HOME | DD

Published: 2011-06-29 07:17:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 2055; Favourites: 16; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
Pictured are (left to right/top to bottom): Lenina, Bernard, John, HelmholtzI guess it’s finally time to come clean. I liked the book “Brave New World.” However…not in the way you think. Yes, I thought it was a well told and inventive story, but I liked it because I could not stop laughing at all the characters’ UST. It’s really one of those books that BL fangirls would gobble up looking for gay subtext and whatnot. But I’m not here to talk about other people’s fascination with pairing together characters that are in no way romantically involved in cannon. I’m here to talk about MY fascination with pairing together characters that are in no way romantically involved in cannon.
Helmholtz was my favorite, hands down. He always came off as a closet gay, and I can’t remember if the book said he smokes, but imagine he makes his own cigarettes without soma (cigs in that world pro’ly have soma in them to make them feel better). Also, I think he would be one of the few people in the world who wore glasses. Reason? Due to the advanced genes and medicine, I doubt people would have bad eyesight; otherwise they couldn’t perform their job as well. Helmholtz’s eyesight, however, began to deteriorate because of his job as a writer, and he never took any soma or other medicine to help it. He probably thought it made him more human. I’ll talk about him more in other pictures.
John was just fun to draw, I imagined him with scraggy, fluffy, long-ish hair—living at a savage reservation and all. The two pictures of him at the bottom I doodled as our class was reading the chapters in which his mother died, and he goes on a rampage and starts a riot.
Bernard was an interesting character at first, but then he became a douche. I drew him not too attractive, but good enough; what with his background.
Lenina. Meh. She was a whore. What else is there?
Disclaimer: I am well aware that this book was written in 1931 and all my thoughts are warped perversions of the author’s intentions.
Brave New World and characters (c) Aldous Huxley
Related content
Comments: 10
Raxel1447 [2012-04-17 01:05:37 +0000 UTC]
I love this and agree about Helmholtz. I'm reading the book right now for class, and, (I'm already a yaoi fangirl, so finding pairings for this book was a MUST) I immediately thought Helmholtz as gay. He;s my favorite character, and that only one I can stand besides John. I hate the book, but I don't mind reading it for the subtext.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
InfinitudeSovereign [2011-09-22 05:13:39 +0000 UTC]
I just wanted to say, I really love this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Revolution-Nein [2011-09-03 21:30:47 +0000 UTC]
I actually like that theory that cigarettes in that world are made with soma. I never actually thought about it, but it makes perfect sense. (As well as the idea that Helmholtz would try to make his own without soma.) And the idea that Helmholtz would be the only one who needs glasses because of his job as a writer. I can see you're the kind of person who thinks about things a lot. That's a good trait to have.
Also, my imagining of John is actually pretty similar to yours. And I love your drawing of John's angry rampage face. (Now I need to do a drawing of that as my class reads it...I'm currently reading it in school but I read it once before. It's one of my favorite books.)
And I didn't see any UST between the male characters in it whatsoever, which is really weird for me, because I always see that stuff (especially where it's totally unwarranted). However, as I re-read it, I'll have to look for it. And you may be pleased to know that, in my class, we've all decided (teacher included) that, since sex in Brave New World has nothing to do with reproduction and everyone is free to do what they want with who they want, there's no philosophical reason to believe that they oppose homosexuality.
And I noticed that Helmholtz has a plus sign on his tie because he's an Alpha Double-Plus. I like that detail!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
osakakitty In reply to Revolution-Nein [2011-09-04 00:21:27 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your comment! I really did think about this book so much during my senior year of high school...
I also thought that perhaps homosexuality wouldn't be considered taboo in this world for that same reason. That and being prudish about gayness would get in the way of the massive orgies.
Glad you noticed the plus sign! No one else seemed to get it. I also imagine some ties to be blank or have minuses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Revolution-Nein In reply to osakakitty [2011-09-04 02:00:30 +0000 UTC]
Wow, that's interesting, because I am in my senior year of high school and have been thinking a lot about it, too.
Yeah, your logic makes sense. I was recently reading the first orgy scene and thinking along those lines.
Oh, really? That's odd. But then again, I have a habit of noticing details like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StoryWeaverKirea [2011-06-30 01:56:21 +0000 UTC]
I read this book in grade 11. I remember it well. And yeah, I see the homoereotic subtext, its definitely there. I noticed that men tended to write women as plain and useless and just there for romance back in the day so yeah she does come off as a whore. And Bernard did lose his "good qualities" later on, he wasn't much of a protangonist. John was a better character hands down.
I liked the way you draw them, it fits with their personalities.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
osakakitty In reply to StoryWeaverKirea [2011-06-30 06:48:01 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much.
I read it last year - grade 12, and fell in love with Helmholtz's character. He should get his own spin-off story.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StoryWeaverKirea In reply to osakakitty [2011-06-30 19:21:51 +0000 UTC]
You're quite welcome!
Isn't the author of the story dead?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
osakakitty In reply to StoryWeaverKirea [2011-06-30 22:00:56 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, he's been dead for while. He did a lot of drugs.
Remember, crack is wack.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1