HOME | DD

Published: 2008-07-11 20:00:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 29656; Favourites: 1298; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
scanners suck lolhaha wow!
the reason "scanners suck" by the way is beacuse when i tried to scan this on to my computer ( me being not so good with technology) kept doing it wrong the first time i tried to scan it i had the print the wrong way round
Also if you look closely there is a faint blue line across the picture from teh scanner! hmmmm
.....as i did explain to a few people before i got the DD that it was a compleate accident that the shot is how it is... again as im a total idiot exposed the wrong side of the paper and then turned it over and did it again ... and i have been told that i should own up to it being a mistake but ohh well
Related content
Comments: 440
BeautifulJune10 [2012-04-13 16:07:08 +0000 UTC]
This is fantastic! I found this via a google search for darkroom. I at first thought it was a double exposure..
But you said you exposed the wrong side of the paper? Do you mean the non-reactive side? And what gave you the effect of having the double image on top? The error in the darkroom, or with the scanner?
I am currently working with film, and I am trying to figure out new, different ways of using enlarger and such... let me know anything else, if you are willing to share... this is just an amazing image... I stared at it for a long time!
Thank you, and nice work! Even if it was a mistake
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
orjatar-321 In reply to BeautifulJune10 [2012-04-30 15:13:07 +0000 UTC]
Thankyou , it was an error in the darkroom, I exposed the backside of the back paper (non reactive side) and then when i realized my error i just flipped it over and exposed the right side not really thinking that the 1st exposure would have had an effect, this was one of the 1st times I ever used the darkroom.
What kinds of things do you want to know, I'm not a pro but i have a fair bit of experience in the darkroom b+w and colour xx
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Virg-inwater [2011-09-22 15:02:52 +0000 UTC]
yum. such a quiet looking pic, just kinda pulls you in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JackyRamone [2011-08-23 19:08:57 +0000 UTC]
beauty, if there is such a thing, comes always unexpectedly this is a deeply interesting image; you've inspired me to try this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JGDA9RS [2010-12-28 09:38:21 +0000 UTC]
screw them. mistake or not, this is just gorgeous. what camera did you take it with?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
orjatar-321 In reply to JGDA9RS [2010-12-28 13:43:47 +0000 UTC]
To be honest it was a long time ago I've forgotten but I think it was the olympus OM20
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
retroboy78 [2010-05-25 22:57:52 +0000 UTC]
It looks almost industrial. I love the old fashioned look.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
photonerd16 [2010-03-02 17:54:10 +0000 UTC]
I really love this, it reminds me of Alfred Stieglitz work or perhaps Lewis Hine.
Any who lovely job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evil-e33 [2009-10-30 23:06:41 +0000 UTC]
I have featured this wonderful piece in my latest journal Featuring Film photography [link] If you wish for it to me removed please let me know and I'll remove it a.s.a.p.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evil-e33 In reply to orjatar-321 [2009-10-31 01:33:09 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure, you're welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stueytheround [2009-08-14 23:04:29 +0000 UTC]
Aha! Laira bridge. Who'd have thought it could become art?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
orjatar-321 In reply to stueytheround [2009-08-14 23:06:32 +0000 UTC]
hahah yes who'd have thought! lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>