HOME | DD
onyxcarmine β Say it's a sequel
Published: 2015-05-25 23:18:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 3971; Favourites: 186; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description
Edit: Guys, there's no need to debate over this.ΒRelated content
Comments: 121
Old comment is old, i dont wanna have anything to do with this or FNAF ever again
π: 0 β©: 1
Personal onion tho. 
π: 0 β©: 1
I kind of bet it does, given how your opinion differs from the crowd
π: 0 β©: 0
I have a personal onion too. Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay, but there are numerous hints that the game is a prequel, the biggest one being that they talk about the bite of 87 in FNAF 1 and FNAF 2 takes place in 1987
π: 0 β©: 1
Its FNaF 101 and basic logic and STILL some retards say that.
π: 0 β©: 0
It's actually a sequel-prequel.Β
Sequel: Title
Prequel: Lore-wise
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe it's actually "prequel-sequel" not "sequel-prequel." I could very well be wrong, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
GRAMMER NAZI ALERTΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
Uhhhhh.........who cares? XD If you're not a FNAF fan, you automatically assume the second one IS a sequel......
π: 0 β©: 0
But that would ruined the fun
π: 0 β©: 0
Especially if you wonder why the animatronics are fixed in FNAF1, but not in FNAF2. Obviously broken.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm going to say this ain't nobody got time for your theories and debates
π: 0 β©: 0
git gud guy who said that fnaf2 is a sequel
π: 0 β©: 0
I didn't need game theory. I know it's a prequel because I can read a freaking paycheck..
π: 0 β©: 0
What if there are two timelines like in zelda, one where fnaf 2 is a prequel, and one where fnaf 2 is a sequel!
π: 0 β©: 0
I love how everyone is so defensive of their theories, and use Gametheory to back it up.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't care really either
I didn't expect people to get so defensive though
π: 0 β©: 1
Plus, Game Theory is kinda... Cringey.
I know the jokes are purposely bad, but it hurts. It really does.
Plus, it's a game where you open and close doors, and can SEE the jumpscare coming.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thankfully I have never watched game theory. Also I agree with you. I only made this for fun. Didn't expect people to start a debate over it
π: 0 β©: 1
DON'T, he is very cringey.
And debates start when FNAF theories are even mentioned. Here's MY theory; The restaurant is actually in space orbiting Mars (that's why there are stars outside), the animatronics are actually Hulk Hogan, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shaq,Β Gary Busey, and Dwayne Johnson, and Purple Guy is a drug smuggler.
π: 0 β©: 1
Most legit one I've ever heard.
π: 0 β©: 1
IKR? Pizza restaurants are like that IRL.
π: 0 β©: 0
Can everyone stop telling me its a prequel. Its not going to change my mind unless you have evidence to back it up. Its just like saying foxy or mangle caused the bite of 87 because they have sharp teeth it could have been Freddy or one of the other toys. Have a look at a different angle and find evidence for your theory before posting stuff.
π: 0 β©: 5
If you look closely at Fritz and Jeremy's paycheck at the date... it will say the year takes place in 1987. The game is somehow like a prequel-sequel.Β
Still, the year in FNAF1 is still unknown. It's impossible to think the Toys(except Mangle) caused the bite since their mouth seemingly looks impossible. There are many theories Jeremy could have been the victim though.
But your opinion stays if you want to.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'll back it up then in fnaf 1 phone guy died at night 4 and in fnaf 2 he is still very much alive
The toy animatronics were scraped cuz possibly glitches so they fixed up the old one's and used them starting a more little restaurant
Think about it it makes sense right?
Plus then you have your payment
If you watch an episode on game theory you'll see that the payment points to a minimum wage
π: 0 β©: 1
That's because Scott voiced the phone guy and besides how the hell would the withered animatronics get in fnaf 2 if it was a prequel?
π: 0 β©: 1
Cuz there were animatronics before that which are shown in the death mini game's
π: 0 β©: 1
Hmm.... that wouldn't make sense though unless fnaf 4 comes out. This conversation shall be continued
π: 0 β©: 1
31.media.tumblr.com/59cb3a15d9β¦
Evidence to back it up.
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay thank you (but it still doesn't change my mind sorry)
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm not saying its not I'm just saying my opinion and showing evidence to why I think so
π: 0 β©: 0
Quite frankly I don't care. Only made this for fun
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't mind people theorizing that its a prequel. What really ticks me off is that they argue about it and take sides >< making matters worse. This is just my opinion I'm not saying its true but they're taking it as a fact and arguing otherwise.
π: 0 β©: 0
People still think this game is a sequel?
Huh...
π: 0 β©: 0
to those people who think its a sequel, I suggest watching GameTheory
π: 0 β©: 0
I thought it was a sequel too, but then I realized that it wasn't. X3
π: 0 β©: 0
Pretty much everyone a couple of days after the 2nd one came out.
I was one of those people who thought it was a sequel until I actually beat the game.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Interesting, not to many people fight for that reason any more. I'm a bit lost after Scott's images of FNAF 4. Β What are the facts that led you to thinking FNAF 2 is a sequel?Β
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>