HOME | DD

#fanart #sadness #insideout
Published: 2015-11-01 17:14:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 165828; Favourites: 7111; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
FanArt : SADNESS from Inside OutRelated content
Comments: 677
Vampian In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 07:12:07 +0000 UTC]
Ahh, my bad. I got used to Youtube's format where it's less obvious who replies to who, and I forgot that each reply moves to the right. :<
π: 0 β©: 0
TheCytox In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 02:57:13 +0000 UTC]
Personally not a fan of the whole "Sexyness" of saddness, But have to say this is stunning!
π: 0 β©: 0
QuietStealth In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 01:51:37 +0000 UTC]
No one cares if you're offended that she's skinny. It's called artistic liberty.
Cry more about it and maybe you'll get every single piece of art taken down that doesn't cater to your overly-sensitive attitude.
Oh wait, no that's not gonna happen. HAHA!
π: 0 β©: 2
nneptune84 In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 21:09:02 +0000 UTC]
nonskinny characters are so rarely visible in media (and i mean REAL ones, not parody characters that serve as the butt of fat jokes.) that it's ridiculous to take away the few characters with that representation and force them into that "acceptable body types" bubble.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuietStealth In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-03 21:35:17 +0000 UTC]
It doesn't force them. That's bullshit. If they feel that way that's their fault. Its not Society's fault people feel that way and you shouldn't try to bully people and harass artist because they want to draw skinny/sexy girls.
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 21:38:26 +0000 UTC]
i don't support bullying or harrassment though, sorry if it came off that way.
i just don't think it's okay to assume that ONLY skinny or a tiny bit chubby girls are sexy and attractive. it hurts people who are bigger, because they assume that they are unattractive or unlovable. and i understand that it's his preference or style, but in that case he shouldn't have drawn a character outside of his own personal tastes and forced her into that when she isn't.
again, sorry for coming off rudely, and i hope this makes sense!!!
π: 0 β©: 2
Buniis In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-06 03:17:52 +0000 UTC]
Drawing a character who is supposed to be chubby, skinny and sexualized is not erasing the fact that the character herself is chubby. I'm large and no, I don't feel unloved or unattractive. That seems silly to get so wrapped up in one's own insecurity over some fanart, to me. People can draw what they want and if others don't like it, then that's their own personal problem.
π: 0 β©: 0
QuietStealth In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-03 21:41:11 +0000 UTC]
No. He's given the choice to. If he wants to draw her that way he has no responsibility over how people feel about it. The responsibility relies on the people who feel that way.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 21:45:57 +0000 UTC]
i mean it's not like i'm saying he's not ALLOWED to draw bigger characters, but it would be nice if he learned HOW to draw them instead of making them thinner.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuietStealth In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-03 21:48:54 +0000 UTC]
He has draw and painted a fat character once. I agree, he should learn how to draw overweight people. But he has learned. I checked through his gallery and he's draw a fat character before.
Maybe he personally doesn't like drawing them and doesn't find them attractive. But it really doesn't matter, I think he should draw what makes him happy.
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 21:54:58 +0000 UTC]
exactly, he shouldn't draw what makes him unhappy. which is why he shouldn't have drawn an overweight character if he didn't want to, but if he DID he could've at least drawn her the way she is. people drawing things in their style and taking artistic liberty is fine, but not when it completely erases something that is Β barely ever represented in media as is.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuietStealth In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-03 22:02:42 +0000 UTC]
I see what you mean. I agree. I would've helped him learn more about drawing overweight people, but he/she didn't want to draw that. But I disagree that it takes other people's identities.
If that person wants to make a statement and show their beautiful side of overweight people, they should learn to draw themselves' and show their story. Not complain and tell everyone else to cater to them.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 22:18:43 +0000 UTC]
some voices need help being heard because they are too quiet on their own.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuietStealth In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-03 22:35:23 +0000 UTC]
To be fair, I can see your point. You want everyone to be equal in appeal to appearance? That's for society to decide.
You can't force it or else you'll just end up making everyone turn against you. But most people don't find attraction in the overweight. It sucks but it happens. Some people are mean about it some people aren't.Β
Those offended by it shouldn't worry about what other people think, in my opinion. Not say you can just change that way of thinking, I can imagine it's hard, but they have to or else they'll suffer depression and start blaming everyone else and that's even more toxic because not only does it hurt them, it hurts everyone else.
See what I mean? I'm not that good at explaining stuff.
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 22:43:09 +0000 UTC]
Β this isnt sarcastic btw
π: 0 β©: 0
RanaElaseim In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 04:51:44 +0000 UTC]
Sounds like you're just as overly sensitive that people have an opinion that differs from yours.
It's a beautiful piece of artwork, certainly. From a art critique standpoint, however, it's disappointing. This was a great opportunity for this artist to attempt something different; draw a fat chick to look sexy and gorgeous. He chose to make her skinny, and thereby made this piece look like a cookie cutter, typical piece like the rest of his/her gallery, with no ambition beyond what gets him/her views and likes. And don't get me wrong, I favorited it, too, as an individual piece. Against the rest of his/her gallery, though, it's bland and typical. The choice of how he/she is using artistic liberty is boring.
π: 0 β©: 2
QuietStealth In reply to RanaElaseim [2015-11-03 10:35:27 +0000 UTC]
Boring TO YOU. The reason I'm insulting the overly sensitive to this picture is because they deem it necessary to harass and call the artist "sick" and "a terrible human being", something typical of the social justice crowd... you know, because they're all like in highschool and think they know everything because they suck on the massive landwhale tits of the social justice propaganda machine. Also "beautifully fat" is subjective. Not all people find fat people attractive. That and I want to hear SJWs cry and sling their buzzwords around in a fit of retardation spasms in attempts of trying to insult me. But speaking of which, yeah. The artist knows how to draw fat:Β neoartcore.deviantart.com/art/β¦
"YOU FATSHAMING PIECE OF SHIT I HATE YOU" is not a differing opinion. If you think that's a valid opinion/criticism, you're a dipshit.
π: 0 β©: 1
RanaElaseim In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-03 23:20:39 +0000 UTC]
Ah, see if your purpose is just to troll then TROLL ON, MOTHERFUCKER! (no sarcasm intended) Couldn't give a shit about fat shaming nonsense. My comment is purely from an artistic critique standpoint.
From your other thread: "He has draw and painted a fat character once. I agree, he should learn how to draw overweight people. But he has learned. I checked through his gallery and he's draw a fat character before.
Maybe he personally doesn't like drawing them and doesn't find them attractive. But it really doesn't matter, I think he should draw what makes him happy."
To your point about drawing what he's happy drawing, I agree. My point is that, as a past artist myself, you sometimes hit a peak of talent and stop progressing in your abilities. Some people become content with this, and some get discouraged by it. That is what I see here, a peak of artistic progress, and I personally feel he could keep going and do even greater pieces if he took opportunities like this to try new styles. Your example is a 'fat' thing, but not a heavyset person. It's also 3 years old. So to me, it's not that valid of an example.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuietStealth In reply to RanaElaseim [2015-11-03 23:28:12 +0000 UTC]
I'm shocked. Most of the people are here saying it's fatshaming. I thought you were mad because hurr durr "this fat shames".
No, I agree. It does look cookie cutter, but I like it. He could've done a chubbier girl, but he chose not to. Who cares.
π: 0 β©: 1
RanaElaseim In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-04 00:26:24 +0000 UTC]
ROFL By your response, I figured as much. And like I said, I favorited the pic as well. It's just my personality when it comes to critiquing his choice. Many of my friends are artists, and I'm more the art critic, lol.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuietStealth In reply to RanaElaseim [2015-11-04 00:28:10 +0000 UTC]
It's all good man. Sorry about the misunderstanding.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
RanaElaseim In reply to QuietStealth [2015-11-04 00:39:24 +0000 UTC]
lol Naw, you're all good, dude. BTW, love your gallery. Cool Miss Color character.
π: 0 β©: 1
hyrulestorm97 In reply to RanaElaseim [2015-11-03 07:52:15 +0000 UTC]
Or you know...maybe he just doesn't like drawing fat chicks.
"The choice of how he/she is using artistic liberty is boring." I only seems to be boring towards people like you because "muh fat chicks"
π: 0 β©: 1
RanaElaseim In reply to hyrulestorm97 [2015-11-03 23:06:53 +0000 UTC]
It's boring to me because he doesn't make an attempt to draw anything other than socially assumed sexy chicks. Nothing wrong with that choice of specialty, mind you. I personally found it disappointing he didn't attempt something different given this opportunity. His choice, his art, just disappointing as a viewer. If the subject matter had been, say, Vanellope, a little adorable girl princess, and he made her into his typical sexy style, I'd have the same reaction. As an artist, it looks like he's hit a wall in artistic progress, that's all.
π: 0 β©: 0
Miss-Jeanni In reply to liamcolt [2015-11-03 01:35:41 +0000 UTC]
*character. Also why is it ruined? I don't see anything wrong with it. Maybe you're the one with the sick mind?
π: 0 β©: 2
Miss-Jeanni In reply to liamcolt [2016-02-01 21:37:41 +0000 UTC]
You're three months late.
π: 0 β©: 1
YuElai In reply to Miss-Jeanni [2015-11-03 14:27:57 +0000 UTC]
Well, that Sadness right here is highly sexualized. And yeah "aristic liberty" blah blah but this character isn't only extremely and unnecessarily sexualized but has a completely different body type. You can see that this isn't done for the sake of interpreting a character new and in an own style but about boobs and boobs only. And that's just sad and really really unnecessary. Now I haven't seen the movie but from what I've seen this movie is for younger people, "Sadness" is a young character and there's nothing and should be nothing sexy about her.
π: 0 β©: 4
Miss-Jeanni In reply to YuElai [2015-11-03 22:56:03 +0000 UTC]
Why is it unnecessary? Because the character in the movie wasn't sexy? But thats all based on an opinion, something humans made up. Its an opinion and nothing more. No facts. No right or wrong. Again, she's not sexualized here for me at all. I find other things "sexy" and some people could find this "sexy." All good. You ONLY find it "sexy" because thats the way you were taught and told and how your mind is now trained to think.
Anyway, not trying to attack you. My original comment was meant to show that its all opinions and honestly, the people who think this is sexy are the ones that make it sexy. Looking at different cultures show that.
π: 0 β©: 1
YuElai In reply to Miss-Jeanni [2015-11-04 00:38:27 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't saying that I think it's sexy, sexy is something else for me. I said that she's sexualized. And that's just the truth. That was the thinking of the artist here, you don't wanna disagree on that, do you? Now I'm not trying to mock his talent and I really really don't mind most of these "sexy girls" on Deviantart but this is not Sadness anymore. This is not an own interpretation of the character, this is a blue girl that looks completely different to the original character. To call it "Sadness" doesn't make it to Sadness. That's all I'm saying. It's good work but to call it Sadness is kindaΒ "kids character ruining".
π: 0 β©: 0
nneptune84 In reply to YuElai [2015-11-03 21:12:23 +0000 UTC]
and she's not even this thin
π: 0 β©: 0
Roberthaha In reply to YuElai [2015-11-03 16:19:13 +0000 UTC]
Because the human form is gross and boobs are gay.
π: 0 β©: 0
fietdapowah In reply to YuElai [2015-11-03 15:36:47 +0000 UTC]
Nicely done. I agree with you 100%.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sarbearart In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 00:02:38 +0000 UTC]
Its such a good drawing, but.......Sadness was so innocent!
Still love it though, but i feel like you should put your awesome talent into different characters! Like harley quinn.......
π: 0 β©: 0
Frappetau In reply to ??? [2015-11-02 22:55:44 +0000 UTC]
the only thing I dislike about this is that you avoid drawing a bigger character by just drawing huge boobs and ass, when the character herself actually has a large body type.
π: 0 β©: 2
nneptune84 In reply to Frappetau [2015-11-03 21:13:08 +0000 UTC]
people say "but artistic liburty !!! mah art style!!" and that's just a sad excuse to not learn how to draw different body types.
π: 0 β©: 1
DemonSing In reply to nneptune84 [2015-11-04 01:44:13 +0000 UTC]
nneptune84 Sad excuse to not learn how to draw different body types? Everyone has their own idea of beauty and it's not your right to intrude or force him on what he wants to draw. What, are you going to change the body types of mannequins because they offend you? I'd take his art over yours any day to be honest and do take offense.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to DemonSing [2015-11-04 02:59:49 +0000 UTC]
i'm not forcing him to do anything tho??? what
i'm not "offended" or anything, and what does MY art have to do with anything?
i'm not angry at this artwork and i do actually really like how he drew her face, i just happened to read the comments and i agree that yes, it would've been better if he at least drew her with her real body type, or just didn't draw her at all. his art usually sexualizes thinner female characters with large breasts, and if he doesn't want to draw a larger person he shouldn't have instead of MAKING them thin. but i'm not forcing him anything, he can do whatever he wants and i really couldn't care less.
again, i was just passing through deviantart. i didn't want to start shit, just giving my opinion on things going on in the comments.
π: 0 β©: 1
DemonSing In reply to nneptune84 [2016-02-19 13:21:30 +0000 UTC]
"Β it would've been better if he at least drew her with her real body type, or just didn't draw her at all. his art usually sexualizes thinner female characters with large breasts, and if he doesn't want to draw a larger person he shouldn't have instead of MAKING them thin. but i'm not forcing him anything, he can do whatever he wants and i really couldn't care less."
And? Art can be exaggerated. Is it really supposed to reflect reality? You claim to want more realistic body proportions on women, yet I don't see anyone helping the cause for men and their muscles in marvel comics and media. Nice double standard, rather I think men don't care as much being objectified like women are. For instance, I can gladly say I want to be as manly as a character from Jojo. Is it realistic within the proportions of anatomy and reality? No, rather it's up to a man or a woman to decide whether to objectify themselves to beauty standards at all. -Opinion is still trash-Β
π: 0 β©: 1
nneptune84 In reply to DemonSing [2016-02-19 13:24:07 +0000 UTC]
Where in my statement did i say i DIDN'T stand for men being portrayed realistically as well as women? Where did i say this at? Please, direct me to it, friend.
π: 0 β©: 0
anobouzu In reply to Frappetau [2015-11-03 00:08:19 +0000 UTC]
Considering this artist only seems to draw one type of female body, it makes me wonder wth possessed them to draw a character from a children's film..
π: 0 β©: 0
myxton In reply to ??? [2015-11-02 22:40:35 +0000 UTC]
Points for creativity.
To those who didn't like this artwork: Let people who enjoy it, enjoy it. Art isn't supposed to be politically correct or accurate in its representation. Art is the visual manifestation of imagination. Don't police imagination. If you don't agree with it, just let it go because there's enough hatred in this world. Don't be the reason for more.
π: 0 β©: 3
YuElai In reply to myxton [2015-11-03 14:31:48 +0000 UTC]
Hahah how is that creative? I'm sorry but his/her girls look all the same, all are oversexualised, there's nothing creative about it. Creative would it have been if s/he would have interpreted this character new but still true to the original character. This is not Sadness but a grown-up with blue skin and boobs.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
myxton In reply to YuElai [2015-11-03 19:24:59 +0000 UTC]
That's your opinion and your view. Mocking my opinion might make you feel good because where I see art, you see oversexualization and boobs. The skill required to draw and paint it, is a lot. Hating something is easier than creating it.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>