HOME | DD

Published: 2005-07-20 10:27:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 534; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 39
Redirect to original
Description
Taken on super macro mode, with a Canon Powershot Pro 1 Digital Camera. The light conditions were poor and it was raining at the time.Related content
Comments: 19
Solkku [2006-02-19 22:52:26 +0000 UTC]
That is really a nice shot. I like the composition and colours in this one. But (yes there's a but), I think you could have got a better result in choosing another angle (from one of the sides) to avoid the burnt out area on the mushroom hat. Also the image seems a bit grainy to my taste in a shot like this. What is that bright spot at the right side of the stem?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to Solkku [2006-02-19 23:09:16 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the comment . No, not too harsh....It was raining cats and dogs at the time - even though there was also sunshine-the spot you can see is a water drop on the lens-unavoidable. It was a mushroom that came up that morning and was only about 2cm high. The shot was taken using the super macro mode on the canon powershot pro1 which has a fixed 28-200mm lens.
Other angles werent possible as the area was full of brambles and I already had my butt sticking out into the road (the mushroom was literally on the verge of a very narrow lane) and the mushroom was right next to a n oak tree The graininess may be from the size of submission. The original is an 8m pixel shot on ASA100 equivalent, so not sure why its grainy- might be a lot of noise in the shot, as I have not done any processing at all to this - not even auto levels. It is exactly how it was seen by the camera. (Canon require this for their site)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Solkku In reply to parallel-pam [2006-02-20 02:06:39 +0000 UTC]
Well it is really good bearing in mind you haven't done any post processing to this. But I think you could have done this photo more justice to PP it before submitting it on dA. The grainyness/noisiness is always a factor that will cause people to think less of a photo, even though it is a good one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to Solkku [2006-02-20 07:56:01 +0000 UTC]
no probs on tje subject of post processing..i did add a watermark..thats not in the camera
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Solkku In reply to parallel-pam [2006-02-20 16:42:32 +0000 UTC]
Heh. Of course, didn't think of that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to photodom [2005-12-17 00:28:29 +0000 UTC]
thanks- its probably my most favourite macro shot - so glad you like it too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TabWmDavis [2005-12-02 17:10:29 +0000 UTC]
Nice macro shots, what do you use for your macro photography (lens, etc.)? Peace.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to TabWmDavis [2005-12-02 17:15:28 +0000 UTC]
Hi,
I have a canon powershot pro 1 digital camera with a built in 28-200 lens and a macro and super macro function on the camera. This shot was shot on supermacro witch allows a closeup distance of 3cm Thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MyLaundryStinks [2005-07-30 19:36:16 +0000 UTC]
Weather and lighting do not have to be perfect in order to get a good shot. Some of my best photos were taken on drab days.
This is flippin awesome. Methinks I'mma hafta watch you.
Cheers!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to MyLaundryStinks [2005-07-30 20:00:35 +0000 UTC]
oh thats fine- I like being watched (in this way of course Glad you like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hey-magpie [2005-07-21 12:58:33 +0000 UTC]
awh it's cute! ... That really is the only thing I can think of to say.
mushrooms rock.
...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wiccawitch [2005-07-20 17:21:59 +0000 UTC]
well done! first deviation!
it looks like an umbrella. and i have the compulsion to draw a fae underneath it...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to wiccawitch [2005-07-21 09:43:38 +0000 UTC]
thanks; why not draw a fae..that compulsion#s harmless so why not?- would make an interesting illustration..Still gettting used to this communication culture..cant find the emoticons..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
parallel-pam In reply to fulcanelli [2005-07-21 09:45:32 +0000 UTC]
thanks..no didnt, its probably either deadly or hallucinagenic...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fulcanelli In reply to parallel-pam [2005-07-21 12:37:54 +0000 UTC]
If it was both, it sure would be a nice way to go...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parallel-pam In reply to fulcanelli [2005-07-23 21:18:58 +0000 UTC]
Think I'll stick around for a bit (lol)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0