HOME | DD

#fanart #sadness #insideout
Published: 2015-11-01 17:14:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 165824; Favourites: 7111; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
FanArt : SADNESS from Inside OutRelated content
Comments: 677
Kternae In reply to ??? [2015-11-04 04:07:52 +0000 UTC]
i love this so much its so pretty :0 i love the skin especially! (dunno if you reply to things often but what program do you use? is there a faq?)
π: 0 β©: 0
ShiroyashaArata In reply to ??? [2015-11-04 00:52:02 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely stunning work as always~Β
π: 0 β©: 0
YuElai In reply to ??? [2015-11-04 00:41:40 +0000 UTC]
You should have at least called it "Sadness' big sister", cause really that she's blue doesn't make her to Sadness. I like the art but I hate the interpretation and the fact you called it "Sadness".
π: 0 β©: 0
SuperNintenbro In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 22:58:05 +0000 UTC]
okay so you enjoy drawing females or you just normally draw them
i don't blame you i draw males mostlyΒ
but can you please maybe sexualize other characters from shows/movies that are for adults/teens
just imagine some kid searching up "inside out fanart" and finding this
π: 0 β©: 1
ZakSketch In reply to SuperNintenbro [2015-11-04 00:56:32 +0000 UTC]
This is Deviantart. The artist has the freedom to draw whatever he wants as long as it doesn't go against the guidelines and I don't see anything wrong with this fanart. The Internet is huge and there are bound to have sexual content so It's obvious that it's the kid that has to be supervised when browsing the web.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
SuperNintenbro In reply to ZakSketch [2015-11-04 01:57:40 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't forcing them to not draw or saying anything was wrong with this i was just asking them to draw other stuff but if they choose not to that's what they choose to do i won't stop them.
π: 0 β©: 0
BobbiBrown12345 In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 22:37:29 +0000 UTC]
OK then. This is a thing. I have nothing wrong with this. Even if I did, ok then. I disagree with the subject, but will praise the work anyways because of how long it probably took to create it. I have seen a thing, it's a well made thing, I'll move on. That's that. No need to over-react people.
π: 0 β©: 0
Astera28 In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 22:31:09 +0000 UTC]
R U SERIOUS!?
Out of all the other characters in the world that you could have made a pin-up of you decide to use one from a Disney movie for families and kids!
Kids love that movie and enjoy seeing the characters!
The way you painted it shows that you obviously have skill and the talent needed to draw something like this but,
this is just sick dude
Seriously sick,
and not in a good way
π: 0 β©: 3
KaylaKedziora In reply to Astera28 [2015-11-04 16:22:29 +0000 UTC]
why dose it mater if its a kids movie? it's just art i've seen awful fetish Β art. this is nothingΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
RanaElaseim In reply to Astera28 [2015-11-03 23:00:32 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, most of the Disney princesses are big boobed, perfect body shaped sex symbols without anyone's help. You think Ariel isn't a perfect pin-up girl as is? There's nothing sick about this. It's his style. As cookie-cutter as his style is, he's damn good at it, and unless you want to rant about every old-school Disney princess being a sexualized idol, then you don't have an argument to stand on.
π: 0 β©: 0
jaydeite In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 21:16:05 +0000 UTC]
why are u sexualizing an emotion...
π: 0 β©: 2
jaydeite In reply to Rassilon001 [2015-11-04 08:34:59 +0000 UTC]
Doesn't make it any less gross
π: 0 β©: 1
KaylaKedziora In reply to jaydeite [2015-11-04 16:23:56 +0000 UTC]
its a drawing who cares everyone sexalises everything this is no exception, there's Β no point in complaining.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
jaydeite In reply to KaylaKedziora [2015-11-04 19:44:57 +0000 UTC]
just because everyone does it doesnt mean its alright..
also take into consideration that along with riley sadness is 12 so this is pedophilic too
π: 0 β©: 1
DerDracheRitter In reply to jaydeite [2015-11-05 06:14:36 +0000 UTC]
You do realize that you're going off the base character right? The character herself is 12, however the drawing clearly shows accelerated aging. Had he drawn her in this pose with a twelve year olds body type then it would be pedophilic. But as you can CLEARLY. SEE. she has the body of a 18+ year old. Therefore, not pedophilic.
Jackass.
π: 0 β©: 1
jaydeite In reply to DerDracheRitter [2015-11-05 07:30:07 +0000 UTC]
"Jackass" wow im triggered > : ((
ageing up a character doesnt make anything better though
like.. this is mainly just my opinion but ageing up a character to draw sexualized drawings of them just shows youre attracted to a child but dont wanna get in trouble for drawing child porn lmao
its not any better because youre still attracted to a child in canon in the end
π: 0 β©: 0
Niemamkota In reply to jaydeite [2015-11-03 22:25:43 +0000 UTC]
with great sadness comes great... bosom?
π: 0 β©: 3
Rassilon001 In reply to Niemamkota [2015-11-04 08:01:15 +0000 UTC]
This way she can offer a... place... to cry on.
π: 0 β©: 1
DerDracheRitter In reply to Rassilon001 [2015-11-05 06:15:30 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha, your comment made me bust a gut.
π: 0 β©: 0
Do0dleBug In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 20:07:49 +0000 UTC]
The coloring on this is amazing! Awesome work.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
JJoseph In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 19:52:49 +0000 UTC]
There's a fair chance someone else thought of this, but maybe she's sad because she doesn't own a decent pair of pants?
On that note, looking great as always.
π: 0 β©: 0
MAX1M1L1AN In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 19:02:48 +0000 UTC]
Sure looks sad Oops
Anyways great art tho!
π: 0 β©: 0
ZeGoldenRabbit In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 17:58:55 +0000 UTC]
It's a great drawing and I love the coloring.
But I just can't see the character herself in this...Β
Maybe a girl cosplaying Sadness but not herself.
But still it looks really great beside that.
π: 0 β©: 0
AngrySwadloon In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 14:39:00 +0000 UTC]
People are upset over an emotion that has taken on a physical form? Β An emotion.
π: 0 β©: 0
StickFigureALLDAY In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 13:29:10 +0000 UTC]
You have a beautiful mind lol
π: 0 β©: 0
Nobu-Nobuo In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 12:54:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh glub!! this is so hot and amazing, and sad, and hot, and a lot of other suff that include hot in the middle XD this is just great, if you plan to make a series of the other emotions I can't wait to see the rest, if not then you should really think about making it, just this one it's amazingΒ Β
π: 0 β©: 0
mixjestiic In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 10:07:44 +0000 UTC]
Screw haters, this looks 2beautiful4me
π: 0 β©: 0
SuperNintenbro In reply to Batman0910 [2015-11-03 22:59:19 +0000 UTC]
this fucking comment omfg
π: 0 β©: 0
BlissChild1 In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 03:34:48 +0000 UTC]
i thought this was velma but blue lol still pretty awesome
π: 0 β©: 0
Totem-Spirit In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 03:26:12 +0000 UTC]
I think we're all being a little immature about this shit. The art is amazing: great color, beautiful shading, amazing texture, etc. You can't shit on that just because it's ridiculously sexualized.
And then, the people who think this is bad or innaproptiate, are just as right as the people who think it's perfectly fine. They could easily argue that this artist is very limited on anatomy and body
types (fuck, even gender). Those are very key elements of art.
You could also argue that this is what people expect him the put out. Do you think his watchers, who watch him for drawing hot characters, want to see him draw a depressed sexually unattractive character?
Hell no. My watchers on FA don't watch me for fanart porn, they watch me more based on stuff like this (This is my art, so don't click it if u don't want to see)
I draw very random, varied characters of very different species (by no means am I a sfw artist though, I'm not claiming Virgin Mary on this shit) and race. Basically, every artist has his or her own
fan base, and he or she is going to post what the watchers came for on average (or are going to continue what they did in the first place)
You can't win this kind of argument, because both sides have very good opinions.
π: 0 β©: 1
ApertureKills In reply to Totem-Spirit [2015-11-03 04:41:27 +0000 UTC]
That's like all this person's art is tho.
I look in their "more" and all I see is bewbs.
Β
π: 0 β©: 2
Totem-Spirit In reply to ApertureKills [2015-11-03 22:34:25 +0000 UTC]
Well they are also from Thailand on a worldwide website known for having non-traditional (not the medium) art.
π: 0 β©: 0
The-British-Teacup In reply to ApertureKills [2015-11-03 04:46:42 +0000 UTC]
That's a very narrow minded way of thinking though. The detail on the hair is amazing, the color scheme is beautiful, the texture on the clothes is very nice. etc. There are many things in this drawing aside from the body structure of the girl.
Also, so what if there are boobs? Do we have to draw every female character with a flat chest?Β
π: 0 β©: 2
ApertureKills In reply to The-British-Teacup [2015-11-15 08:29:25 +0000 UTC]
Get outta here you mindless SJW. I never said I didn't appreciate it, nor did I say anything about variety in character figure. Literally all I stated was my observation that this artist draws a lot of boobs.
Seriously, some people. What.
π: 0 β©: 0
Vampian In reply to The-British-Teacup [2015-11-03 06:53:46 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
The-British-Teacup In reply to Vampian [2015-11-03 06:59:22 +0000 UTC]
I was replying to ApertureKills.
I repeated what the original said because s/he apparently didn't see it the first time.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>