HOME | DD

Nekromanda — Stamp: Why Yes

Published: 2012-07-01 03:37:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 1432; Favourites: 55; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description I'll be honest, this is pretty much just a response stamp to a similarly titled stamp that says "Fuck Obamacare." This one:


There are a few faults with it, including the fact that several people who wanted it voted through in the first place hadn't even read it before they started selling it, but there are a few bonuses that I think are at least a step in the right direction. Plus, I know someone whose daughter was born with a preexisting heart condition - if it weren't for Obamacare's requirement for insurance companies to offer coverage to children with preexisting conditions, well... I don't want to think of what position that family might be in.
Related Stamps that you should go favorite immediately!

Obamacare in Simple Terms


BG: [link]
Temp: [link]


Click here for ALL of my Stamps
Click here for Religious Stamps
Click here for Political Stamps
Related content
Comments: 103

Morgue-Awall In reply to ??? [2012-07-06 23:11:10 +0000 UTC]

Maybe you should read it for yourself instead of scraping at second-hand information.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-07 01:05:54 +0000 UTC]

You are a little late to the party aren't you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgue-Awall In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-07 03:56:34 +0000 UTC]

I'd hardly think that less than a week on something that's been immortalized by being on the internet is "late", but if you want to put it that way, sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-07 04:01:45 +0000 UTC]

Well considering you didn't look at the other comments. One pointed out a site where I could read the whole bill for myself and I've been doing it. :/

There is one that even summarizes the information, and I have been taking a look at it, and it's citations to the original bill.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgue-Awall In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-07 19:28:19 +0000 UTC]

I have no obligation to read every single comment and reply. Sorry that I have better things to do.
A simple startpage.com search could've gotten you that, in all honesty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-08 01:33:22 +0000 UTC]

You have better things to do, but stopped to reply to me? You couldn't actually take two more seconds to see that this message had been replied to? I mean the replies to my comment are right under this comment. Are you telling me you couldn't see that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgue-Awall In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-08 19:57:21 +0000 UTC]

I read up to the point where it cut off. Derp.
And yes, yes I did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-08 20:45:58 +0000 UTC]

It would have taken a few more seconds to check the next page. Derp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgue-Awall In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-10 02:50:10 +0000 UTC]

When I had already spent long enough on it. Herp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-10 04:20:34 +0000 UTC]

Well if you don't want to spend the time to look then don't waste you time here. ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgue-Awall In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-10 16:27:54 +0000 UTC]

Preeetty sure I can spend my time as I want.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-10 17:43:44 +0000 UTC]

Well then don't complain about a waste of time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgue-Awall In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-11 19:08:36 +0000 UTC]

Preeetty sure I can complain about what I want.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Morgue-Awall [2012-07-11 23:27:45 +0000 UTC]

Okay. If you want.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Daemonic-Fae In reply to ??? [2012-07-02 03:44:40 +0000 UTC]

Whoever said that either didn't read it or was trying to stir paranoia.

IMO, the most ridiculous part was putting an additional 10% tax on tanning salons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Daemonic-Fae [2012-07-02 03:56:56 +0000 UTC]

Why? They are hazardous to the health and we tax the crap out of cigarettes which are also hazardous to health. Not to mention people have even though about putting taxes on things like soda. Which doesn't seem too far fetched. As much as I like soda it is very bad for you. Though not as hazardous as tanning or cigarettes. :/ That tax seems reasonable if the tax money is used to be put back into the health care system. Since some of those tanners will need to be taken care of.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Daemonic-Fae In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-02 04:58:44 +0000 UTC]

It does seem reasonable but it isn't exactly related to the rest of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to Daemonic-Fae [2012-07-02 05:04:19 +0000 UTC]

I guess not, but hey yah know? It doesn't seem to be anything too horrible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Daemonic-Fae In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-02 05:52:13 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it's less than a luxury tax.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MercuryShine In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-02 04:26:55 +0000 UTC]

The problem with putting an additional tax on soda is that it doesn't make healthier alternatives cheaper. A lot of problems with health and obesity are based off poverty, and the fact that unhealthier foods are cheaper and more available.

I have no problem with putting taxes on things like cigarettes and tanning beds, which are elective and not essential for survival. Food and drink, however, are not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to MercuryShine [2012-07-02 05:07:13 +0000 UTC]

You know? You are right. We should really lower the cost of FRESH healthy food. (and healthier food in general) Though, I'm tired of getting my stuff from a can just because it is cheaper. In fact canning it by today's methods makes it unhealthy for a lot of people. :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MercuryShine In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-02 05:33:30 +0000 UTC]

Really? What about modern canning is bad? Not arguing, legitimately curious now.

I buy frozen because it doesn't have a metallic after taste and isn't odd textured, and it's cheaper than canned here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to MercuryShine [2012-07-02 05:59:01 +0000 UTC]

I'm just curious. Have you took a look at the ingredients in canned products? They are horrible. Especially for fruit. Ugh canned fruit makes me sick. My dad told me when they canned things they didn't put near as many preservatives in it unless it was meat. What was used then was salt and not all this extra junk. I swear it is horrible. Of course I could be wrong. However canned will never beat fresh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MercuryShine In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 22:47:37 +0000 UTC]

Nothing about gardens. Here's the whole bill explained in simple english though. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to MercuryShine [2012-07-02 03:57:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for that. I looked at that and it was very informative. I think I shall save this for later.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DionRainsmith In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 14:35:36 +0000 UTC]

Just think about it. What does keeping a garden have ANYTHING to do with health care?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to DionRainsmith [2012-07-01 17:55:36 +0000 UTC]

I don't know. They said it was in there. So I was wondering if anyone else noticed it. Does anyone know where I can read the whole bill myself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SpeakThroughFingers In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-01 19:11:14 +0000 UTC]

Idk, but I highly doubt that's in there... That would make no sense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cr1kk3t In reply to SpeakThroughFingers [2012-07-01 21:01:49 +0000 UTC]

I do too, but I wanna know if it is or isn't. :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to Cr1kk3t [2012-07-02 00:27:12 +0000 UTC]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ayame18 In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 05:33:54 +0000 UTC]

I'm still looking into what his healthcare provides and other important information, but I still wonder why a few people protesting it dislike it so much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supyloco In reply to ayame18 [2012-07-03 05:09:40 +0000 UTC]

Because the people who started the yelling were a bunch of corporatists. Which is weird since they benefit a lot from this bill since there is no government option. Just private.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ayame18 In reply to Supyloco [2012-07-07 08:01:54 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay. Doesn't make sense at all with the fuss about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supyloco In reply to ayame18 [2012-07-07 19:46:52 +0000 UTC]

Like I said. These people have been brainwashed into hating any health care reform.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ayame18 In reply to Supyloco [2012-07-10 13:30:18 +0000 UTC]

I see, it's really sad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Inemiset In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 05:22:37 +0000 UTC]

It's all just a political game. Obamacare is not as a bad thing as Republicans make it out to be. Politicians just love to bicker and hate on each other, no matter how pitiful the reasoning, if there is any at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Supyloco In reply to Inemiset [2012-07-03 05:10:03 +0000 UTC]

I do believe it should be improved later on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inemiset In reply to Supyloco [2012-07-03 14:33:50 +0000 UTC]

Sure, improvement never hurts
But people need to put their hatred aside and work together for the good of the country, it's getting ridiculous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Supyloco In reply to Inemiset [2012-07-03 23:12:02 +0000 UTC]

Yes true. I think ObamaCare has potential but it needs tweeks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nekromanda In reply to Inemiset [2012-07-01 05:23:25 +0000 UTC]

Haha, yes that's true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AtheosEmanon In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 03:40:03 +0000 UTC]

[link]

Check my new stamp, about Obamacare..well how the Republicans are once again trying to tie universal health care to Hitler even though Germany got universal health care 50 years before Hitler came into power and six years before Hitler was even born.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to AtheosEmanon [2012-07-01 03:42:17 +0000 UTC]

Haha - that's awesome! Do you mind if I link to it here? I've always wondered, what's the right's fascination with nazis anyway? O.o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AtheosEmanon In reply to Nekromanda [2012-07-01 03:51:06 +0000 UTC]

Lmao, genocide!!!! Even though more died under Stalin than Hitler, and more died under Mao than Hitler and Stalin combined hm so perhaps I need a new theory .. hm haha I would be honored if you linked it there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to AtheosEmanon [2012-07-01 04:15:59 +0000 UTC]

Genocide? I love that stuff! But seriously, it's interesting how much of history people are willing to ignore. We should totally make a history book, but made of deviantart stamps. That would be epic.

Yay, thanks for the o.k. on linking your stamp - it makes a good point!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AtheosEmanon In reply to Nekromanda [2012-07-01 04:17:34 +0000 UTC]

deviancy is against the bible!!! they will call it Liberal bible of Deviant creation!!!! .. hm that has a nice ring to it! hahah

..no problem about linking

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to AtheosEmanon [2012-07-01 04:20:42 +0000 UTC]

Haha XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cocoluver12 In reply to ??? [2012-07-01 03:39:26 +0000 UTC]

? i dun get it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to cocoluver12 [2012-07-01 04:11:11 +0000 UTC]

Which part? Just confused what you mean.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cocoluver12 In reply to Nekromanda [2012-07-01 04:15:38 +0000 UTC]

everything what are you talking about? is it negative

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to cocoluver12 [2012-07-01 04:19:51 +0000 UTC]

In general I'm in support of Obamacare, so no what I'm saying is not completely negative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>