HOME | DD
onyxcarmine β Say it's a sequel
Published: 2015-05-25 23:18:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 3971; Favourites: 186; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description
Edit: Guys, there's no need to debate over this.ΒRelated content
Comments: 121
If you actually have a look at the paycheck you can see it has no date on it. If you listen to the phone call in fnaf 2 you can hear him say 'they even let them walk around during the day' and if you listen to the call in fnaf 1 he says 'they used to let them walk around during the day'. My main evidence is the paycheck in fnaf 1 it has no date on it, I think that fnaf 1 is a prequel and sequel making fnaf 2 a sequel
π: 0 β©: 2
How would it not having a date on it prove it's a sequel? It could be either that way. My evidence showing FNAF 2 as a prequel is that for one, the paycheck of FNAF 2 says 1987 obviously, and then in FNAF 1 they already had the bite of 1987, saying it previously happened. You'll even find traces of it's story on the walls in one area of FNAF 1. However, in FNAF 2 they didn't mention it in the least. But that's a bit fishy. Like you said, the animatronics also use to walk around in the day. Fnaf 2 is when they were aloud to walk around. Not to mention how the "original" animatronics of the Fazbear gang look completely different, as seen here adolfwolfed4life.deviantart.co⦠from the ones seen in FNAF 1. Some examples are that the 3rd gen Freddy from FNAF 1 has freckles, while the first doesn't have this common trait of the other Freddies, Bonnie's original has bigger teeth, Chica over all looks entirely different, and over all the original Fazbear gang has more then one set of teeth.
Β Β And at the end of FNAF 2, they said the day shift opened up the next day for you to take. This is most likely because as seen in FNAF 3, Purple Guy would like to take the night shift to destroy the toy animatronics after you've done your day shift. After killing the kids throughout FNAF 2, he then did so. Since in day light the old animatronics don't attack, he was able to use the golden Freddy suit to kill the children. However, at the night shift, it Golden Freddy was then like the other animatronics, leaving him only the choice of the spring trap suit. Mangle however earlier did not get scrapped, as her phantom image appears in FNAF 3 and it's likely she did the biting and then was moved away to be worked on or destroyed so she would not be able to be destroyed by Purple guy. It's most likely the "original" fazbear gang was re-made into the FNAF 1 fazbear gang, but they eventually thought after the bite of 1987 that Foxy's suit wasn't safe enough, making his area un-used.
Β That's acutally an interesting piece of evidence you pulled up that is something I often forget, however those two pieces of evidence don't show enough to prove it as a sequel. As I said, it could be true that it is that way as I'm a bit confused about FNAF 4's placing, but I'd like more evidence to show it.
π: 0 β©: 1
If fnaf 2 pizzeria came first then how did bonnie, Chica and foxy get into the parts and service room? Like I said fnaf 1 would have to be a sequel and prequel to make sense.
π: 0 β©: 0
that shit made no since.
think bout it.
fnaf2 they still walk around
fnaf1 they used to. used is a past tense word.
also its not even legal for them to be having a 120$ salery today but in the 90's it is minimum wage. and look at these restaurants. they are styled as if they were built decorated in the 80's or 90's.
no offense.
π: 0 β©: 1
I see what you mean though. But I don't think Scott wants to make the exact same game because it would be boring that's most likely why he put no date on the paycheck in fnaf its a prequel and sequel. Making fnaf 2 a sequel.
π: 0 β©: 1
Your evidence confuses me. But then again maybe I'm to stupid to understand
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe. But I'm not saying its correct, I'm saying its possible
π: 0 β©: 1
No it's not.... it's a prequel
π: 0 β©: 1
Fnaf 1 Is a prequel and sequel take a closer look at the paycheck in fnaf 1 it has no date and the newspaper in fnaf 2 says 'the toy animatronics will be scrapped due to possible malfunctions but the old ones will be kept in hopes in reopening' maybe you should have a look at a different angle before considering (I'm not being mean BTW)
π: 0 β©: 1
Exactly,the OLD ones are the witehred ones :3 they are the ones in fnaf1
π: 0 β©: 1
SAY IT'S A SEQUEL
I DARE YOU
I DOUBLE DARE YOU
π: 0 β©: 1
It's a sequel.. Isn't it?Β
π: 0 β©: 2
*EXTREME NASAL INHALING & Β EXHALING*
NO
NO
NO
π: 0 β©: 0
It's a prequel.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well it WAS made after the first game, so that made it a sequal, but it takes place BEFORE th bite of 87, mentioned in the first game. We know this because on your check at the end of the week, it says it's the year 1987. That and a lot of things in the third game point to the same conclusion. But I know what you're probably thinking. The "older" animatronics are all broken and busted up in the second game. How could they be older if they were just fine in the first game, which is the future? Well there was another location prior to the one from the second game. Effectivly the FIRST one, though it started at Fred bear's diner. The first Freddy fazbear's pizza is where Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy first came into play, but time wore them down, but after the events of FNAF 2, they were fixed up and put to work in the place from FNAF 1.
You should check out a show on youtube called Game theory, the guy has theorys on all three games to gather as much story as possible. And while there are some holes in the logic, for the most part they're pretty solid.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev |