a legal gun owner. Gee, that was smart.
Now why does our country have more rapes than any other country in the world?Β
Could it be our highly sexualized atmosphere? Nope.
Could it be our dominate males? Possibly.
Could it be the wealth inequality? Bingo!
If you didn't realize, in bad economic times, crime rates do rise. It's because of the idea of escapism, were a person wants to get away from their problems by creating new ones. This is where gun crimes and rapes come into account.Β
Now I'm ranting a bit, mostly because I don't have time for your shit, but I hope you perform some actual research on firearms.
A firearm is designed to kill, you can't get around that. We don't need guns, we need smart people. Simple as that.
π: 0 β©: 1
"Great, a youtube link! It must be educational if it was provided from a site, /Anyone can use/."
Does that make the situation of a girl needing to defend herself any less compelling? It was a news clip, who cares what site it's from
"Britain is a mirror culture of the United States, minus the guns of course."
For one, that's complete bullshit. If I were British, I'd be pissed. And you can own guns, it's just more of a pain in the ass than it is over here.
"they only allow someone to use a gun if they can pass a mental exam, take gun safety courses in preparation of firearm readiness, and submit to regulations on firearms and check ups on their weapons. "
I'm not against that. That's no different from the United States. I'm not an idiot. I don't want anybody to get a gun. I actually disagree with the NRA on background checks. I think they're good. I don't agree with high standards, but I think they should be done. When I say high standard
"And you honestly think women are buying more guns than men? Wrong again."
I said more women were buying them than ever before. Not that they are buying them more than men. There are more pistol packing babes than there were in the 1940s
"And you can prevent the theft of guns, just lock up your damn rifle or just don't have one."
That's not normally how criminals get guns. Usually they buy them off the black market. People breaking in and stealing guns isn't that much of a problem. Most crimes occur with black market weapons.
"Now why does our country have more rapes than any other country in the world? "
I'm pretty sure it doesn't have shit to do with guns.
"If you didn't realize, in bad economic times, crime rates do rise."
The point is that the gun crime your talking about has NOTHING to do with people going out and legally getting guns. Your gun control isn't getting the guns that are killing people. We need to crack down on the black market, not punish regular gun owners
I think that the country has a duty to get guns away from people that don't need them. But taking them away from responsible people isn't helping.
π: 0 β©: 0
Exactly the kind of thing i was trying to portray. Yours is drawn with more attention to detail than mine, hehe.
π: 0 β©: 0
I think that this sums up the situation pretty well.
π: 0 β©: 0
I was Christian, but after seeing what Christians do to everyone, I feel more comfortable identifying as Agnostic Theist
I've heard stories of people getting kicked out of their own house by their parents for supporting gay marriage, not even being gay themselves.
π: 0 β©: 1
"I've heard stories of people getting kicked out of their own house by their parents forΒ supportingΒ gay marriage, not even being gay themselves."
That's seriously a thing!?
π: 0 β©: 0
Please stop spamming me. Seriously.
π: 0 β©: 1
Out of curiosity, who was the person that was spamming you?
π: 0 β©: 0
I DON'T LIKE OF SOME CHRISTIAN, THEY DON'T RESPECT OTHER GODS. I WILL NOT RESPECT THEY IF THE DON'T RESPECT OUR OPINIONS.
π: 0 β©: 0
They're angry they are losing privileges, because they confused privilege with rights.
π: 0 β©: 0
Haha, nice. Have you also seen this one? [link]
π: 0 β©: 2
| Next =>