HOME | DD
peterku — Blaser
#fi #rifle #sci #sniper
Published: 2018-07-15 16:03:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 23149; Favourites: 575; Downloads: 367
Redirect to original
Description
Concept of sci fi sniper rifle for fictional scenario. It is supposed to use battery insted of standard bullets.I worked in 3ds max, used vray rendering engine and finished it in photoshop.
So what do you think. Do you like it or not? tnx for comments if any. bye.
Related content
Comments: 72
Hi mate. tnx you for critic. I will try to give reaction on those points:
in general. I never do model on 100 percent. To do some small part cost same time as to do big one. To save time for each element I do main feature and some details but never all of them. this helps me to save production time so I can move on another model. Most people dont notice it anyway. (probably up to 90 percent). Only skilled persons notice it but they are small minority. Same I am in topology of mesh.
In the past I also was focused to have clean model but now I do it quick in quality I am glad it doesnt fall apart. it also save me time.
-bipod. I saw similar principle on real one. but definitely it missing some small parts for adjusting.
-Scope - i didnt know that until know. tnx. I will check it on internet.
-yea you are right about that folding stock. Its meant to be just detachable but pulling out the pin. will have to make it collapsible by turningnext time.
- I used to make some displays on models but a lot of people point it out as unrealistic becouse it would make it visible from distance. therefore now I preffer to use some cable from body to scope but didnt use it on this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, the display issue only is an issue if it has backlighting. If it's like an "e-ink" type display like the Kindles or other reading tablets that do not actually light up, you'll see it fine but others at distance would not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
in reality could be. But when I do some display everyone points it out as flaw....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOL, point taken, that could be annoying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Quite a pleasing-looking gadget for "spreading the democracy".
Will work (if not talking about the actual type of releasing and shooting mechanism...), need no general improvements, has good design and practical composition, most likely, can be used as both long-range rifle and automatic mid- and close-range action.
Only two things to keep in mind (even though not critical in this case) are putting supports a li-i-ittle bit further for better comfort, due to quite tight positing of operator's hands - and a soft cork or cloth coating for sights lens on operator's end - in case of having one's eye too close to scope during recoil to avoid becoming a pirate (sharpshooters tend to forget that at times in the beginning of their career).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tnx you mate. I take those objections. lol that pirate thing.
yea, Composition should be good but just becouse I took proportion from real rifle - AWM rifle.
regards
PK
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well, about the pirate thing, most high-end long-range scopes have adjustments for eye-relief. And an actual sniper wouldn't make it so close that it would actually do that during operation...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And you did a great job, as you can see, he-he.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow, this is really, really good! I like the idea here, truly. This is some really good work. Not many people do this kinda stuff, so when there's some exceptional work like this, just... *brain explosions*
I only marked down vision due to lack of color. I understand it's a gun, and from the looks and 'sci-fi' tags, it's probably synthetic, but, some color would be nice here. Maybe some color for the safety, or the scope.
I mark down originality, and I admit, this is a wee bit unfair, but... it is heavily based on the Accuracy International AWSM Cold War Bolt Rifle (or the AWP from Counter-Strike). I like the modern/futuristic look, but when creating a gun, I feel one should be as original as possible. I'm not complaining, I swear. I just feel that if someone is to create a new weapon, it should have a new style or shape.
With that, I think is superb work. I like the chosen angels, the folding stock, barrel design... it's all wonderful! Bravo, and jolly good show. Please, keep on keeping on!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hi mate. tnx for positive comments.
Colour. time by time I do some colored models but personally black and white picture with few drops of some colour is my most favourite. But agreed that colour always brings more life on models.
AWM; You are right. I often use some real gun to get right proportion. to hit right proportion on model Is always dificult for me so Use this addition leg to get it.
regards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thiiiiiis looked like a rail gun. Or at least one if the sci-fi depictions of one. Still very badass though
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The square of the front meshes very nicely with the round of the back. Very cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tnx you. I tried to get something from simple cube.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
...love the look and design on this one too, but again don't care much for the idea of battery over bullets.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i used battery instead of ammo just to have more room for changes the designs
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
While some users may complain about originality, I love your work for how more realistically this would represent the direction of firearms. Their appearance wouldn't change much, just what we fire out of them, and honestly, once we get to this point we probably wouldn't advance any further because there'd be no need.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tnx. I think same mate. how to hold it wont change in the future I guess. but when I came out of real models then It saves my time becouse I hit right proportion in first time....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Awesome stuff. Love the "Nikon" scope, great attention to detail. Feels very real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
using the new shuttle plasma drive concept. "Lighting Magnetic" introduces a coaxial magnetic confinement fusion plasma rail gun... true it is only 5 shots per battery ,, but when each shot has the same effect as mobile artillery of old.. now the average soldier don't have to wait on artillery or air strike.!! an since this line of sight , the point defense system against "air to surface" missiles is usually not activated..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol mate. so mobile artillery into pocket?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ok.. yes i agree.. but back to original statement .. the military wants to do AWAY with conventional artillery .. because of cost an man power of "moving" the ammo.. in just Desert shield/storm (9months) it cost the military 5 billion ,, just to supply the 155mm ammo, from port to various units, in theater..
an just a side note... firing the rail gun at 160km it was +-3" (8cm) on target... an it's only in the air a minute...
the Exocet missiles normal range is 70km an takes bout 7 minutes to get there (with range boosters to make 160km takes bout 16 minutes..)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I checked some documents in the past describing cost of that gulf war and it was just incredible in what numbers/cost/prices your country's army operates in. There is no other nation which could operate on that scale. dont get me in wrong way. I dont claim your engineers will not be able to build it. It is very advance technology (big chalenge for engineers and material technology) but eventually they will do it. I just think that when they achieve the goal and get ready to produce those systems in factories like any other system then ground army find out it is just too expensive. They buy several pieces for testing and keep using normal artillery. But I am not expert. I can be wrong.
That accuracy in 160 km away in distance can be achieved only by controled fly. that means GPS and that is very expensive nowadays. acceleration at the start is much bigger then in ordinary artillery. To survive it is hard task for that device. as example look at this : www.popularmechanics.com/milit… . and it is still normal artillery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
just so you know "Blaser" is an actual firearm company...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
really? I choose name quite randomly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes really,, i have the R8 rifle in .308 an F3 shotgun in 12g..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You should work for Bungie. These should be in Destiny 2.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Keep your fingertips clear of that open rail, or you'll have a case of "Walther bite" that will affect your grandchildren.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the truly powerful ones now,, have to be fired in vacuum .. because all the side effects (speed, sound, plasma, an impact) cause so much secondary damage.. (( in one vid the shock wave almost killed the camera man , who was behind an off to an angle ..))
edit: plasma railgun.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
and so it is dangerous for everyone around...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh, man, that thing looks like a rail gun, with the muzzle located behind the external vertical rails. Very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>