HOME | DD

Published: 2009-07-20 16:48:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 4596; Favourites: 128; Downloads: 211
Redirect to original
Description
This is the first image I have taken since November, 2007, and, also probably the worst. But, it's good to be posting something new for the first time in over 1.5 years.First light for both the G-11 and my modified 40D.
I experienced all the woes, trials and tribulations on Saturday night, that comes with playing with new equipment for the first time. Levelling, balance, polar alignment, et. al., were a major pain in the you-know-what, but, towards the later part of the evening, things started to come good.
I only managed 1 hour and 40 minutes as the bottom of the frame started to sink below the trees (thank you, kappa-sigma stacking for removing the trees). I am not impressed with my framing; the constellation should have sat higher up in the composition, however, I did manage to capture M8 and M20, so, that was a bit of a bonus.
The skyglow gradient was pretty bad, but, IRIS handled it well, with some minor work having to be carried out in Photoshop.
Anyway, enough rambling. Full view for maximum pleasure.
Comments and critique, as always, are welcome.
This composite consists of one set of images; one set of 20 images taken at ISO-400.
Each individual image was a 300 second exposure.
IRIS was used to calibrate each image (dark subtraction [median combined master dark] and flat field division [median combined master flat {lights and darks}]), to register, align, stack, stretch and finally to remove skyglow and gradients.
Photoshop CS3 was used to adjust levels, curves, saturation, colour balance, local contrast, further gradient removal, frame and resize the final composite.
Target: The Constellation of Scorpius
Date: Saturday, July 18th, 2009
Time: First image: 11:33 PM
Time: Last image: 01:33 AM
Location: Mangrove Mountain, NSW, Australia
Camera: Canon EOS-40D (modified: Baader UV/IR filter)
Lens: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM (stopped down to f/5.6)
Focal length: 24mm
Mount: Losmandy G-11 (Gemini)
Guiding: Meade DSI-C through Orion ED80
Exposure: 20 x 300 seconds (1 hour 40 minutes) @ ISO-400 (RAW)
Software: IRIS: Calibration, registration, stacking, stretching, gradient removal; Adobe Photoshop CS3: post-processing and framing
Related content
Comments: 60
StarCreator200 [2010-01-16 02:02:53 +0000 UTC]
What a magnificent sight it would be if we could see the Milky Way in all its glory instead of just the faint, fuzzy stripe we see from Earth.
Pictures like these show just how small our Solar System is when compared to the whole galaxy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Toop [2009-09-30 00:27:56 +0000 UTC]
Impressive to say the least. You have an incredible talent.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to Toop [2009-09-30 14:56:10 +0000 UTC]
Toop,
Thank you! I'm blushing.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hector42 [2009-08-04 19:21:31 +0000 UTC]
If I had to pick the worst of your images, it would take a looong time for me to think about. They are all absolutely stunning. What you do in terms of astrophotography is what I can only dream about ^^ .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to Hector42 [2009-09-30 14:55:54 +0000 UTC]
Mate,
Thanks for the very kind words.
I know I still have a very, very long way to go. My goal is to be the best DSLR astrophotographer. It just needs a lot of patience and time.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hector42 In reply to octane2 [2009-11-21 01:39:55 +0000 UTC]
Hehehe, since you are trying to become the best dslr astrophotographer, we have to fight to the death now, because I also got a dslr lately and I think I'm doing a pretty good job with it already. You've got a competitor now !
Though I won't take many shots without filter. The big emission nebulae are first on my list and there is a lot to do.
Cheers, mate! Astrophotography rules! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
octane2 In reply to JAHarrell [2009-09-30 14:52:19 +0000 UTC]
JAHarrell,
Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed the image.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
manic-cure [2009-07-22 14:34:02 +0000 UTC]
I don't know how you do it. I wouldn't be able to accomplish a beautiful photo like yours. Great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to manic-cure [2009-09-30 14:51:58 +0000 UTC]
manic-cure,
I reckon, if you gave it a go, you'd be able to get results. Widefield astrophotography is a lot more forgiving than narrowfield/long focal length photography where so many other factors come into play.
Thanks for the very kind words. I'm most appreciative.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JonathonDobbs [2009-07-22 05:50:25 +0000 UTC]
Stunning, as always. Don't be so hard on yourself. What you call your "worst" humbles me greatly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to JonathonDobbs [2009-09-30 14:51:10 +0000 UTC]
Faded-Myth,
Thanks, mate.
I just felt that it wasn't up to my normal standards. Adding much more exposure equates to smoother final images.
I'll just have to re-do it next season.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
octane2 In reply to juhitsome [2009-09-30 14:50:34 +0000 UTC]
juhitsome,
Glad you enjoyed the image.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rubyan [2009-07-21 16:07:05 +0000 UTC]
It is very good to see new astrophotography of yours, I hope others are on their way. And thank you for great explanation of the image which is very informative.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to rubyan [2009-09-30 14:50:18 +0000 UTC]
rubyan,
Thank you, I'm glad you liked it.
There are plenty more on the way.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
octane2 In reply to curtition [2009-09-30 14:50:01 +0000 UTC]
Manuel,
Thanks, mate.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
curtition In reply to octane2 [2009-09-30 21:23:46 +0000 UTC]
Who's manuel??
LOL
It's ok, manuel and miguel all sound the same for someone named Humayun!
Hug
M
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to curtition [2009-12-28 01:53:16 +0000 UTC]
Miguel,
lol, sorry for that. How embarrassing!
Hey, you spelt my name correctly.
I promise not to do that again!
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to CapnDeek373 [2009-09-30 14:49:51 +0000 UTC]
CapnSkusting,
Great to be back.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anodesu [2009-07-20 23:58:44 +0000 UTC]
I always get a kick of how much is actually out there, especially when you take a shot of a constellation. You only think of the constellation for the particular stars that shape it, but when you look at something like this, it makes you feel very small, and I like that
I missed these pieces. *faves*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to Anodesu [2009-09-30 13:26:09 +0000 UTC]
Sedona,
Thank you for the comment.
I understand exactly what you mean. Another favourite is the Southern Cross. I look at it every night. It just looks like 5 stars. Then, take a look at the second image in my Astrophotography gallery, and you'll see that there are squillions of background stars. Stars that are so distant, or so faint, that the light source cannot be imaged, just their glow.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anodesu In reply to octane2 [2009-10-01 11:44:20 +0000 UTC]
and the crazy thing is that some of those aren't even stars, they're galaxies. I look at pictures like that and all i can think is that while we're lucky to exist in such a marvelous universe, there's no possible way that there isn't someone out there that is just as lucky as us. That kid i got into an argument with over it doesn't like me too much now.
On another topic, I just saw a thing on the 'Very Large Telescope' in South America. It looks really impressive... i wish i could see it someday. To be able to view the stars so clearly would be amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lupus-deus-est [2009-07-20 23:53:15 +0000 UTC]
Well I love it!
And do you know a way two penniless bikeless carless students can get from Coonabarabran to Siding Springs?
And do you know (out of curiosity) a Michael Drinkwater, a Kevin Pimblett, or a Brad Carter?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to Lupus-deus-est [2009-09-30 13:24:40 +0000 UTC]
Lupus-deus-est,
Thanks, glad you like it.
I don't think Coonabarabran is all that far from Siding Springs Observatory. You may even be able to ride a push-bike up there. Although, from memory, it does become a fairly steady climb up, even in the car. I look forward to going back to the Warrumbungles in the next couple of months to do some imaging.
And, my apologies, I don't know the names you've mentioned. Unless the first is a professor, then, in that case, I've heard his name.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lupus-deus-est In reply to octane2 [2009-10-02 03:24:32 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
I didn't get my submission in for summer scholarship there in time oh well! Oh, and Prof Michael Drinkwater is part of the Wigglez team
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to Lupus-deus-est [2009-10-30 11:21:39 +0000 UTC]
Lupus-deus-est,
The Wiggles, as in, the kids entertainers?
Wow.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lupus-deus-est In reply to octane2 [2009-10-31 13:01:42 +0000 UTC]
No no! The Wigglez with a z! [link] (As it turns out, both Pimbblet and Drinkwater are on the team...)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
octane2 In reply to oriontrail [2009-09-30 13:23:20 +0000 UTC]
oriontrail,
It is a beautiful part of the sky, for sure.
And, yes, astrophotography rules. But, it can also be very frustrating when equipment doesn't work or the weather conspires against you.
Still, every man must suffer for his art.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oriontrail In reply to octane2 [2009-09-30 13:55:33 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I know that
But at the end, when you get satisfying photo, you'll happy. Even just watching the sky at night, watching the light that stars have emitted few (hundred) years ago gathering in your eye...amazing
Astrophotography is for me the greatest part of photography. First photos I ever made were astrophotos...I become 'hotographer of things and nature' few months after I become in astrophotography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to oriontrail [2009-12-28 01:52:04 +0000 UTC]
oriontrail,
I think that's the same for most people who get involved with astrophotography; astrophotography really hones and sharpens post-processing skills (Photoshop). I've been using Photoshop since version 4 back in 1996/1997. I've become quite adept with it over the years, and, it helps me immensely with my wedding photography, as well as landscapes.
Cheers.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
octane2 In reply to EagleEye666666 [2009-09-30 13:22:14 +0000 UTC]
EagleEye666666,
I'm glad you like the image.
Thanks.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
quicksimon [2009-07-20 18:55:41 +0000 UTC]
H,
Good to see your astro work here again, and what a great image for the second coming! I have your 06 verson of this, (well, the Antares picture) on my bedroom wall. I'd be very lucky to capture this area of our galaxy this far north. It would take a very clear and dark night to see it at say 20 degrees above the horizon...
Regards
Simon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
octane2 In reply to quicksimon [2009-09-30 13:20:54 +0000 UTC]
Simon,
Thanks for the very kind words, mate.
Next year, I will gather more data. Perhaps I can combine it with the old data. Will see how we go.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
octane2 In reply to Lotay [2009-09-30 13:19:38 +0000 UTC]
Lotay,
Thanks. Glad you like it.
Regards,
H
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
House-of-Kadamon [2009-07-20 17:22:47 +0000 UTC]
I look at this image and think to myself..."I want to go home."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>