HOME | DD

NezumiYuki — R-Type and X-Type Luftschiff

Published: 2011-06-02 04:31:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 1788; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 76
Redirect to original
Description Here's a new art with a new model, this time an X-Type Lengthened Super Zeppelin along with a typical R-Type Super Zepp for size and style comparison.

I should point out however that I have not yet meshed up a more accurate fore-gondola or aft-gondola for my new X-Type, so for now I'm using my pre-existing component R-Type gondolas for this conceptual art piece which will be replaced at a later date with the more accurate gondolas.

Aside from sheer size difference, the other main differences with the X-type versus the earlier R-types is the omission of the outrigger gear boxes and strut mounted propellers that were driven by an additional 5th engine in the aft gondola. The X-Type's simpler six engine layout is much more efficient and powerful, otherwise the same outrigger wing propellers would have been used.

The X-Type according to [link] Puget sound Airship Society, the new X-Type lengthened Super Zeppelins were 211 meters in length... I have some re-modeling issues to sort out with my new X-Type so she's a little longer at 217 meters, but I'll soon have the proportions sorted out soon enough.

Anyhow back story goes that since the lengthened supers were born too late in the war, they did not have much air time, or much effect on the outcome of the war, and many of them including LZ114 were given off to the UK as war reparations. LZ114 was dismantled, and in all likely hood so were others before 114.

Ships before, such as LZ104 (Afrikaschiff) literally meaning Africa Ship, did see some service, indeed flying all the way from home station in Bulgaria to Eastern Africa, but upon news that Germany surrendered, she returned home, ultimately setting a long distance flight record for the time, but doing little else. She did participate in raids, like other ships, notably the R-Types, but LZ104 crashed while raiding Malta in 1918, but reasons for her downing are still a mystery.

Since these lengthened X-Types are late war period, they have been the inspiration for my early models of Zeppelins still seen in my gallery, many of them in particular being my Maximilian's Angst vor mitternacht. Now however with my much improved modeling skills in sketchup, I can revisit my old models just the same as I am doing with my hand drawn arts, and here is my first attempt to model a more accurate X-Type which will become the our real Mitternacht, and my own .....hmmm.... LZ-119?

*****

I built my new X-Type using the same R-Type L32 which I made earlier, and simply drafted in 6 more center rings to install two more gas cells in the now stretched hull. I slightly scaled down the length of the tail cone, and moved it aft along with the tail fins, and deleted the asymmetric sub-sized lower fin with a full sized upper, rotated around 180 and dropped in place.

The center slung engine gondolas were moved forward and a clone group was placed aft of them in an equal spacing. The outrigger pod propellers were deleted from the aft gondola, and so was the radiator and muffler that outwardly signified there was the 5th engine there. The rest of the conversion just fell into place. Only thing that had to be scratch made over, were the bracing wires to hold the gondolas and engine pods in place. And for now my X-Type is done. ^w^

A later tweak will have the flight and aft gondolas replaced with streamlined shapes, much like the bullet like gondola seen on the British R80 speed freak. And then my X will be complete.

***********

Super Zepp and Lengthened Super were build by :iconnezmiyuki: in versions 7 and 8
Related content
Comments: 25

LtJim [2011-07-06 04:02:55 +0000 UTC]

Nice job as always!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to LtJim [2011-07-06 09:27:33 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Lt.Jim! ^w^ These are pretty interesting machines to make. I can almost see them flying the skies of today if not for the terrible accidents that doomed their kind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caastel [2011-06-02 23:58:21 +0000 UTC]

very nice model

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to caastel [2011-06-03 00:21:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you caastel

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Necromancer [2011-06-02 07:28:18 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful models! Truly nice to see the two different classes next to each other. It gives a real sense of the scale and progress between the two designs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to The-Necromancer [2011-06-02 07:39:05 +0000 UTC]

Ah thank you Necromancer! ^w^

Should I find more useful information regarding the earlier designs, I would love to build a replica of the Count's early ships, like the Deutschland and Schwaben as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Necromancer In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 07:46:14 +0000 UTC]

What manner of information on the DELAG ships would you be looking for?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to The-Necromancer [2011-06-02 09:23:10 +0000 UTC]

Hmm right now I'm simply looking for a good profile shot of the Count's early ships. A simple photo of either Schwaben or Deutsch that does not have too much fish-eye or lensing so I can make some crude templates in which to flesh out a good hull with. ^ ^

I'll find something eventually, I just need some time to do the image search. ^ ^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Necromancer In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 19:25:47 +0000 UTC]

This may help you a bit:

[link]
[link]
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to The-Necromancer [2011-06-02 22:40:15 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Necromancer! The USA Today link was more perfect than I could have asked for! The multi-media vid has all that I need. ^w^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Necromancer In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 23:39:37 +0000 UTC]

Your most welcome! I figured that one would be most useful, as it is a simple render of the Schwaben with a 360 degree view.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to The-Necromancer [2011-06-02 23:56:49 +0000 UTC]

Thank you again good sir, it is MOST useful indeed! ^ ^ A good side view without much lens distortion is what many 3D modelers look for, and finding a good reference like this is pure gold!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MensjeDeZeemeermin [2011-06-02 04:42:47 +0000 UTC]

Shame they based _Shenandoah_ on the High-Altitude design, and not the 'cruising' design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to MensjeDeZeemeermin [2011-06-02 04:51:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, the American and English engineers didn't know any better, and besides the Germans were still bitter so they weren't about to point out to the victors that there were problems with the "height climber" which Zeppelin Reparation-1 Shenandoah was based on. Modern hindsight makes it quite obvious that all the extra weight reducing holes drilled in all the girders would also reduce strength, but this was space age stuff back then, so no one other than the Germans knew better about making copies of the X-Type... And Luftschiffbau Zeppelin were hoping to be a big part of national rebuilding after the war, so they weren't about to let their precious high tech secrets go.

As a result, poor clone copy Shenandoah folded up like a leaf in the storm. D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MensjeDeZeemeermin In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 05:00:15 +0000 UTC]

She was a beautiful ship, too. The survival of the forward section crew was a testament to training and resourcefulness. How wonderful it would have been if she'd made it to the North Pole and back.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NBbowler [2011-06-02 04:41:51 +0000 UTC]

Very nice blimps, Yuki!

And Yuki's blimps are very nice, too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to NBbowler [2011-06-02 04:52:10 +0000 UTC]

Why am I not surprised you would say that? Care for a ride? :wink:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NBbowler In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 05:34:02 +0000 UTC]

Yes, ma'am!

*huggles Yuki*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to NBbowler [2011-06-02 05:35:53 +0000 UTC]

*huggles back*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cyberboy7000 [2011-06-02 04:39:40 +0000 UTC]

Very nice models!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to Cyberboy7000 [2011-06-02 04:57:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Cyber! ^w^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cyberboy7000 In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 14:22:44 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

awash2002 [2011-06-02 04:33:44 +0000 UTC]

Now that is awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NezumiYuki In reply to awash2002 [2011-06-02 04:37:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you awash. ^ ^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

awash2002 In reply to NezumiYuki [2011-06-02 12:04:48 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0