HOME | DD

Published: 2009-01-09 03:08:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 916; Favourites: 43; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description
Seriously. This actually does apply to so many, it's not even funny anymore.Don't like or disagree? Maybe you have that same problem.
EDIT: I'm getting mixed reviews here. It's more for the lulz than anything, I guess. I even think I made some mistakes on it. That's not good, now is it? No.
EDIT 2: has writtten this nice, lovely rant about what I'm trying to say here. All about why grammar is important. Read it!: NOW!! [link]
Please
Related content
Comments: 116
paintedbluerose In reply to ??? [2009-01-09 13:24:45 +0000 UTC]
Exactly! Maybe that's why Azula went insane at the end. She couldn't laugh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkBladeZZ In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-09 18:21:22 +0000 UTC]
That is an astounding hypothesis. I never would have thought of that. And it's so intriguing, too.
Would someone go insane if they lacked the ability to laugh?
Hmmmmmmmmmm.
The conspiracy theories just keep piling up - I love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to DarkBladeZZ [2009-01-12 01:26:53 +0000 UTC]
It would be interesting. And I think it's the truth for her. she didn't really laugh, she didn't really have fun like everyone else. She might have crackled, but not really laughed. Not enjoyed herself and had honest fun. the lack of it causes the person to go insane slowly. They long for happiness but have no idea how to do so. It's interesting and something brain-ish that takes too much to explain.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkBladeZZ In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-12 02:45:07 +0000 UTC]
Interesting indeed. Makes you wonder what she would have been like, and ultimately, how she would have ended up, if she had learned to be honestly happy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to DarkBladeZZ [2009-01-12 02:51:00 +0000 UTC]
She'd be different. It's like that Joker/Batman thing. Joker has no reason to be evil like everyone else does. There is no valid excuse for the way he is. He just is that way. But that's what makes him such a great villan. If he were different, it'll be different.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkBladeZZ In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-12 02:55:20 +0000 UTC]
I can agree with that.
Now, just for kicks, answer me this: which Joker do you like better - the original or the new one?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to DarkBladeZZ [2009-01-12 03:00:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I don't know. I think I like the new one-he definatly got his role down great. But the original was great too. I'm thinking more new-well, depends.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkBladeZZ In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-12 03:02:59 +0000 UTC]
I was just curious.
I personally enjoy the older versions of the Joker better; amusing villainy is more interesting to me than terror villainy.
Besides, any villain who can rob a bank and make you laugh while he's at it is a good one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to DarkBladeZZ [2009-01-12 15:45:38 +0000 UTC]
That's true. Any good villain is good, no matter what.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarkBladeZZ In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-12 18:02:57 +0000 UTC]
Which is kind of funny as villains are supposed to be "bad."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to DarkBladeZZ [2009-01-12 19:09:27 +0000 UTC]
True. But they good at being bad, so it's all good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shinigami-no-negai [2009-01-09 03:38:43 +0000 UTC]
Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to shinigami-no-negai [2009-01-09 04:26:41 +0000 UTC]
No prob! Someone needs to, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Firithnovwen In reply to ??? [2009-01-09 03:31:49 +0000 UTC]
I live and die by my beta reader, poor thing over worked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to Firithnovwen [2009-01-09 04:26:27 +0000 UTC]
I think we all do. Thank goodness for them!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Firithnovwen In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-09 18:43:51 +0000 UTC]
Yeah because my grammar is horrible, I proof read as much as I can but I'm hopeless when it comes to grammar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DragonWarrior24 In reply to ??? [2009-01-09 03:24:05 +0000 UTC]
I try hard to check my grammar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to DragonWarrior24 [2009-01-09 03:25:42 +0000 UTC]
It's bound to happen to miss a few. The point is, those who think it's not important just need to stop while they are behind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 03:25:56 +0000 UTC]
I knew you would. I wonder what he'll say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
foreverrussia1 In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-09 12:29:41 +0000 UTC]
She assumes correctly. BAH!!! I knew she had something to do with this.
You could have an opinion, you could dislike me but I ask that you do not discriminate me in front of all your watchers!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 13:23:41 +0000 UTC]
Um... actually, no. This is all me. Came up with it yest at work.
I did NOT say it was about you or for you. If you read the AC, it says I have seen SEVERAL people like that. As in, more than one. It's your own viewpoint if you think it's about you. Not me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-09 20:24:16 +0000 UTC]
Really...?
I'm not stupid, I read Avatargirl's comment!! She clearly tatled on me to you so you would make this!
Yesterday me and her were having a bit of a discussion about and the next day you make this. What a coincidence.... and then she leaves a comment like that... yo u post a relpy like that.
"What do you think he will say?"
"Probably something grammatically incorrect"
I think the he was representing me, am I correct?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
paintedbluerose In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-12 01:24:24 +0000 UTC]
No. No one tattled to me. NO one asked or said I should make this. This was of my OWN doing.
I can't help what you were having a conversation with or who it was it. The truth is, I'm on several sites, as is she. I talk to her about different things-including grammar since we both are particular about it. I do what I want when I want. I'm a very blunt person. I'm also very passionate. I can't help if something offends you without my knowledge. I did that with my Kataang, Maiko and Twilight stamps. It's about time for a grammar one. Been meaning to for a while now actually.
When I talk about someone, I don't always use who or what they are. I may say he when I mean she. Or vise versa. Or I may use a code name with someone, as I've done in the past. But no, you aren't the one I'm refering to. However, accusing me and making a scene like you are, it makes people wonder, don't you think?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-12 01:47:00 +0000 UTC]
I see what you mean. There's no way to solve this and no particular to do it. So lets just leave it at that. I'm still suspicious because of your close friendship with avatargirl and the short conversation you 2 had. But there's no way of making you admit this.
This is one of those occasions where I don't really need to prove my suspicions. The things I just pointed out should be enough.
From my point of view I'm right and from yours you are. I have no full way of proving mu suspicions but I'm 95% sure that my accusations are true.
Lets just end this conversation before anyone get's offended.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-12 02:36:41 +0000 UTC]
My close friendship and short conversation? You have no way of knowing just how much we communicate to each other. If it be just here or elsewhere-which by the way it is. Close friendship, it's easy for me to have one. I have them after talking to several different people. Have several people here online that are close friends of mine. Easy to do if you talk to them.
If you actually read the AC, you'll see I did this because I'm sick of seeing it everywhere that there are so many problems with grammar. Not just here. I've talked to avatargirl about SEVERAL different people. I've also talked to Myah5000 about some who don't think it's any use to us. This stamp was actually started a while ago when I read this Kataang story. It was really bad and I tried helping her, but she didn't think it was of any importance. I told her she needed to fix a few things and I could help her out, if needed. She didn't want to. I wanted a stamp then, but never made it. At work the other day, this idea of the exact words came to me. I wrote it two days before I posted it. I have several stamps saved in my computer right now ready to go, but I wait to pace them out.
Look, I'm not offended at all. I just think it's rude of you to comment and accuse me of something you have no idea what it's about. I've had that happen before in other devations with friends that I have PERSONAL conversations that we get. It's not right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-12 02:50:30 +0000 UTC]
CASE CLOSED!!
I told you to early, at this stage it's impossible to find out the entire truth, let alone have effective facts to back it up.
I'm not accusing you of anything!
I know that, Avatargirl is connected to this based on her comment, I could possible (95%) connected to this and the grammar conversation me and you had is also connected to this.
Tell me, what would you think in my situation. Anyhow, like I said- in this stage it's impossible to prove anything so lets just end this. It's pointless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-12 03:03:08 +0000 UTC]
If it's closed, then why do you continue to bring it up?
Connected to it based on her comment? Look, I have no idea what you are trying to say or anything.
If it was me, I'd be curious. But it's not like someone forced another to post it or else. I do it on my own opinon and judgement. Nothing else. Feel free to feel the way you feel. If you really want to end it, then stop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 21:25:26 +0000 UTC]
Do you really think I would? My God, I'm not a third-grader. You're quite egocentric to assume it's all about you.
Then again, if your grammar is bad enough to assume you have a hate stamp, shouldn't that tell you something?
Who knows? I might be talking about my brother.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 21:28:33 +0000 UTC]
GAH!!!!
I don't see anyone besides you saying anything like that!!! It's pretty obvious it has something to do with me. I could see through the lies you call a coincidence!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 21:32:28 +0000 UTC]
But paintedbluerose and I could have been talking about someone you've never even seen before!
I also don't believe in coincidence, so there's no way I would call it that.
I can have other conversations that don't involve you, you know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 21:36:06 +0000 UTC]
I know. It just seams kind of strange that this came out the same day me and you had that conversation!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 21:47:13 +0000 UTC]
It does seem somewhat strange.
Did it come out the day you and I had that conversation? I wasn't really paying attention, because life doesn't revolve around you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 21:50:29 +0000 UTC]
Yes I would agree about that. I am absolutely sure this has some connection to you. I'll leave it at that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 22:17:11 +0000 UTC]
Of course it does. She knows how much I utterly despise severe grammatical errors.
Plus, I'm her friend. I always have something to do with it.
The question is if you have anything to do with that, and I'm quite sure she's already answered that for you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 22:29:05 +0000 UTC]
And naturally you know that because of the fact that I actually made this comment. I knew you would come back to me through this and say "HA!! You even admitted it yourself!" but I knew that from the start. I'm not stupid, or at least not normal.
You can utterly despise all you want, be her doing this for you isn't going to help you in your quest to 'humiliate' me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 22:31:03 +0000 UTC]
I'm not on a quest to humiliate you.
Can you stop being egocentric? Just for a few days?
(That was rhetorical and needs no answer.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 22:34:27 +0000 UTC]
What about your new deviation then? What about that? See you don't mention my name but everyone knows who it's dedicated to because they read the previous comments. It's only going to make them visit my site, get me more page views and regular views. And they will not see your so called 'Grammatical Errors' and it will just get me more viewers, friends, watchers and possibly fans.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 22:36:39 +0000 UTC]
Get it through your thick skull this is not about you, it's about writers today as a whole!
If you feel you fall under this category described in my editorial, stop whining and do something about it. If you don't think you do, then leave it alone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 22:40:34 +0000 UTC]
I don't feel that I fall under this category, I feel that you think I do because you disliked my comments! And you were trying to act smart by adding your grammar crap on my page and when I proved to you that it wasn't a mistake you got pissed and decided to do this!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avatargirl92 In reply to foreverrussia1 [2009-01-09 22:41:50 +0000 UTC]
This isn't my submission, you know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foreverrussia1 In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 22:43:23 +0000 UTC]
I'm talking about the other one, your latest submission.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
avatargirl92 In reply to paintedbluerose [2009-01-09 03:33:42 +0000 UTC]
Nothing grammatically correct, I assume.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paintedbluerose In reply to avatargirl92 [2009-01-09 04:29:52 +0000 UTC]
Pft, is anything he says?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
myah5000 In reply to ??? [2009-01-09 03:17:49 +0000 UTC]
I still can't believe some idiots think that. Language has RULES, people!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>