HOME | DD

PanzerschreckLeopard — KV-2

Published: 2008-11-12 10:46:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 1189; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description Just a quick photo manipulation. The KV-2 sure had a huge turret.
Related content
Comments: 30

Mhvost [2012-06-14 13:09:39 +0000 UTC]

No one ever imagined KV-2 as something other than mobile fort-buster. If you want to compare Sherman with soviet tanks, use IS-2, or, better T-34-85 ))

Sherman never existed during years of KV-2 production, so, if you want to compare heights, use 3+ meters high M3 Lee instead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Mhvost [2012-06-16 18:50:01 +0000 UTC]

I made this 4 years ago, ya' know XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mhvost In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2012-06-17 11:07:45 +0000 UTC]

C'mon, necroposting is a tolerable kink in modern society ~__^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Mhvost [2012-06-18 05:44:32 +0000 UTC]

Ohh -w-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DrakeRenar1 [2012-02-07 05:50:13 +0000 UTC]

Maybe but do know how much damage the gun that the KV-2 has does it is a lot of damage.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to DrakeRenar1 [2012-02-07 21:11:20 +0000 UTC]

Ja, it does

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Unknownmarksman115 [2011-06-21 20:03:10 +0000 UTC]

its funny that KVs are blockheads

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Unknownmarksman115 [2011-06-27 13:39:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Unknownmarksman115 In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2011-06-27 16:37:27 +0000 UTC]

m4 shermans were fatties and m3 grants/lees were ninjas

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Unknownmarksman115 [2011-06-27 17:04:35 +0000 UTC]

Hmm?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tomcio199214 [2011-06-15 09:45:47 +0000 UTC]

and little problem to turn it on the hills when he moved up or down of it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to tomcio199214 [2011-06-15 13:15:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tomcio199214 In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2011-06-15 13:53:37 +0000 UTC]

what? I like the KV tank and your draw is cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to tomcio199214 [2011-06-15 14:20:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tomcio199214 In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2011-06-15 17:09:09 +0000 UTC]

I won't comment that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to tomcio199214 [2011-06-15 18:14:06 +0000 UTC]

I forgot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Theropia [2011-05-26 20:04:09 +0000 UTC]

The massive turret was to make space for the 152mm gun and its shells. I'm guessing they even have a rammer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Theropia [2011-05-27 00:08:17 +0000 UTC]

I think there were 2 loaders.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Theropia In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2011-07-13 23:13:03 +0000 UTC]

Most likely yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

p3rsh1ng [2009-01-12 18:08:50 +0000 UTC]

O_O a bit bulky tank o_O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to p3rsh1ng [2009-01-12 18:31:55 +0000 UTC]

Clearly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eisenmann87 [2009-01-10 10:11:04 +0000 UTC]

Wow. They've should have added a target on the turret with the lettering: "Please shoot us"....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Eisenmann87 [2009-01-10 17:36:03 +0000 UTC]

XD Still...

During the morning, the II.Abteilung/Panzer-Regiment 11 together with Kampfgruppe von Seckendorff advanced along the right-hand march route. Throughout the day both units fought off repeated attacks from the Russian 2nd Armored Division. Unfortunately, the Russian 52 ton heavy tanks showed that it was almost insensitive to hits from the 10.5-cm. Several hits from a 15-cm gun were ineffective and bounced off. However, continuous attacks by several Pz Kpfw lV managed to knock out a large number of tanks throughout the day, which allowed our own attack to again drive forward to about three kilometers west of Dubysa.

The bridgehead of Kampfgruppe Raus was held. During the afternoon, as a reserve, a reinforced company and the headquarters of Panzer-Abteilung 65 were pulled back along the left attack route to the crossroads northeast of Rossienie. In the meantime a Russian heavy tank had blocked the communications route to Kampfgruppe Raus, so that contact with Kampfgruppe Raus was broken for the entire afternoon and during the night. An 8.8-cm Flak battery was sent by the commander to fight this tank. It was just as unsuccessful as a 10.5-cm battery whose fire was directed by a forward observer. In addition, an attempt by a Pioneer assault troop using balled explosives failed. It was impossible to get close to the tank because of heavy machine gun fire.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

griffindragon In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2010-09-14 06:12:34 +0000 UTC]

that just shows how FUCKING AWESOME the KV series are. KV tanks are fortresses. KV series > Tiger series, in my opinion, in terms of reliability, and maintenence, not to mention armor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to griffindragon [2010-09-14 19:52:42 +0000 UTC]

Compared to TIGER, no.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eisenmann87 In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2009-01-10 17:38:54 +0000 UTC]

Uh... Okay?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PanzerschreckLeopard In reply to Eisenmann87 [2009-01-10 18:53:00 +0000 UTC]

What?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Eisenmann87 In reply to PanzerschreckLeopard [2009-01-10 19:22:01 +0000 UTC]

?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dguilfoyle [2008-11-12 13:26:58 +0000 UTC]

I've seen that tank before.
When I saw it, I said "SHIIIIET, that ain't real" and exited the website -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

legolegs In reply to Dguilfoyle [2011-10-25 13:06:07 +0000 UTC]

I am sure when the Finnish army met KV first time they said the same words. Unfortunately they weren't able to exit the site.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0