HOME | DD
Published: 2008-04-16 05:07:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 5075; Favourites: 67; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Castorocauda lutrasimilis was a semi-aquatic early Mammal that lived during the Middle Jurassic of China. It measured about 40 cm. Its tail was broad and flattened like a modern day beaver and his forearms show adaptation for digging similar to a platypus. Dubbed as the "Jurassic beaver" by the press at the time of its discovery, Castorocauda is not related to beaver but belong to a group of primitive and extinct mesozoic mammals called Docodonts.Related content
Comments: 11
Persona22 [2015-02-25 18:21:01 +0000 UTC]
Aren't docodonts considered to beΒ Mammaliaformes? As in, not full fledged mammals but mammal shaped?
π: 1 β©: 1
NTamura In reply to Persona22 [2015-02-26 04:39:45 +0000 UTC]
Yes, they are mammaliaformes...
π: 1 β©: 0
vinhavatar [2012-08-12 13:43:43 +0000 UTC]
Looks like a good hunting target, judging by the fur!
π: 0 β©: 0
RedVioletPanda [2010-10-06 05:26:46 +0000 UTC]
Wow, it looks like a otter somewhat. I didn't realize that mammals in the Jurassic had fur like that, sorry if it sounds like a dumb question.
Good work on this, I especially like the lighting and effects in the water.
π: 0 β©: 1
NTamura In reply to RedVioletPanda [2010-10-11 00:07:47 +0000 UTC]
Mammals certainly had fur by that time. Eomaia for instance has been preserved with fur impressions...
π: 0 β©: 1
RoCueto [2010-10-03 02:59:45 +0000 UTC]
That thing looks adorable.
Very good underwater ambientation
π: 0 β©: 0
zakafreakarama [2008-04-16 05:49:11 +0000 UTC]
Actually Castorocauda is not considered a true mammal by most scientists, since the docodonta have no modern relatives, and their ear bones differ from those of true mammals. Does it mean Castorocauda is in fact a reptile? Interesting question!
π: 0 β©: 1
NTamura In reply to zakafreakarama [2008-04-17 05:54:15 +0000 UTC]
Yeah that's right, a mammaliaform, not quite a mammal (neither a therian, nor a monotreme) but not a reptile either. Generally speaking, Synapsids are not considered to be reptiles.
π: 0 β©: 1
TehFuzzyDuck In reply to NTamura [2008-05-03 17:41:43 +0000 UTC]
Very intriguing. Well done!
π: 0 β©: 0

























