HOME | DD
Pheagle-Adler β Phil 'Pheagle' Adler - Holstein Form: Model Sheet
#adler #bell #bovid #bovine #cattle #cow #cowbell #dairy #farmer #form #friesian #holstein #model #overalls #phil #red #redandwhite #reference #rippage #sheet #spotted #transformation #udder #ungulate #wfa #white #pheagle #hg3300 #artofwfa
Published: 2016-02-24 19:54:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 32977; Favourites: 198; Downloads: 157
Redirect to original
Description
A reference for my bovine form, Phil is a dairy farmer with a red-and-white Holstein cow form. Phil's spot pattern is open to interpretation as long as his facial pattern does not change. He is strictly a male cow, even though he has an udder, and his cowbell is often a catalyst for transformations.Drawn by who is an excellent choice for reference sheets!
Related content
Comments: 49
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
omfg I love this character also big oof at the comment below cause I can imagine what it said
lol you're allowed to have a male cow with an udder
π: 0 β©: 1
Don't care what you're saying, doesn't change this ref
π: 0 β©: 1
No, that's not criticism. You're just telling me I'm not allowed. And I'm telling you that you can't tell me no. My cow form is male and that's how it's going to stay.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
All I said was "Don't care what you're saying, doesn't change this ref" and you took it as an attack. Get over yourself.
π: 0 β©: 1
Do you get milked by a machine? or can you milk yourself? you are cute
π: 0 β©: 1
I have hooves, how would I milk myself lol
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
I have to say I like the face tf shot on the top right. You should make it an icon
π: 0 β©: 1
It is a good face
π: 0 β©: 0
*shrugs* Females are overrated
π: 0 β©: 0
"Male cow"... you mean bull? A bull with an udder? That's like a man with breasts.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nope, I mean a male cow. And that IS a valid use of the term 'cow'
I'll just reference 'Barnyard' and you can go from there. I'm not exactly taking a page out of their book, but it's a similar concept.
π: 0 β©: 1
That is not a valid use of the term, not when the gender is known. If you look here (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_at_β¦ ) you'll see that he would biologically be female. The only logical explanation is that Otis is a FTM.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dude, you might want to check Merriam Webster.
www.merriam-webster.com/dictioβ¦
It's the second f*cking definition.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm aware of the colloquialism; you misunderstand me.
Using "cow" to mean domestic bovines in the general sense is only correct when the gender is either female, mixed, or unknown (see definition 1.1 and examples in the Oxford: www.oxforddictionaries.com/def⦠). But fine, let's go with cow being the singular for cattle, and bull being phrased as "male cow".
In this case it is clearly not unknown (visible udder), yet contradictory.Β I'm not arguing semantics here, I'm saying bulls (male cattle) have penises and testicles, whereas cows (female cattle) have udders and vaginas. Therefore,Β a bull (or male cow as you put it) with an udder is simply impossible unless it is some sort of intersex or transgender individual. Either that or your farmer character changes biological gender when shapeshifting.
Do you understand where I'm coming from now?
π: 0 β©: 1
Sort of, but let's just convene for a second here. This is fantasy, not reality. My farmer character is a male cow with an udder. I know that's not typical in reality (there might be a few rare cases, idk) but I'm also not that into TG.
And as far as the human male is concerned, they have been known to lactate although also uncommon and in certain circumstances.
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay yeah fair enough it is fantasy... but even in fantasy you do have to have some degree of believability (or rather, "explainability"), otherwise you're straining your audience's suspension of disbelief. Male mammals with functional mammaries basically never occur, but let's go with that. So you're saying that it is still biologically a male (i.e. a bull), with male bits, and an udder in addition. That would be the bovine equivalent of a futanari, yes?
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't know what a futanari is...
But like I said, why can't male cows have udders? It's like giving a male kangaroo a pouch (the show Seinfeld claims that 'they have things to carry too..')Β
And what about seahorses?Β
I'd prefer to keep things simple in this case, but I'm not really interested in TG
π: 0 β©: 1
Male cows can't have udders and male kangaroos (and all other marsupials) can't have pouchesΒ for the same reason men can't have boobs:Β only females have those in reality. In seahorses however, it isΒ the male that carries the eggs in a pouch after the female has laid them. It's just the fascinating way nature works.
Sure, reality can be bent for the sake of fantasy, but then at least make it consistent. You can't say that a male with mammaries of an existing species is not a hermaphrodite of some kind (not necessarily TG though).
In manga and anime, a futanari is a hermaphrodite character that has both breasts and male genitals, colloquially known as a "dickgirl". That's pretty much exactly what you're describing, a male with mammary glands, just not in human form.
π: 0 β©: 1
Why can't I say that? It's fantasy. I think you're being a tad ridiculous with this.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, I'm a stickler for accuracy and consistency. Don't worry about it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well I've made it as consistent and accurate as possible while keeping it male and with an udder.
π: 0 β©: 1
Your character, your choices. I shouldn't be nitpicking over this when I've seen far weirder.
π: 0 β©: 1
Does he look like Bon Scott?
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>