HOME | DD

#originalphotographer #portraitphotogaphy #beautiful #beautifulgirl #beautifulwoman #beauty #bluehair #bluehairedgirl #girl #girlfriend #hair #hairstyle #photography #portrait #woman #beautifulwomanportrait #originalphotography
Published: 2016-03-09 21:38:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 705; Favourites: 26; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
Facebook | Etsy | Tumblr | 500pxRelated content
Comments: 11
DJ-Uni-Mekaju [2016-08-29 04:22:04 +0000 UTC]
Love the colors and vibe. That open field is glorious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Npm98 In reply to DJ-Uni-Mekaju [2016-08-29 19:39:29 +0000 UTC]
I spent much longer than I would like to admit getting the colors just right thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chrisryder123 [2016-06-29 20:28:13 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic. I love the bloom coming off of her hair :-D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GarethJason [2016-03-10 02:47:16 +0000 UTC]
Just a note, you should probably turn off the download button so that people dont try to copy your stuff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Npm98 In reply to GarethJason [2016-03-10 04:02:51 +0000 UTC]
It's a relatively low-res image, and the watermark is there, though it's reasonably easy to get rid of, either by cropping or clone stamping (I just did it myself both ways in less than 3 minutes, haha.)
Even at 150 dpi (Which is incredibly low for printing unless you're printing on a low-res medium, I.E Canvas) the best you'd get is MAYBE an 8x10 with noticeable quality degradation. I'm not concerned about people floating 5x7s around
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
EdibleShoes In reply to Npm98 [2016-03-13 18:49:35 +0000 UTC]
I had a chuckle because 150 is still a lil too high in my book - High quality is 300 dpi+ Internet resolution is 72 so I would think about 100 would be best.
How is it editing with Adobe CC- You have to pay a yearly/monthly fee right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Npm98 In reply to EdibleShoes [2016-03-14 04:59:02 +0000 UTC]
True true, but I have my default dpi when importing from Lightroom to Photoshop set to 150 because it makes for decent quality canvas prints. Improvements above 150 dpi with canvas are negligible, so that's where I keep it.
As for CC, it's nice - I find the UI is a bit more responsive over CS6 and there's a few additions like range masks, being able to bring 32 bit HDR images straight into Adobe Camera Raw from the HDR merge dialogue, and using Camera Raw as a filter (Using it as a smart filter is almost curing my cancer, haha) that really make the upgrade worth it. I feel like the resizing algorithms have gotten a bit better as well, since I would feel reasonably comfortable printing a 20x30 at 300 dpi (9000 x 6000 pixels) from an 18 megapixel shot (5184 x 3456 pixels), something I was uncomfortable doing in CS6... I'll have to test it one of these days, but the quality keeps itself together incredibly well on my computer monitor considering it's almost double the size of the original image.
As far as paying a monthly fee, I came up with a little firewall/XML edit workaround to get past it for CC programs so I'm not currently paying for it, but if I had a steady paycheck, I'd definitely say that $10 a month for Lightroom and Photoshop would not be unreasonable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GarethJason In reply to Npm98 [2016-03-10 07:04:18 +0000 UTC]
Ah okay, thats true. And hey maybe someone will make one their wallpaper. They are big enough for that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Npm98 In reply to GarethJason [2016-03-10 15:28:58 +0000 UTC]
I'd prefer somebody bought it and made it their literal wallpaper but ey that's cool too brug
👍: 0 ⏩: 1